感知价值和参与体验:社交媒体平台信息流广告的用户评估研究
Perceived Value and Engagement Experience: A User Assessment Study of Infomercials on Social Media Platforms
DOI: 10.12677/JC.2023.114121, PDF,   
作者: 蒲俣瑄:重庆师范大学新闻与传媒学院,重庆
关键词: 感知价值参与体验平台差异信息流广告 Perceived Value Engagement Experience Platform Differences Infomercials
摘要: 社交媒体信息流广告的研究具有极强的社会意义,但当前的研究主要集中于信息流广告的投放效果,对于用户的心理本位研究还未有足够的重视。对于从用户心理出发研究信息流广告,本研究在感知价值的基础上进一步引入了参与体验的概念,在当下热门的社交媒体平台中选择抖音和小红书平台做实证研究,进而探讨用户在社交媒体某一具体时刻的体验是否会影响其对广告的评估。研究发现,感知价值和参与体验是用户评价社交媒体信息流广告的影响因素之一,并且发现参与娱乐体验和识别体验越深的用户往往对于信息流广告评价越低,这告知了广告主和平台方应当更注重信息流广告的沉浸感和体验感,并且应注重负面情绪用户。
Abstract: The study of social media infomercials is of great social significance, but the current research mainly focuses on the effect of infomercial placement, and has not paid enough attention to the study of users’ psychological background. To study infomercials from the perspective of users’ psychology, this study further introduces the concept of participation experience on the basis of perceived value, selects TikTok and Xiaohongshu platforms among popular social media platforms to do empirical research, and then explores whether users’ experience at a specific moment in social media affects their evaluation of advertisements. The study finds that perceived value and engagement experience are one of the influencing factors on users’ evaluation of social media infomercials, and finds that the deeper the engagement entertainment experience and recognition experience, the lower the evaluation of infomercials, which informs advertisers and platforms that they should pay more attention to the sense of immersion and experience in infomercials, and focus on the users with negative emotions.
文章引用:蒲俣瑄. 感知价值和参与体验:社交媒体平台信息流广告的用户评估研究[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2023, 11(4): 810-818. https://doi.org/10.12677/JC.2023.114121

参考文献

[1] 喻国明. 镶嵌、创意、内容: 移动互联广告的三个关键词——以原生广告的操作路线为例[J]. 新闻与写作, 2014(3): 48-52.
[2] 鞠宏磊, 黄琦翔, 王宇婷. 大数据精准广告的产业重构效应研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2015, 22(8): 98-106.
[3] 李彪. 信息流广告: 发展缘起、基本模式及未来趋势[J]. 新闻与写作, 2019(10): 54-58.
[4] 杨萍, 王斌, 纪春礼, 等. 基于TPB修正模型的微信朋友圈广告接受意愿研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2016(21): 71-73.
[5] 刘洋. 微信信息流广告特性对用户广告态度的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 黑龙江: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017.
[6] 霍虹宏. 社交媒体信息流广告实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 东北财经大学, 2019.
[7] Zeithaml, V.A. (1988) Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Syn-thesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kotler, P. (1994) Reconceptualizing Marketing: An Interview with Philip Kotler. European Management Journal, 12, 353-361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C. and Gupta, S. (2007) Value-Based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43, 111-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Woodruff, R.B. (1997) Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 139-153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Groth, J. (1995) Important Factors in the Sale and Pricing of Services. Management Decision, 33, 29-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 胡允银. 知识产权密集型产品顾客感知价值驱动要素及影响因子剖析[J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28(8): 10-13, 25.
[13] Hollebeek, L. (2011) Exploring Customer Brand Engagement: Definition and Themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19, 555-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Voorveld, H.A.M., van Noort, G., Muntinga, D.G. and Bronner, F. (2018) Engagement with Social Media and Social Media Advertising: The Differentiating Role of Platform Type. Journal of Advertising, 47, 38-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Calder, B.J., Isaac, M.S. and Malthouse, E.C. (2016) How to Capture Consumer Experiences: A Context-Specific Approach to Measuring Engagement Predicting Consumer Be-havior across Qualitatively Different Experiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 56, 39-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Norris, C.E. and Colman, A.M. (1992) Context Effect on Recall and Recognition of Magazine Advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 21, 37-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Malthouse, E.C. and Schaedel, U. (2009) An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 321-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Pelletier, M.J., Krallmana, A.F.G., et al. (2020) One Size Doesn’t Fit All: A Uses and Gratifications Analysis of Social Media Platforms. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14, 269-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Alhabash, S. (2017) A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among College Students? Social Media + Society, 3, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Huang, S.L. and Chang, C.Y. (2020) Understanding How People Select Social Networking Services: Media Trait, Social Influences and Situational Factors. Information & Management, 57, Article ID: 103323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Wang, C. and Zheng, S.C. (2020) Complement or Substitute? Inves-tigating the Interdependence Effects among Mobile Social Apps. Information & Management, 59, Article ID: 103362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef