高管学术经历对企业研发支出资本化的影响
The Impact of Executive Academic Experience on the Capitalization of R&D Expenditure in Enterprises
摘要: 高管作为企业日常经营性事务的决策者与关键执行者,其学术经历对企业研发支出的理解、评估和决策有着深刻的影响。本文旨在研究高管学术经历对企业研发支出资本化选择的影响。基于2008年~2022年A股上市公司数据,本文发现高管学术经历显著促进了企业的研发支出资本化水平,但现金流的约束会减弱高管学术经历与研发支出资本化之间的正相关关系。
Abstract: As decision-makers and key executors of daily operational affairs in enterprises, executives’ academic experience has a profound impact on the understanding, evaluation, and decision-making of enterprise R&D expenditures. The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of executive academic experience on the choice of capitalization for corporate R&D expenditure. Based on the data of A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2022, this article finds that executive academic experience significantly promotes the level of capitalization of R&D ex-penditures, but cash flow constraints attenuate the positive correlation between executive academic experience and capitalization of R&D expenditures.
文章引用:赵荣. 高管学术经历对企业研发支出资本化的影响[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(6): 6950-6961. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.136682

参考文献

[1] 王亮亮, 王跃堂, 杨志进. 会计准则国际趋同、研究开发支出及其经济后果[J]. 财经研究, 2012, 38(2): 49-60.
[2] Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Hambrick, D.C. (2007) Upper Echelons Theory: An Up-date. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 334-343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Huang, H.W., Rose-Green, E. and Lee, C.C. (2012) CEO Age and Financial Reporting Quality. Accounting Horizons, 26, 725-740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Yim, S. (2013) The Acquisitiveness of Youth: CEO Age and Acqui-sition Behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 250-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Jenter, D. and Lewellen, K. (2015) CEO Preferences and Acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 70, 2813-2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 何瑛, 张大伟. 管理者特质、负债融资与企业价值[J]. 会计研究, 2015(8): 65-72.
[8] Gul, F.A., Srinidhi, B. and Ng, A.C. (2011) Does Board Gender Diversity Improve the In-formativeness of Stock Prices? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 51, 314-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Srinidhi, B., Gul, F.A. and Tsui, J. (2011) Female Directors and Earnings Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 1610-1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Marianne, B. and Antoinette, S. (2003) Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1169-1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 张兆国, 刘永丽, 谈多娇. 管理者背景特征与会计稳健性——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2011(7): 11-18.
[12] 黄继承, 盛明泉. 高管背景特征具有信息含量吗? [J]. 管理世界, 2013(9): 144-153, 171.
[13] Francis, B., Hasan, I. and Wu, Q. (2015) Professors in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Financial Management, 44, 547-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 周楷唐, 麻志明, 吴联生. 高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(7): 169-183.
[15] 刘凤朝, 默佳鑫, 马荣康. 高管团队海外背景对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(7): 135-147.
[16] 谢获宝, 丁龙飞, 廖珂. 海外背景董事与债务融资成本——基于董事会咨询和监督职能的中介效应[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(11): 202-211.
[17] Giannetti, M., Liao, G. and Yu, X. (2015) The Brain Gain of Corporate Boards: Evidence from China. Journal of Finance, 70, 1629-1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 杜勇, 周丽. 高管学术背景与企业金融化[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 45(6): 63-74.
[19] 宋建波, 文雯, 王德宏. 海归高管能促进企业风险承担吗——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 财贸经济, 2017, 38(12): 111-126.
[20] Güner, A.B., Malmendier, U. and Tate, G. (2008) Financial Expertise of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 323-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 姜付秀, 石贝贝, 马云飙. 董秘财务经历与盈余信息含量[J]. 管理世界, 2016(9): 161-173.
[22] 姜付秀, 黄继承. CEO财务经历与资本结构决策[J]. 会计研究, 2013(5): 27-34, 95.
[23] Malmendier, U., Tate, G. and Yan, J. (2011) Overconfidence and Early-Life Experiences: The Effect of Managerial Traits on Corporate Financial Policies. The Journal of Finance, 66, 1687-1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 王元芳, 徐业坤. 高管从军经历影响公司治理吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(1): 153-165.
