|
[1]
|
Pawlak, Z. (1998) An Inquiry into Anatomy of Conflicts. Information Sciences, 109, 65-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Pawlak, Z. (2007) Some Remarks on Conflict Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 649-654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Lang, G.M., Miao, D.Q. and Cai, M.J. (2017) Three-Way Decision Approaches to Conflict Analysis Using Decision Theoretic Rough Set Theory. Information Sciences, 406, 185-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Sun, B.Z., Ma, W.M. and Zhao, H.Y. (2016) Rough Set-Based Conflict Analysis Model and Method over Two Universes. Information Sciences, 372, 111-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Fan, Y., Qi, J.J. and Wei, L. (2018) A Conflict Analysis Model Based on Three-Way Decisions. Proceeding of International Joint Conference on Rough Sets 2018, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, 20-24 August 2018, 522-532.
|
|
[6]
|
Yao, Y.Y. (2019) Three-Way Conflict Analysis: Reformulations and Extensions of the Pawlak Model. Knowledge- Based Systems, 180, 26-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Yager, R.R. and Abbasov, A.M. (2013) Pythagorean Member-ship Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28, 436-452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Yager, R.R. (2014) Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Deci-sion Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 958-965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Yager, R.R. (2017) Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25, 1222-1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Zhang, X.L. and Xu, Z.S. (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29, 1061-1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
李丹, 王贵军. 勾股模糊环境下海明距离测度的证明及推广[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2023, 50(4): 402-408.
|
|
[12]
|
Lang, G.M., Miao, D.Q., Zhang, Z.F. and Yao, N. (2017) Conflict Analysis for Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10314, 359-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Lang, G.M., Miao, D.Q. and Fujita, H. (2019) Three-Way Group Conflict Analysis Based on Pythagorean Fuzzy Set Theory. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28, 447-461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
Du, J.L., Liu, S.F. and Liu, Y. (2022) A Novel Approach to Three-Way Conflict Analysis and Resolution with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Information Sciences, 584, 65-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Kryszkiewicz, M. (1998) Rough Set Approach to Incomplete Infor-mation Systems. Information Sciences, 112, 39-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[16]
|
Peng, L.S., Zhou, X.Z., Zhao, J.J., et al. (2022) Three-Way Multi-Attribute Decision Making under Incomplete Mixed Environments Using Probabilistic Similarity, Information Sciences, 614, 432-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[17]
|
杨文听, 易黄建, 陈跃, 等. 基于不完备信息系统的三支冲突分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(3): 43-51.
|
|
[18]
|
Suo, L.W.Q. and Yang, H.L. (2022) Three-Way Conflict Analysis Based on Incomplete Situation Tables: A Tentative Study. International Journal of Approximate Rea-soning, 145, 51-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[19]
|
Yi, H.J., Zhang, H.M., Li, X.N. and Yang, Y.P. (2021) Three-Way Conflict Analysis Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Information Systems. International Journal of Approxi-mate Reasoning, 139, 12-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|