脓毒性休克容量反应性评估的研究进展
Advances in Volume Responsiveness Assessment for Septic Shock
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.141006, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王 立:新疆医科大学第一附属医院急救创伤中心?急救重症监护室,新疆 乌鲁木齐;新疆医科大学第一临床医学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;彭 鹏*:新疆医科大学第一附属医院急救创伤中心?急救重症监护室,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 脓毒性休克液体复苏容量反应性Septic Shock Fluid Resuscitation Volume Responsiveness
摘要: 脓毒症是一种发病率和死亡率都较高的疾病,其并发脓毒性休克已成为危重症患者死亡的主要原因。脓毒性休克治疗的一个重要方面是液体复苏,是基于增加心脏前负荷来增加心输出量,从而增加全身灌注并减少器官功能障碍。在液体复苏过程中,有效、及时、准确地评估容量状态及容量反应性十分重要,可以改善患者预后。选择合理有效的血流动力学指标来评估容量状态及其反应性也显得尤为重要,也是临床医生关注的重点。本文对脓毒性休克容量管理的研究进展作一综述,以期为脓毒症患者的容量管理提供参考。
Abstract: Sepsis is a disease with high morbidity and mortality, and its complication, septic shock, has be-come the leading cause of death in critically ill patients. An important aspect of septic shock treat-ment is fluid resuscitation, which is based on increasing cardiac preload to increase cardiac output, thereby increasing systemic perfusion and reducing organ dysfunction. During fluid resuscitation, effective, timely and accurate assessment of volume status and volume responsiveness is important and can improve patient prognosis. Choosing reasonable and effective haemodynamic indexes to assess volume status and its responsiveness is also particularly important and is the focus of clini-cians’ attention. This article provides a review of the research progress of volume management in septic shock, with a view to providing reference for the volume management of septic patients.
文章引用:王立, 彭鹏. 脓毒性休克容量反应性评估的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(1): 36-41. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.141006

参考文献

[1] 吕慧, 陈道南, 田锐, 等. 红细胞压积和抗凝血酶III联合APACHE II评分在老年脓毒症患者90天预后中的评估价值[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2022, 28(6): 1181-1186.
[2] 余长升, 马艳红, 辛晓婷. 降钙素原、C反应蛋白清除率对脓毒性休克患者的预后价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2020, 21(6): 482-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 邵卫卫, 彭文清, 徐月文. 休克患者快速补液试验前后应用重症超声检测左室流出道速度时间积分及校正血流时间的临床意义[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(1): 6-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Xie, J., Wang, H., Kang, Y., Zhou, L., Liu, Z., Qin, B., Ma, X., Cao, X., Chen, D., Lu, W., Yao, C., Yu, K., Yao, X., Shang, H., Qiu, H., Yang, Y. and Chinese Epi-demiological Study of Sepsis (CHESS) Study Investigators (2020) The Epidemiology of Sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A Na-tional Cross-Sectional Survey. Critical Care Medicine, 48, e209-e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 王喜梅, 明志浩, 尹辉明, 等. 脓毒血症的流行病学与临床治疗进展[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(15): 3597-3600.
[6] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 中国研究型医院学会休克与脓毒症专业委员会. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018) [J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(9): 741-756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 姚咏明, 张艳敏. 脓毒症发病机制最新认识[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2017, 30(7): 678-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 李玉婷, 李洪祥, 张东, 等. 脓毒性休克患者容量过负荷的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(5): 524-528.
[9] 周飞虎, 刘超, 毛智, 等. 重症患者的液体复苏策略[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2017, 42(2): 109-116.
[10] Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., Tomlanovich, M. and Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group (2001) Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1368-1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 黄伟, 秦永新. 2018国际重症医学回顾与展望[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2019, 31(1): 16-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Bakker, J., Kattan, E., Annane, D., Castro, R., Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Dubin, A., Evans, L., Gong, M.N., Hamzaoui, O., Ince, C., Levy, B., Monnet, X., Ospina Tascón, G.A., Ostermann, M., Pinsky, M.R., Russell, J.A., Saugel, B., Scheeren, T.W.L., Teboul, J.L., Vieillard Baron, A., Vincent, J.L., Zampieri, F.G. and Hernandez, G. (2022) Current Practice and Evolving Concepts in Septic Shock Resuscitation. Intensive Care Medicine, 48, 148-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 乔志飞, 刘春艳, 王磊, 等. 床旁心脏超声联合被动抬腿试验在感染性休克患者容量反应性评估中的应用价值探讨[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(5): 395-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 陈娇, 项龙, 柏振江, 等. 容量超负荷对严重脓毒症患儿死亡的预测价值[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2016, 31(10): 755-759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 何川, 何培芳. Frank-Starling心脏定律的证明方法探讨[J]. 西部医学, 2013, 25(3): 348-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 尤勇, 虞文魁. 感染性休克液体复苏治疗[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(6): 628-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 齐文旗, 张斌, 郑忠骏, 等. 拯救脓毒症运动: 2021年国际脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理指南[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1300-1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kim, E.H., Lee, J.H., Jang, Y.E., Ji, S.H., Kim, H.S., Cho, S.A. and Kim, J.T. (2021) Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Lung Recruitment Manoeuvre in Paedi-atric Patients Receiving Lung-Protective Ventilation: A Prospective Observational Study. European Journal of Anaesthe-siology, 38, 452-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Myatra, S.N., Prabu, N.R., Divatia, J.V., Monnet, X., Kul-karni, A.P. and Teboul, J.L. (2017) The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation after a “Tidal Volume Challenge” Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness during Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Critical Care Medicine, 45, 415-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Liu, Y., Wei, L.Q., Li, G.Q., Yu, X., Li, G.F. and Li, Y.M. (2016) Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather than by Tidal Volume, Re-liably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Critical Care Medicine, 44, 342-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 裴颖皓, 杨洋, 冯颖, 何淑寅, 周江, 蒋华, 王醒. 床旁即时超声测量动脉峰流速呼吸变异度评价危重症患者容量反应性的Meta分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2020, 32(1): 99-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Orso, D., Paoli, I., Piani, T., Cilenti, F.L., Cristiani, L. and Guglielmo, N. (2020) Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Inferior Vena Cava to Determine Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 35, 354-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Millington, S.J. and Koenig, S. (2021) Ultrasound Assessment of the Inferior Vena Cava for Fluid Responsiveness: Making the Case for Skepticism. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 36, 1223-1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Vignon, P., Repessé, X., Bégot, E., Léger, J., Jacob, C., Boufer-rache, K., Slama, M., Prat, G. and Vieillard-Baron, A. (2017) Comparison of Echocardiographic Indices Used to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 195, 1022-1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Chaudhuri, D., Herritt, B., Lewis, K., Diaz-Gomez, J.L., Fox-Robichaud, A., Ball, I., Granton, J. and Rochwerg, B. (2021) Dosing Fluids in Early Septic Shock. Chest, 159, 1493-1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Mallat, J., Fischer, M.O., Granier, M., Vinsonneau, C., Jonard, M., Mahjoub, Y., Baghdadi, F.A., Préau, S., Poher, F., Rebet, O., Bouhemad, B., Lemyze, M., Marzouk, M., Besnier, E., Hamed, F., Rahman, N., Abou-Arab, O. and Guinot, P.G. (2022) Passive Leg Raising-Induced Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation to Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Multicentre Prospective Observational Study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 129, 308-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sivakorn, C., Schultz, M.J. and Dondorp, A.M. (2021) How to Monitor Cardiovascular Function in Critical Illness in Resource-Limited Settings. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 27, 274-281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef