高温覆压下顶板泥岩孔渗变化特征研究
Research on the Variation Characteristics of Porosity and Permeability of Roof Mudstone under High Temperature and Overburden Pressures
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2023.454050, PDF,   
作者: 孔令峰:中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东 青岛;中国石油天然气集团有限公司发展计划部,北京;徐加放:中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东 青岛;非常规油气开发教育部重点实验室(中国石油大学(华东)),山东 青岛;赵宇峰, 东振:中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京
关键词: 高温岩石渗透率泥岩三轴试验孔渗模型High-Temperature Rock Permeability Mudstone Triaxial Test Porosity-Permeability Modeling
摘要: 煤炭地下气化中气化腔密闭性十分重要,因此需要对高温下气化腔顶板泥岩的孔渗变化特征进行研究。本研究采用三轴应力的岩石孔渗测试装置对顶板泥岩的孔隙度、气体渗透率和水渗渗透率进行测试。结果表明:泥岩的孔隙度随温度的升高而升高,破坏前随轴压的升高也略有提高;泥岩的渗透率整体同样随温度的升高而升高,随围压升高而略有降低,随轴向应力的增大,在破坏前通常略有降低,在试样破坏时突然增大;由于滑脱效应的存在,泥岩气体渗透率往往比水渗渗透率大2~5倍。通过对比常用的孔渗模型对实验数据进行拟合,发现利用二次多项式拟合不同温度和应力下顶板泥岩的孔隙度和渗透率更便于后续的应用。
Abstract: The confinement of the gasification cavity is very important in the underground coal gasification, so it is necessary to study the porosity and permeability variation characteristics of the mudstone at the top plate of the gasification cavity at high temperatures. In this study, the porosity, gas permeability and water seepage permeability of the roof mudstone were tested using rock porosity and permeability testing system under triaxial stress. The results show that: the porosity of mudstone increases with the increase of temperature, and slightly increases with the increase of axial pressure before damage; the overall permeability of mudstone also increases with the increase of temperature, and slightly decreases with the increase of confining pressure, and with the increase of axial stress, it usually decreases slightly before the damage, and suddenly increases during the damage of the sample; due to the existence of the sliding off effect, the gas permeability of mudstone tends to be 2~5 times larger than the water seepage permeability. By comparing the common pore-permeability models to fit the experimental data, it is found that quadratic polynomials are more convenient to use to fit the porosity and permeability of the roof mudstone under different temperatures and stresses for subsequent applications.
文章引用:孔令峰, 徐加放, 赵宇峰, 东振. 高温覆压下顶板泥岩孔渗变化特征研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2023, 45(4): 403-420. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2023.454050

参考文献

[1] [1] Somerton, W.H., Mehta, M.M. and Dean, G.W. (1965) Thermal Alteration of Sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 17, 589-593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Randolph, P.L., Soeder, D.J. and Chowdiah, P. (1984) Porosity and Permeability of Tight Sands. SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, OnePetro. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 庞留法. 变有效应力条件下致密砂岩声波特性实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(4): 1-5.
[4] 王建美, 冯增朝, 毛瑞彪, 等. 应力作用下煤储层气液两相渗流实验研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2015, 34(12): 140-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 巢志明, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 等. 不同饱和度砂岩渗透率、孔隙度随应力变化规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(3): 665-680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 曾平, 赵金洲, 李治平, 等. 温度, 有效应力和含水饱和度对低渗透砂岩渗透率影响的实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 31-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 张渊, 万志军, 康建荣, 等. 温度, 三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3): 677-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 张渊, 赵阳升, 万志军, 等. 不同温度条件下孔隙压力对长石细砂岩渗透率影响试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(1): 53-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 赵阳升, 万志军, 张渊, 等. 20 MN伺服控制高温高压岩体三轴试验机的研制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(1): 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李学成, 冯增朝, 郭纪哲, 等. 温度和应力对砂岩渗透率影响规律研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(4): 96-100.
[11] 高红梅, 兰永伟, 赵继涛, 等. 温度和应力耦合条件下岩石渗透规律实验研究[C]//第十一届全国渗流力学学术大会. 第十一届全国渗流力学学术大会论文集. 重庆: 中国力学学会, 中国石油学会, 中国岩石力学与工程学会, 中国煤炭学会, 2011.
[12] 刘均荣, 秦积舜, 吴晓东. 温度对岩石渗透率影响的实验研究[J]. 石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2001, 25(4): 51-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Heard, H.C. (1980) Thermal Expansion and Inferred Permeability of Climax Quartz Monzonite to 300˚C and 27.6 MPa. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences &Geomechanics Abstracts, 17, 289-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Morrow, C., et al. (1981) Permeability of Granite in a Temperature Gradient. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86, 3002-3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Casse, F.J. and Ramey, H.J. (1979) The Effect of Temperature and Confining Pressure on Single-Phase Flow in Consolidated Rocks (Includes Associated Paper 9087). Journal of Petroleum Technology, 31, 1051-1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Worthington, P.F. (2008) A Diagnostic Approach to Quantifying the Stress Sensitivity of Permeability. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 61, 49-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Simpson, G., Guéguen, Y. and Schneider, F. (2001) Permeability Enhancement due to Microcrack Dilatancy in the Damage Regime. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Simpson, G., Guéguen, Y. and Schneider, F. (2003) Analytical Model for Permeability Evolution in Microcracking Rock. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 999-1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 张培森, 赵成业, 侯季群, 等. 温度-应力-渗流耦合条件下红砂岩渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(10): 1957-1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 刘德旺, 刘洋, 赵春虎. 泥岩全破坏过程中渗透特性试验研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2015, 35(1): 78-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 曾志姣, 李小春, 石露, 等. 泥岩和砂岩的渗透率随围压变化特性的对比[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2015, 31(4): 1-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Herron, M.M. (1987) Estimating the Intrinsic Permeability of Clastic Sediments from Geochemical Data. Spwla Logging Symposium, Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.
[23] Gardner, W.R. (1961) Physics of Flow through Porous Media. Mecnica De Fluídos, 53, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 杨建, 陈家军, 杨周喜, 等. 松散砂粒孔隙结构、孔隙分形特征及渗透率研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2008(3): 93-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 李世平, 李玉寿, 吴振业. 岩石全应力应变过程对应的渗透率——应变方程[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1995, 17(2): 13-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 范学平, 徐向荣. 地应力对岩心渗透率伤害实验及机理分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(2): 117-119.
[27] 高旺来, 何顺利. 迪那2气藏地层压力变化对储层渗透率的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 30(4): 86-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 梁冰, 高红梅, 兰永伟. 岩石渗透率与温度关系的理论分析和试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(12): 2009-2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef