APACHE-II评分联合BISAP评分及血清淀粉样蛋白A对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值
Predictive Value of APACHE-II Score Combined with BISAP Score and Serum Amyloid A for the Severity of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13122875, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李少敏:安徽医科大学附属合肥医院(合肥市第二人民医院),重症医学科,安徽 合肥;安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽 合肥;王自成, 许季翔, 刘 骁, 韩肖晓:安徽医科大学附属合肥医院(合肥市第二人民医院),高压氧科,安徽 合肥 ;周小妹*:安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽 合肥;安徽医科大学附属合肥医院(合肥市第二人民医院),高压氧科,安徽 合肥
关键词: 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎APACHE-II评分BISAP评分血清淀粉样蛋白AHyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis APACHE-II Score BISAP Score Serum Amyloid A
摘要: 目的:评估APACHE-II评分联合BISAP评分及血清淀粉样蛋白A (serum amyloid A, SAA)对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎(hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis, HLAP)严重程度的预测价值。方法:收集2020年1月至2022年12月首诊于安徽医科大学附属合肥医院的192例HLAP患者进行回顾性分析研究。将入组患者按照病情严重程度分为2组:轻症HLAP组(123例)和中重症HLAP组(69例)。比较两组患者的一般资料、APACHE-II评分和BISAP评分以及入院即刻血清淀粉样蛋白A (SAA)等多项实验室指标,采用多因素二元logistic回归分析筛选出中重症HLAP的独立危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(receiver op-erating characteristic, ROC)曲线评价APACHE-II评分联合BISAP评分及SAA的临床预测效果。结果:APACHE-II评分(OR = 1.424, P = 0.002)、BISAP评分(OR = 2.289, P = 0.024)及SAA (OR = 0.042, P = 0.006)均为中重症HLAP的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。APACHE-II评分预测中重症HLAP的灵敏度及特异度均为79.7%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.872 (P < 0.05);SAA预测中重症HLAP的灵敏度及特异度分别为84.6%、82.6%,AUC为0.870 (P < 0.05);BISAP评分预测中重症HLAP患者的灵敏度及特异度分别为82.9%,62.7%,AUC为0.818 (P < 0.05)。三项指标联合后预测中重症HLAP患者的灵敏度及特异度分别为87.0%、95.7%,AUC为0.962 (P < 0.05)。结论:APACHE-II、BISAP评分及SAA与HLAP患者严重程度呈正相关,且联合该三项指标对中重症HLAP有较高的预测价值。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of APACHE-II score combined with BISAP score and se-rum amyloid A (SAA) for the severity of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis (HLAP). Methods: A total of 192 patients with HLAP who were first diagnosed in Hefei Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to the severity of illness: mild HLAP group (123 patients) and mod-erate to severe HLAP group (69 patients). A number of laboratory parameters such as general data, APACHE-II score and BISAP score, and serum amyloid A (SAA) immediately after admission were compared between the two groups, and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent risk factors for moderate to severe HLAP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the clinical predictive effect of APACHE-II score combined with BISAP score and SAA. Results: APACHE-II score (OR = 1.424, P = 0.002), BISAP score (OR = 2.289, P = 0.024) and SAA (OR = 0.042, P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for moderate to severe HLAP (P < 0.05). APACHE-II score predicted moderate to severe HLAP with a sensitivity and speci-ficity of 79.7% and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.872 (P < 0.05); SAA predicted severe HLAP with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 82.6% and an AUC of 0.870 (P < 0.05); and BISAP score predicted moderate to severe HLAP with a sensitivity and specificity of 82.9% and 62.7% and an AUC of 0.818 (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of the three indicators in predicting patients with moderate to severe HLAP were 87.0% and 95.7%, respec-tively, and the AUC was 0.962 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: APACHE-II, BISAP score and SAA are positively correlated with the severity of HLAP, and the combination of these three indicators has a high pre-dictive value for moderate and severe HLAP.
