肝脏右后叶脉管解剖分型及其变异
Anatomical Typing of the Right Posterior Lobe Vein of the Liver and Its Variations
摘要: Couinaud’s分段法将肝脏划分为“五叶八段”。其中,由于右后叶在肝脏所占的体积较大,可达整个肝脏体积的24.7%,同时因为其解剖变异较复杂,因此在肝胆外科手术中具有重要价值。根据Fisher和Couinaud提出的门静脉解剖分型,分为三种不同的分支模式:I型、II型和III型。I型分支模式被认为是门静脉的标准分支模式。约有65.0%至89.1%发生率。II型和III型被分为变异分型,分别有4.5%至11.1%和2.6%至23.5%的发生率。门静脉右后支被分为“弓形”(arch-like)、“二分叉型”、“三分叉型”,分别有32%至63%、27.9%至37.6%、2%至6%的发生率。右后肝动脉(RPHA)的走行路径在解剖学上主要有三种类型,“南绕型”(门静脉下型)、“北绕型”(门静脉上型)、“混合型”,其发生率分别为75.8%~79.7%,7.3%~11.7%,以及8.7%~12.1%。右后肝内胆管同样分为“南绕型”(门静脉下型)、“北绕型”(门静脉上型)、“混合型”,其发生率分别为82.7%~92.9%,7.1%~12.7%,3.2%~5.5%。对于肝脏右后叶的血管和胆管结构的深入理解,以及对其解剖变异的准确识别,对于提高手术效果,减少术中并发症,提高患者的生存质量和生存期具有重要的临床意义。
Abstract: Couinaud’s segmentation method divides the liver into “five lobes and eight segments”. Among them, the right posterior lobe is of great value in hepatobiliary surgery because of its large volume in the liver, which can be up to 24.7% of the whole liver volume, and because of its complex ana-tomical variations. According to the anatomical typing of the portal vein proposed by Fisher and Couinaud, it is categorized into three different branching patterns: type I, type II, and type III. Type I branching pattern is considered the standard branching pattern of the portal vein. It has an inci-dence of approximately 65.0% to 89.1%. Type II and type III are categorized as variant branching patterns with an incidence of 4.5% to 11.1% and 2.6% to 23.5%, respectively. The right posterior branch of the portal vein was categorized as “arch-like”, “bifurcation”, and “trifurcation”, occurring in 32% to 63%, 27.9% to 37.6%, and 2% to 23.5%, respectively. 37.6%, and 2% to 6%, respective-ly. The right posterior hepatic artery (RPHA) has three main anatomical types of travel paths, “southern bypass” (subportal type), “northern bypass” (supraportal type), and “mixed type”, with incidence rates of 75.8%~79.7%, 7.3%~11.7%, and 8.7%~12.1%, respectively. Right posterior in-trahepatic bile ducts were also categorized as “southern bypass type” (subportal type), “northern bypass type” (supraportal type), and “mixed type”, with incidences of 82.7%~92.9%, 7.1%~12.7%, 3.2%~5.7%, 3.2%~12.7%, and 3.2%~5.7%, respectively, and 3.2%~5.5%, respectively. An in-depth understanding of the vascular and biliary structure of the right posterior lobe of the liver and accurate identification of its anatomical variants are of great clinical significance in improving surgical outcomes, reducing intraoperative complications, and improving the quality and survival of patients.
文章引用:李迎博, 王海久. 肝脏右后叶脉管解剖分型及其变异[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(12): 20432-20441. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13122877

参考文献

[1] Erbay, N., Raptopoulos, V., Pomfret, E.A., Kamel, I.R. and Kruskal, J.B. (2003) Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: Vascular Variants Important in Surgical planning for Donors and Recipients. American Journal of Roentgenology, 181, 109-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Couinaud, C. (1981) Controlled Hepatectomies and Exposure of the Intrahepatic Bile Ducts: Anatomical and Technical Study. Couinaud, Paris, 14.
[3] Mise, Y., Satou, S., Shindoh, J., Conrad, C., Aoki, T., Hasegawa, K., Sugawara, Y. and Kokudo, N. (2014) Three-Dimen- sional Volumetry in 107 Normal Livers Reveals Clinically Relevant Inter-Segment Variation in Size. HPB (Oxford), 16, 439-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Fraser-Hill, M.A., Atri, M., Bret, P.M., Aldis, A.E., Illescas, F.F. and Herschorn, S.D. (1990) Intrahepatic Portal Venous System: Variations Demonstrated with Duplex and Color Doppler US. Radiology, 177, 523-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Couinaud, C. (1957) The Hepatic Pedicle. I. The Intrahepatic Portal Vein. In: Couinaud, C., Ed., The Liver: Anatomic and Surgical Studies, Masson, Paris, 71-118. (In French)
[6] Atri, M., Bret, P.M. and Fraser-Hill, M.A. (1992) Intrahepatic Portal Venous Variations: Prevalence with US. Radiology, 184, 157-158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 林江, 陈祖望, 周康荣, 等. 肝内门静脉和肝静脉的解剖与变异(三维动态增强磁共振血管成像分析) [J]. 中华放射学杂志, 1999, 33(6): 403-406.
