教唆自杀行为可罚性之证成
The Proof of the Punishable Act of Abetting Suicide
摘要: 教唆自杀热点事件的频发使得该行为的社会危害性逐渐浮出水面,我国现有立法中并无明确规定对其进行有效遏制,对该行为是否具有可罚性也在学术界存在较大争议。考察域外有关“教唆自杀行为”相关立法,发现绝大多数国家和地区将教唆自杀行为单独入罪,不仅表明该行为的不法性,而且起到震慑犯罪分子以及预防犯罪的作用。因此,本文在对教唆自杀行为的概念、立法实践进行界定与剖析的基础上,对该行为的可罚性进行合理论证,以期对立法及司法实践提供参考价值。
Abstract:
The frequent occurrence of hot events of instigation suicide makes the social harmfulness of this behavior gradually surface. There is no clear stipulation in the existing legislation of our country to effectively curb it, and there is a great controversy about whether this behavior is punishable. It is found that the vast majority of countries and regions criminalize the act of soliciting suicide separately, which not only shows the lawlessness of the act, but also plays a role in deterring criminals and preventing crimes. Therefore, on the basis of the definition and analysis of the concept and legislative practice of instigation suicide, this paper makes a reasonable demonstration of the punishment of this behavior, in order to provide reference value for legislation and judicial practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张永红, 吴茵. 教唆自杀新论[J]. 法学杂志, 2011(1): 18-21.
|
|
[2]
|
何彩萍. 教唆、帮助他人自杀行为独立定罪的法理探析[J]. 榆林学院学报, 2005, 15(2): 29-33.
|
|
[3]
|
陈兴良. 教唆或者帮助他人自杀行为之定性研究——邵建国案分析[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2004(6): 71-78.
|
|
[4]
|
[德]罗克辛. 德国刑法学总论(第一卷) [M]. 王世洲, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005: 247.
|
|
[5]
|
[德]乌尔弗瑞德∙诺伊曼. 国家刑罚的法哲学问题[M]. 冯军, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 36.
|
|
[6]
|
张明楷. 新刑法与法益侵害说[J]. 法学研究, 2000(1): 19-32.
|
|
[7]
|
黎宏. 日本刑法精义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008: 347.
|