[25] Benmelech, E. and Frydman, C. (2015) Military CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 43-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 赖黎, 巩亚林, 马永强. 管理者从军经历、融资偏好与经营业绩[J]. 管理世界, 2016(8): 126-136.
[27] 林晚发, 钟辉勇, 李青原. 高管任职经历的得与失?——来自债券市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018(6): 171-188.
[28] 许年行, 李哲. 高管贫困经历与企业慈善捐赠[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(12): 133-146.
[29] Cain, M.D. and McKeon, S.B. (2016) CEO Personal Risk-Taking and Corporate Policies. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 51, 139-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Sunder, J., Sunder, S.V. and Zhang, J.(2017) Pilot CEOs and Corporate Innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 209-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 何平林, 孙雨龙, 宁静, 陈亮. 高管特质、法治环境与信息披露质量[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(10): 112-128.
[32] 陈春花, 朱丽, 宋继文. 学者价值何在? 高管学术资本对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 经济管理, 2018, 40(10): 92-105.
[33] Audretsch, D.B. and Lehmann, E. (2006) Entre-preneurial Access and Absorption of Knowledge Spillovers: Strategic Board and Managerial Composition for Competitive Advantage. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 155-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Kaplan, S.N., Klebanov, M.M. and Sorensen, M. (2012) Which CEO Characteristics and Abilities Matter? Journal of Finance, 67, 973-1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Cho, C.H., Jung, J.H., Kwak, B., Lee, J. and Yoo, C.Y. (2015) Professors on the Board: Do They Contribute to Society outside the Classroom? Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 393-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V. and Rau, P.R. (2017) What Doesn’t Kill You Will Only Make You More Risk-Loving: Early-Life Disasters and CEO Behavior. Journal of Finance, 72, 167-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] 许罡, 朱卫东. 管理当局、研发支出资本化选择与盈余管理动机——基于新无形资产准则研发阶段划分的实证研究J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(9): 39-43.
[38] 黄亮华, 谢德仁. IPO前的业绩压力、现金流约束与开发支出会计政策隐性选择[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(6): 72-82, 138.
[39] Cazavan-Jeny, A., Jeanjean, T. and Joos, P. (2011) Accounting Choice and Future Performance: The Case of R&D Accounting in France. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 145-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Shah, S.Z.A., Liang, S. and Akbar, S. (2013) Interna-tional Financial Reporting Standards and the Value Relevance of R&D Expenditures: Pre and Post IFRS Analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 158-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] 王亮亮. 研发支出资本化或费用化:税收视角的解释[J]. 会计研究, 2016(9): 17-24.
[42] 张倩倩, 周铭山, 董志勇. 研发支出资本化向市场传递了公司价值吗? [J]. 金融研究, 2017(6): 176-190.
[43] 李秉祥, 雷怡瑾. 股权激励影响经理人对研发创新投资的决策吗?——基于管理防御的视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(20): 114-123.
[44] 徐辉, 周孝华, 周兵. 研发支出费用化与定向增发新股定价[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(2): 297-305.
[45] 张晓亮, 文雯, 宋建波. 学者型CEO更加自律吗?——学术经历对高管在职消费的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(2): 106-126.
[46] 谢德仁, 廖珂, 郑登津. 控股股东股权质押与开发支出会计政策隐性选择[J]. 会计研究, 2017(3): 30-38, 94.
[47] Tsoligkas, F. and Tsalavoutas, I. (2011) Value Relevance of R&D in the UK after IFRS Mandatory Implementation. Applied Financial Economics, 21, 957-967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[48] 谢德仁, 姜博, 刘永涛. 经理人薪酬辩护与开发支出会计政策隐性选择[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(1): 125-134.
[49] 宗文龙, 王睿, 杨艳俊. 企业研发支出资本化的动因研究——来自A股市场的经验证据[J]. 中国会计评论, 2009(4): 439-454.
[50] 沈华玉, 张军, 余应敏. 高管学术经历、外部治理水平与审计费用[J]. 审计研究, 2018(4): 86-94.
[51] 宋建波, 张海晴, 苏子豪. 研究开发支出资本化反映了研发水平吗——基于研发补助情境[J]. 会计研究, 2020(6): 3-23.