[8] Baba, Y., Hokotate, H., Nishi, H., Inoue, H. and Nakajo, M. (2000) Intrahepatic Portal Venous Varia-tions: Demonstration by Helical CT during Arterial Portography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 24, 802-808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Akgul, E., Inal, M., Soyupak, S., Binokay, F., Aksungur, E. and Oguz, M. (2002) Portal Venous Variations. Prevalence with Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT. Acta Radiologica, 43, 315-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Varotti, G., Gondolesi, G.E., Goldman, J., Wayne, M., Florman, S.S., Schwartz, M.E., Miller, C.M. and Sukru, E. (2004) Anatomic Variations in Right Liver Living Donors. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 198, 577-582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Covey, A.M., Brody, L.A., Getrajdman, G.I., Sofocleous, C.T. and Brown, K.T. (2004) Incidence, Patterns, and Clinical Relevance of Variant Portal Vein Anatomy. American Journal of Roentgenology, 183, 1055-1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Koç, Z., Oğuzkurt, L. and Ulusan, S. (2007) Portal Vein Variations: Clinical Implications and Frequencies in Routine Abdominal Multidetector CT. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 13, 75-80.
[13] Sureka, B., Patidar, Y., Bansal, K., Rajesh, S., Agrawal, N. and Arora, A. (2015) Portal Vein Varia-tions in 1000 Patients: Surgical and Radiological Importance. The British Journal of Radiology, 88, Article 20150326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Watanabe, N., Ebata, T., Yokoyama, Y., Igami, T., Sugawara, G., Mi-zuno, T., Yamaguchi, J. and Nagino, M. (2017) Anatomic Features of Independent Right Posterior Portal Vein Variants: Implications for Left Hepatic Trisectionectomy. Surgery, 161, 347-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Couinaud, C. (1989) Surgical Anatomy of the Liver Revisited. Couinaud, Paris, 1-182.
[16] Hata, F., Hirata, K., Murakami, G. and Mukaiya, M. (1999) Identification of Segments VI and VII of the Liver Based on the Ramification Patterns of the Intrahepatic Portal and Hepatic Veins. Clinical Anatomy, 12, 229-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Minami, T., Ebata, T., Yokoyama, Y., Igami, T., Mizuno, T., Yamaguchi, J., Onoe, S., Watanabe, N. and Nagino, M. (2020) Study on the Segmentation of the Right Posterior Sector of the Liver. World Journal of Surgery, 44, 896-901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Ichida, H., Imamura, H., Yoshioka, R., Mizuno, T., Mise, Y., Kuwatsuru, R., Kawasaki, S. and Saiura, A. (2021) Re- Evaluation of the Couinaud Classification for Segmental Anato-my of the Right Liver, with Particular Attention to the Relevance of Cranio-Caudal Boundaries. Surgery, 169, 333-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kinoshita, H., Sakai, K., Hirohashi, K., Tsuji, Y., Inoue, T., Kubo, S. and Nakatsuka, H. (1988) Branching Patterns of the Intrahepatic Portal Vein and Hepatic Segments Identified by Per-cutaneous Transhepatic Portography. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 89, 55-62. (In Japanese)
[20] Li, J.Y., Dai, W.D., Hu, J.X., Huang, J.S., Liu, X.L., Xiao, M.J., Xiao, E.H., Li, Y.J., Mei, X.L., Deng, K. and Shi, J.C. (2022) Newly Found Variations of the Right Posterior Portal Vein Identified Radiologically in 1,003 Chinese Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10, Article 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Takayasu, K., Moriyama, N., Muramatsu, Y., Shima, Y., Goto, H. and Yamada, T. (1985) Intrahepatic Portal Vein Branches Stud-ied by Percutaneous Transhepatic Portography. Radiology, 154, 31-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Yoshioka, Y., Ebata, T., Yokoyama, Y., Igami, T., Sugawara, G. and Nagino, M. (2011) “Supraportal” Right Posterior Hepatic Artery: An Anatomic Trap in Hepatobiliary and Trans-plant Surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 1340-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Aoki, S., Mizuma, M., Hayashi, H., Nakagawa, K., Morikawa, T., Motoi, F., Naitoh, T., Egawa, S. and Unno, M. (2016) Surgical Anatomy of the Right Hepatic Artery in Rouviere’s Sul-cus Evaluated by Preoperative Multidetector-Row CT Images. BMC Surgery, 16, Article No. 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Choi, J.W., Kim, T.K., Kim, K.W., Kim, A.Y., Kim, P.N., Ha, H.K. and Lee, M.G. (2003) Anatomic Variation in Intrahepatic Bile Ducts: An Analysis of Intraoperative Cholangio-grams in 300 Consecutive Donors for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Korean Journal of Radiology, 4, 85-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ohkubo, M., Nagino, M., Kamiya, J., Yuasa, N., Oda, K., Arai, T., Nishio, H. and Nimura, Y. (2004) Surgical Anatomy of the Bile Ducts at the Hepatic Hilum as Applied to Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 239, 82-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Shimizu, H., Sawada, S., Kimura, F., Yoshidome, H., Ohtsuka, M., Kato, A. and Miyazaki, M. (2009) Clinical Significance of Biliary Vascular Anatomy of the Right Liver for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Applied to Left Hemihepatectomy. Annals of Surgery, 249, 435-439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Jeon, Y.M., Lee, K.W., Yi, N.J., Lee, J.M., Hong, G., Choi, Y., Park, M.S., Kim, H. and Suh, K.S. (2013) The Right Posterior Bile Duct Anatomy of the Donor Is Important in Bili-ary Complications of the Recipients after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 257, 702-707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Takeishi, K., Shirabe, K., Yoshida, Y., Tsutsui, Y., Kurihara, T., Kimura, K., Itoh, S., Harimoto, N., Yamashita, Y.I., Ikegami, T., Yoshizumi, T., Nishie, A. and Maehara, Y. (2015) Correlation between Portal Vein Anatomy and Bile Duct Variation in 407 Living Liver Donors. American Journal of Transplantation, 15, 155-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Schmidt, S., Demartines, N., Soler, L., Schnyder, P. and Denys, A. (2008) Portal Vein Normal Anatomy and Variants: Implication for Liver Surgery and Portal Vein Embolization. Seminars in In-terventional Radiology, 25, 86-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]