神经电生理监测联合荧光血管造影用于CEA疗效评估
CEA Efficacy Evaluation of Neuroelectrophysiological Monitoring Combined with Fluorescence Angiography
摘要: 目的:探讨在治疗颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄手术中,运用神经电生理实时监测和荧光造影辅助下的临床疗效。方法:收集2021年1月至2023年1月术中神经电生理监测联合荧光造影下行颈动脉内膜剥脱术(carotid endarterectomy, CEA)治疗的90例103侧颈动脉狭窄的临床资料,其中13例是双侧狭窄,先后接受两次手术治疗,采用经典式或者翻转式CEA,术中采用神经电生理技术监测躯体感觉诱发电位(somato sensory evoked potential, SEP)和躯体运动诱发电位(motion evoked potential, MEP)波幅的改变,使用吲哚菁绿(indocyanine green, ICG)血管造影和FLOW 800计算机整合软件分析技术,评估颈动脉斑块切除前后血管荧光显影。结果:术中神经电生理监测未见波幅异常94例,有异常监测指标9例,MEP异常检测指标6例、SEP异常检测指标7例,MEP和SEP同时出现异常检测指标4例,术后神经功能均良好,无遗留神经功能障碍病例。ICG造影均显示术侧颈动脉术后血流通畅,术后1、6个月复诊,均无遗留神经功能障碍。9例术后再狭窄,均为轻度狭窄无症状。结论:术中神经电生理监测联合荧光造影下颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄是一种实用、高效、稳妥的方法,可为术者及时反馈神经功能信息,并评估脑供血情况和组织灌注状态,术中应用ICG荧光造影对术中明确斑块位置、避免斑块残余、预防脑缺血或过度灌注有重要作用,提高手术的成功率,降低术后并发症的发生率,有效改善患者的预后。
Abstract: Aim: To investigate the clinical effect of real-time neurophysiological monitoring and fluorescein angiography in the treatment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis. Method: Clinical data of 103 carot-id artery strictures in 90 cases with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring combined with carotid endarterectomy under fluorescence angiography were collected from January 2021 to Jan-uary 2023. Among them, 13 cases were bilateral strictures, which were treated with classic or in-verted CEA. During the operation, the changes of somatosensory evoked potential and somatomotor evoked potential amplitude were monitored by neuroelectrophysiological techniques. Indocyanine green angiography and FLOW 800 computer integrated software analysis techniques were used to evaluate vascular fluorescence imaging before and after carotid plaque resection. Results: In-traoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring showed no abnormal amplitude in 94 cases, ab-normal monitoring indicators in 9 cases, abnormal MEP detection indicators in 6 cases, abnormal SEP detection indicators in 7 cases, and abnormal MEP and SEP detection indicators in 4 cases. All the postoperative neurological functions were good, and no cases of residual neurological dysfunc-tion were found. ICG angiography showed unobstructed carotid blood flow after operation, and no residual neurological dysfunction was found at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Restenosis occurred in 9 cases, all of which were mild and asymptomatic. Conclusion: Intraoperative nerve electrophysio-logical monitoring combined with carotid endarterectomy under fluorescence angiography is a practical, efficient and secure method for the treatment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis, which can provide timely feedback of nerve function information and evaluate the cerebral blood supply and tissue perfusion status. Intraoperative ICG fluorography plays an important role in determining the location of plaques, avoiding plaque residual, preventing cerebral ischemia or overperfusion, improving the success rate of surgery, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and effectively improving the prognosis of patients.
文章引用:胡赟浩, 栗世方, 唐凤娇. 神经电生理监测联合荧光血管造影用于CEA疗效评估[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(12): 19643-19654. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13122766

参考文献

[1] 高晨琛, 丰育功, 李环廷, 等. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄(附40例临床分析) [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2015, 19(6): 431-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Iadecola, C., Buckwalter, M.S. and Anrather, J. (2020) Immune Responses to Stroke: Mechanisms, Modulation, and Therapeutic Potential. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 130, 2777-2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Orrapin, S. and Rerkasem, K. (2017) Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD001081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Cheng, S.F., Brown, M.M., Simister, R.J. and Richards, T. (2019) Contemporary Prevalence of Carotid Stenosis in Patients Presenting with Ischaemic Stroke. British Journal of Surgery, 106, 872-878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 秦海林, 徐国政, 胡军民, 秦汉, 黄成. 多参数监测在颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术中的应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2022, 27(12): 983-985.
[6] Okawa, M., Abe, H., Hirata, Y., et al. (2011) Visualization of the Distal Edge of Carotid Plaque Using Indocyanine Green Vide-oangiography during Carotid Endarterectomy and the Pitfall Involved. No Shinkei Geka, 39, 563-568.
[7] 王浩, 章剑剑, 陈劲草. 基于吲哚菁绿荧光造影的FLOW800技术在神经外科手术中的应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2021, 26(1): 46-49.
[8] Barnett, H., Taylor, D.W., Haynes, R.B., et al. (1991) Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterec-tomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 445-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Minahan, R.E. (2002) Intraoperative Neuromonitoring. Neurologist, 8, 209-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 唐凤娇, 丰育功, 吴蒙蒙, 栗世方, 刘伟. 神经电生理监测在开颅动脉瘤夹闭术中的应用[J]. 现代电生理学杂志, 2021, 28(3): 135-141.
[11] 师炜, 孙振兴, 王劲, 等. 术中吲哚菁绿荧光造影在神经血管外科手术中的应用进展[J]. 转化医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(4): 29-33.
[12] 付宏亮. 人重组粒细胞集落刺激因子对大鼠急性缺血性脑梗死保护及治疗作用机制的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西医科大学, 2007.
[13] Nwachuku, E.L., Balzer, J.R., Yabes, J.G., Habeych, M.E., Crammond, D.J. and Thirumala, P.D. (2015) Diagnostic Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Changes during Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systemat-ic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurology, 72, 73-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 许晖, 董江涛, 王惠, 等. 重型颅脑损伤患者TCD、神经电生理监测对预后评价的临床研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(4): 752-755.
[15] 李莉, 吕楠, 赵瑞, 等. 神经电生理监测在脑血管疾病手术中的应用[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(4): 271-279.
[16] 曾海兰, 罗德芳, 杨瑞金, 等. 多项神经电生理监测联合应用于颈动脉内膜剥脱术的探讨[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2021, 18(24): 3604-3606.
[17] 宫达森, 崔云, 岳树源. 多模式神经电生理监测在颈动脉内膜切除术中的应用[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2018, 17(10): 1037-1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Malhotra, N.R. and Shaffrey, C.I. (2010) In-traoperative Electrophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, 2167-2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Malcharek, M.J., Kulpok, A., Deletis, V., et al. (2015) In-traoperative Multimodal Evoked Potential Monitoring during Carotid Endarterectomy: A Retrospective Study of 264 Pa-tients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 120, 1352-1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Cao, P., Giordano, G., Zannetti, S., et al. (1997) Transcra-nial Doppler Monitoring during Carotid Endarterectomy: Is It Appropriate for Selecting Patients in Need of a Shunt. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 26, 973-979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef