安溪县土壤侵蚀空间格局的土地利用因素分析及防治对策研究
Analysis of Land Use Factors in the Spatial Pattern of Soil Erosion and Countermeasure Research in Anxi County
摘要: 土壤侵蚀问题会对区域土地利用的可持续性发展造成不良影响。通过综合应用遥感技术和地理信息系统(GIS),对2020年安溪县的土壤侵蚀强度进行了定量评估,分析了不同土地利用类型对土壤侵蚀空间格局的影响,以及相应的防治措施。结果表明,安溪县土壤侵蚀的空间分布与土地利用类型密切相关,茶园和建设用地是土壤侵蚀最为严重的区域。提出了通过实施差异化的土地利用管理和水土保持措施的建议,促进安溪县土地资源的可持续利用和区域生态平衡的维护。
Abstract:
Soil erosion poses adverse effects on the sustainable development of regional land use. This study conducts a quantitative assessment of the soil erosion intensity in Anxi County for the year 2020 by integrating remote sensing technology and Geographic Information System (GIS). It analyzes the impact of different land use types on the spatial pattern of soil erosion and the corresponding mitigation measures. The results reveal that the spatial distribution of soil erosion in Anxi County is closely related to land use types, with tea plantations and construction lands being the most severely eroded areas. The study suggests implementing differentiated land use management and soil and water conservation measures to promote the sustainable use of land resources and maintain the ecological balance of the region.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
江文甲, 林满红, 翁佩莹, 等. 福建省安溪县土地利用时空演变规律及其关键驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(2): 513-527.
|
|
[2]
|
吴思颖, 汪小钦, 曾舒娇, 等. 基于CSLE的安溪县土壤侵蚀估算与分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4): 112-121.
|
|
[3]
|
程馨瑢, 胡月明, 刘振华, 等. 基于遥感数据改进修正通用土壤流失方程的广州市土壤侵蚀定量研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(3): 559-568.
|
|
[4]
|
赵娟, 杨胜权, 刘春艳, 等. 县级水土保持规划防治模式及措施配置——以六盘水市水城区为例[J]. 中国水土保持, 2023(11): 56-59.
|
|
[5]
|
唐德武, 孙庆春. 六安市金安区水土流失分布特征及防治对策研究[J]. 治淮, 2023(9): 107-108.
|
|
[6]
|
欧阳玉莹, 陈沐晨, 史文妍, 等. 长乐区水土流失动态分析及防治对策探讨[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2023, 35(2): 16-20.
|
|
[7]
|
Belgiu, M. and Drăguţ, L. (2016) Random Forest in Remote Sensing: A Review of Applications and Future Directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Zhang, H., Zhang, R., Qi, F., et al. (2018) The CSLE Model Based Soil Erosion Prediction: Comparisons of Sampling Density and Extrapolation Method at the County Level. CATENA, 165, 465-472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|