英汉日PLEASE类敬语演化的历时比较研究
A Diachronic Comparative Study of the Development of PLEASE Honorifics in English, Chinese and Japanese
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.1112848, PDF,   
作者: 丛 溶：大连理工大学外国语学院，辽宁 大连
关键词: 语言演变；PLEASE类敬语；语法化；历时研究；Language Change； Please Honorifics； Grammaticalization； Diachronic Study
摘要: 本文基于语法化理论以及英汉日各历史时期的语料，对PLEASE类敬语演化的路径进行描述，并通过对比三者在句法、语义等不同层面上的共性和差异，解析英日汉PLEASE类敬语语法化路径出现的深层理据，发现PLEASE类敬语呈现出语义都越来越趋于程序义，句法规则越来越自由，主观化的倾向越来越强，语境层面上使用的范围越来越广等特点，得出PLEASE类敬语演变的机制是重新分析、类推、转喻和隐喻的结论。
Abstract: Based on the grammaticalization theory and the corpus of English, Chinese and Japanese from an-cient times to the present, this study describes the evolution path of PLEASE Honorifics. By com-paring the similarities and differences of PLEASE Honorifics in syntax and semantics of English, Chinese, Japanese and, and analyzing the deep motivation behind its paths, it is found that PLEASE Honorifics presents certain similarities and regularities in the evolution process. The evolution of PLEASE Honorifics is the process of grammaticalization, with the characteristics of more and more procedural semantics, more free syntactic distribution, more subjective tendency, and more and more extensive use at the context level. It is concluded that the evolution mechanism of PLEASE Honorifics is reanalysis, analogy, metonymy and metaphor.
文章引用：丛溶. 英汉日PLEASE类敬语演化的历时比较研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(12): 6332-6341. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.1112848

参考文献

[1] 张绍杰, 王晓彤. “请求”言语行为的对比研究[J]. 现代外语, 1997(3): 66+65+67-74.
[2] Traugott, E.C. and Trousdale, G. (2013) Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 金澤裕之. 「~ てくださる」 と 「~ ていただく」 Ȁついて[J]. 日本語の研究, 2007, 3(2): 47-53.
[4] 高增霞. 连动结构的隐喻层面[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2005(1): 22-31.
[5] Hopper, P.J. and Traugott, E.C. (2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Claudi, U. and Heine, B. (1986) On the Metaphorical Base of Grammar. Studies in Language, 10, 297-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. (1991) Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[8] Radden, G. and Kovecses, Z. (1999) Towards a Theory of Metonymy. In: Panther, K.U. and Radden, G., Eds., Metonymy in Language and Thought, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 91-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]