铁路机车乘务员心理素质模型建构
Railway Locomotive Crew’s Psychological Competency Model Construction
摘要: 本研究旨在建构机车乘务员心理素质模型,开发评估工具并提出应用建议。研究方法:在西南地区某铁路局随机抽取39名机车乘务员进行事件访谈,采用开放式编码、主轴编码等质性研究方法建构机车乘务员心理素质初步模型。编制心理素质评估题目,随机抽取1000名机车乘务员作为评估对象,对比高绩效组(前20%,175人)和普通绩效组(后80%,701人)在模型各项指标上的差异显著性。结果:1) 质性研究得出4维度17项指标的机车乘务员心理素质初步模型;2) 高绩效组和普通绩效组在3个维度12项指标差异显著;3) 最终保留89个问卷条目,个性、动机和心理健康维度的Cronbach’s alpha系数分别为0.898、0.809、0.976。KMO值为0.970 > 0.6且P < 0.05,巴特球形检验结果显著。问卷有良好的信度和结构效度。
Abstract:
This study aimed to construct a psychological competency model of a train crew, develop a meas-urement tool, and make application suggestions. Research Methods: 39 train crew members were randomly recruited for Behavioral Event Interviews from a railway bureau in Southwest China, and a preliminary model of the train crew’s psychological competency was constructed using qualitative research methods such as open coding and spindle coding. The psychological competency assess-ment questions were compiled, and 1000 drivers were randomly selected as assessment subjects to compare the significance of the differences between the high-performance group (the top 20%, 175) and the ordinary-performance group (the bottom 80%, 701) on the indicators of the model. Results: 1) The qualitative study yielded a preliminary model of the train crew’s psychological competency with 17 indicators in 4 dimensions; 2) The differences between the high-performance group and the ordinary-performance group were significant in 12 indicators in 3 dimensions; 3) 89 questionnaire entries were finally retained, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of personality, motivation, and mental health dimensions were 0.898, 0.809, and 0.976, respectively. The KMO value was 0.970 > 0.6 and P < 0.05, and Bart’s spherical test result was significant. The question-naire had good reliability and structural validity.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈燕(2013). 民航飞行学员心理素质量表的初步编制. 硕士学位论文, 德阳: 中国民用航空飞行学院.
|
|
[2]
|
高翠翠, 王燕青, 石海涛(2023). 民航空保人员职业心理素质模型建构. 职业与健康, 39(7), 865-874.
|
|
[3]
|
贾茹雪, 范文翼(2022). 应激对心理健康的影响: 心理素质的调节作用. 见 中国心理学会, 第二十四届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(pp. 2025-2026).
|
|
[4]
|
刘传星, 雷燕(2015). 心理素质研究30年: 回眸与评析. 西南大学学报: 社会科学版, 41(3), 96-100.
|
|
[5]
|
缪华灵, 郭成, 魏铭辰, 余宾, 刘丽(2023). 儿童青少年心理素质研究的特点与展望: 基于CtieSpace的可视化分析. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 49(4), 206-217.
|
|
[6]
|
曲聪, 吕凌霄, 王平才, 等(2015). 供电企业员工心理素质模型研究及应用. 见 全国电力行业企业现代化管理创新5年经典案例集(《中国电力企业管理》2015年第一期增刊) (pp. 120-123). 《中国电力企业管理》杂志社.
|
|
[7]
|
汪晓阳, 田芯(2013). 基于船员职业心理适宜性的因子结构模型构建. 浙江海洋学院学报自然科学版, 32(2), 139-143.
|
|
[8]
|
王滔, 张大均, 陈建文(2007). 我国大学生心理素质研究20年的回顾与反思. 高等教育研究, (4), 76-83
|
|
[9]
|
奚珣(2009). 电网安全关键职种心理胜任素质模型研究. 博士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
|
|
[10]
|
叶龙, 刘淑桢, 郭名(2018). 高速铁路关键岗位人员五维心理素质模型及应用研究. 中国铁路, (12), 80-85.
|
|
[11]
|
张大均, 苏志强, 王鑫强(2017). 儿童青少年心理素质研究30年: 回顾与展望. 心理与行为研究, 15(1), 3-11.
|
|
[12]
|
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
|
|
[13]
|
Zhou, J. W., Plaisent, M., Zheng, L. L., & Bernard, P. (2016). Psychological Contract, Organi-zational Commitment and Work Satisfaction: Survey of Researchers in Chinese State-Owned Engineering Research Institutions. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 217-225.[CrossRef]
|