文章引用:李少敏, 王自成, 许季翔, 刘骁, 韩肖晓, 周小妹. APACHE-II评分联合BISAP评分及血清淀粉样蛋白A对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(12): 20416-20425. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13122875

参考文献

[1] Leppäniemi, A., Tolonen, M., Tarasconi, A., et al. (2019) 2019 WSES Guidelines for the Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14, Article No. 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Jin, M., Bai, X., Chen, X., et al. (2019) A 16-Year Trend of Eti-ology in Acute Pancreatitis: The Increasing Proportion of Hypertriglyceridemia-Associated Acute Pancreatitis and Its Adverse Effect on Prognosis. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 13, 947-953.E1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 杜奕奇, 陈其奎, 李宏宇, 等. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2019年,沈阳) [J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(12): 2706-2711.
[4] 宏欣, 王立明, 张正良, 等. 高甘油三酯血症性急性胰腺炎诊治急诊专家共识[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(30): 3781-3793.
[5] Schepers, N.J., Bakker, O.J., Besselink, M.G., et al. (2019) Impact of Characteristics of Organ Failure and Infected Necrosis on Mortality in Necrotising Pancrea-titis. Gut, 68, 1044-1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Bálint, E.R., Fűr, G., Kiss, L., et al. (2020) Assessment of the Course of Acute Pancreatitis in the Light of Aetiology: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 17936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 安文慧, 何旭昶, 杨婧, 等. 入院早期评分系统对急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(6): 1342-1346.
[8] 羊琦, 黄宁, 吴万春. 四种评分系统对中重度高脂血症性急性胰腺炎的预测价值[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2021, 42(15): 1307-1310.
[9] Wu, B.U., Johannes, R.S., Sun, X., Tabak, Y., Conwell, D.L. and Banks, P.A. (2008) The Early Prediction of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Large Population-Based Study. Gut, 57, 1698-1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Pando, E., Alberti, P., Mata, R., et al. (2021) Early Changes in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Can Predict Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: Comparative Study between BISAP Score, APACHE-II, and Other Laboratory Markers—A Prospective Observational Study. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterol-ogy and Hepatology, 2021, Article ID: 6643595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 赵凯, 章阳. 血清淀粉样蛋白A、CRP和PCT水平预测高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的临床价值[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2021, 28(2): 268-272.
[12] 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2021) [J]. 浙江实用医学, 2021, 26(6): 511-519, 535.
[13] Banks, P.A., Bollen, T.L., Dervenis, C., et al. (2013) Classification of Acute Pancreatitis—2012: Revision of the Atlanta Classi-fication and Definitions by International Consensus. Gut, 62, 102-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 陆秀仙, 覃玉桃. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎病因、发病机制及严重程度评估研究新进展[J]. 海南医学, 2023, 34(13): 1959-1962.
[15] 李成, 王丽, 李建红, 等. 血清甘油三酯与IL-6及APACHE-II评分对重症急性胰腺炎患者感染及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(20): 3125-3129.
[16] 金秋, 杨婧, 马红琳, 等. 不同评分系统预测高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的价值分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(11): 2551-2557.
[17] Wu, Q., Wang, J., Qin, M., Yang, H., Liang, Z. and Tang, G. (2021) Accuracy of Conventional and Novel Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study. Lipids in Health and Disease, 20, Article No. 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 朱长举, 刘艳娜, 程波, 等. 急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数评分联合D-二聚体对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2020, 40(10): 952-955.
[19] 陈宇, 李响, 宁佳曦, 等. 高脂血症性急性胰腺炎的临床特征及其并发全身炎症反应综合征的预测[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2023, 28(3): 300-304.
[20] Qiu, L., Sun, R.Q., Jia, R.R., et al. (2015) Comparison of Existing Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting Severity and Prognoses of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Patients: A Retrospective Study. Medicine, 94, e957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Sheng, H., Li, H. and Wang, R. (2019) Acute Phase Reactant Serum Amyloid A in Inflammation and Other Diseases. Advances in Clinical Chemistry, 90, 25-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Faiz Karim, A., et al. (2018) Implications of Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Levels in IgG4-Related Disease: Comment on the Article by Perugino et al. Arthritis Care & Research, 70, 317-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 邱雷, 危贵君. 高脂血症性及非高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者临床特点及血清淀粉样蛋白A对其严重程度预测价值[J]. 中国现代医生, 2023, 61(11): 52-56.