经济政策不确定性对中国碳市场波动影响研究——基于多因素GARCH-MIDAS模型
Research on the Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on China’s Carbon Market Volatility—Based on the Multi-Factor GARCH-MIDAS Model
摘要: 本研究考察了经济政策不确定性对中国碳市场波动的影响和预测能力,重点研究了交易活跃的湖北和广东碳市场。研究考虑了全球经济政策不确定性和中国经济政策不确定性两个宏观变量,探讨它们对碳市场价格波动的影响。首先,运用GARCH-MIDAS模型评估经济政策不确定性指数对碳市场波动的影响,为进一步研究奠定基础。随后,结合全球和中国经济政策不确定性指数,开发多因素GARCH-MIDAS模型和单因素GARCH-MIDAS模型来预测碳市场波动。结果表明,在样本外预测精度上,将经济政策不确定性纳入考虑的多因素GARCH-MIDAS模型要优于单因素GARCH-MIDAS模型。此外,中国经济政策的不确定性显著影响碳市场的波动。具体来说,中国经济政策不确定性指数的预测精度超过全球经济政策不确定性指数。逐步纳入全球和中国的经济政策不确定性指数后,碳市场尤其是广东碳市场价格的预测能力变得更加强大。综上所述,投资者可以利用GARCH-MIDAS模型加上经济政策不确定性指数的方法来预测波动性并构建投资组合以提高经济回报。本研究为碳市场投资者和政策制定者更好地理解经济政策不确定性对碳市场的影响提供了宝贵的见解,从而能够制定更有效的政策措施。
Abstract: This study explores the influence of economic policy uncertainty on economic development and its forecasting ability on carbon market volatility in China, focusing on carbon markets in Hubei and Guangdong, which are heavily traded. Two macro variables, global economic policy uncertainty and Chinese economic policy uncertainty, are considered to explore their effects on carbon market price volatility. First of all, GARCH-MIDAS model is used to evaluate the impact of economic policy uncertainty index on carbon market volatility, which lays a foundation for fur-ther research. Then, combined with global and Chinese economic policy uncertainty index, multi-factor GARCH-MIDAS model and single-factor GARCH-MIDAS model are developed to predict carbon market volatility. The results show that the multi-factor GARCH-MIDAS model which takes economic policy uncertainty into account is superior to the single-factor GARCH-MIDAS model in out-of-sample forecasting accuracy. In addition, uncertainty about China’s economic policies significantly affects the volatility of the carbon market. Specifically, the Chinese economic policy uncertainty index is more accurate than the global economic policy uncertainty index. With the gradual inclusion of global and Chinese economic policy uncertainty indices, the predictive power of the carbon market, especially the Guangdong carbon market price, has become stronger. In summary, investors can use the GARCH-MIDAS model plus the economic policy Uncertainty index to predict volatility and construct portfolios to improve economic returns. This study provides valuable insights for carbon market investors and policymakers to better understand the impact of economic policy uncertainty on carbon markets and thus be able to formulate more effective policy measures.
文章引用:郭若男, 凌美君. 经济政策不确定性对中国碳市场波动影响研究——基于多因素GARCH-MIDAS模型[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(6): 6661-6677. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.136658

参考文献

[1] Dong, K., Dong, X., Jiang, Q., et al. (2021) Valuing the Greenhouse Effect of Political Risks: The Global Case, Applied Economics, 53, 3604-3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Chen, X., Sun, X. and Wang, J. (2019) Dynamic Spillover Effect between Oil Prices and Economic Policy Uncertainty in BRIC Countries: A Wavelet-Based Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55, 2703-2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Gao, R., Zhao, Y. and Zhang, B. (2021) The Spillover Effects of Economic Policy Uncertainty on the Oil, Gold, and Stock Markets: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 2134-2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Lyu, Y., Tuo, S., Wei, Y., et al. (2021) Time-Varying Effects of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Shocks on Crude Oil Price Volatility: New Evidence. Resources Policy, 70, Article ID: 101943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Guo, P., Zhu, H. and You, W. (2018) Asymmetric Dependence between Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Returns in G7 and BRIC: A Quantile Regression Approach. Finance Research Letters, 25, 251-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Yu, J., Shi, X., Guo, D. and Yang, L. (2021) Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) and Firm Carbon Emissions: Evidence Using a China Provincial EPU Index. Energy Economics, 94, Article ID: 105071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 梁超, 魏宇, 马锋, 李霞飞. 我国黄金期货价格波动率预测研究: 来自模型缩减方法的新证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 30-41.
[8] 史惠婷, 柴建, 卢全莹, 汪寿阳. 北美天然气现货价格波动机制分析及波动率预测[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(12): 3366-3377.
[9] 吴鑫育, 刘天宇. 具有时变波动率持续性的已实现EGARCH模型及其实证研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(9): 2444-2459.
[10] Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P. and Valkanov, R. (2006) Predicting Volatility: Getting the Most Out of Return Data Sampled at Different Frequencies. Journal of Econometrics, 131, 59-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Engle, R.F., Ghysels, E. and Sohn, B. (2013) Stock Market Volatility and Macroeconomic Fundamentals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 776-797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Yu, X. and Huang, Y. (2021) The Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Stock Volatility: Evidence from GARCH- MIDAS Approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 570, Article ID: 125794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Riza, D., Rangan, G., He, L., et al. (2023) A Note on Financial Vulnerability and Volatility in Emerging Stock Markets: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS Models. Applied Economics Letters, 30, 37-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Anwar, A., Sharif, A., Fatima, S., Ahmad, P., Sinha, A., Khan, S.A.R. and Jermsittiparsert, K. (2021) The Asymmetric Effect of Public Private Partnership Investment on Transport CO2 Emission in China: Evidence from Quantile ARDL Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, Article ID: 125282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Huynh, T.L.D., Burggraf, T. and Nasir, M.A. (2020) Financialisation of Natural Resources & Instability Caused by Risk Transfer in Commodity Markets. Resources Policy, 66, Article ID: 101620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Jens, C.E. (2017) Political Uncertainty and Investment: Causal Evidence from US Gubernatorial Elections. Journal of Financial Economics, 124, 563-579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Oestreich, A.M. and Tsiakas, I. (2015) Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 294-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Jin, J., Han, L., Wu, L., et al. (2020) The Hedging Effect of Green Bonds on Carbon Market Risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, Article ID: 101509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef