非内国裁决在中国的实践困境及解决路径分析

Analysis of the Practical Dilemmas and Solutions of Non-Domestic Adjudication in China

摘要: 由于我国现行的《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》均采用仲裁机构所属国的标准来判断仲裁裁决的国籍，这与《纽约公约》的地域标准存在显著不同，使得我国法院在判定境外仲裁机构在中国境内进行仲裁所作出的仲裁裁决的国籍时，面临无所适从的尴尬境地。我国目前对非内国仲裁裁决处于立法真空状态，且我国在加入《纽约公约》时所作出的互惠保留声明，使得中国法院在承认与执行非内国仲裁裁决的司法实践中面临着重重困境。本文试图对目前非内国裁决在实践中面临的困境进行分析，并根据其困境的发生原因，探寻解决实践困境的解决路径。

Abstract: Since both the current Civil Procedure Law and the Arbitration Law of China adopt the standard of the country where the arbitration institution belongs to judge the nationality of the arbitral award, which is significantly different from the regional standard of the New York Convention, the Chinese court is faced with the awkward situation of not knowing what to do when determining the nationality of the arbitral award made by an overseas arbitration institution in China. At present, China is in a legislative vacuum on the arbitration award of non-domestic countries, and the reciprocal reservation declaration made by China when it joined the New York Convention makes Chinese courts face many difficulties in the judicial practice of recognizing and implementing the arbitration award of non-domestic countries. This paper attempts to analyze the current predicament of non-domestic adjudication in practice, and according to the causes of its predicament, explore the solution path to solve the practical dilemma.