高频交易监管的法律问题
Legal Issues Related to High-Frequency Trading Regulation
摘要: 高频交易的起源与发展依附于近代外国资本崛起的时代,高频交易在我国的应用起步较晚。近些年,中国经济腾飞,证券市场活跃,但中国金融市场相对稚嫩,高频交易也频繁出现在人们视野范围之内,伴随的监管问题随之而来。目前,高频交易实质概念及特征存在较大模糊,其市场监管的法律依据缺失,监管机制匮乏,导致高频交易问题频发。通过完善监管法律规则,明确监管的不正当策略,制定公平同位托管服务标准,从而实现对高频交易的全方位监管。
Abstract:
The origin and development of high-frequency trading are dependent on the rise of foreign capital in modern times, and the application of high-frequency trading in China started relatively late. In recent years, China’s economy has taken off and the securities market has been active. However, China’s financial market is relatively immature, and high-frequency trading has also frequently appeared in people’s sight, accompanied by regulatory issues. At present, there is a significant ambi-guity in the substantive concept and characteristics of high-frequency trading, with a lack of legal basis for market regulation and a lack of regulatory mechanisms, leading to frequent issues with high-frequency trading. By improving regulatory legal rules, clarifying inappropriate regulatory strategies, and establishing fair co location custody service standards, we can achieve comprehensive supervision of high-frequency transactions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
鲁胜. 论高频交易操纵市场鉴识及其法律规制[J]. 社会科学动态, 2017(9): 68-76.
|
|
[2]
|
吴晓灵. 中国金融资源配置效率的提高路径分析[J]. 中国市场, 2015(31): 3-6.
|
|
[3]
|
肖凯. 从柯西亚案看幌骗型高频交易的司法认定[J]. 检察风云, 2017(4): 28-29.
|
|
[4]
|
李文红, 蒋则沈. 金融科技(FinTech)发展与监管: 一个监管者的视角[J]. 金融监管研究, 2017(3): 1-13.
|
|
[5]
|
姜哲. 程序化交易的潜在风险和监管体系研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2017(6): 78-94.
|
|
[6]
|
张培培. “公平主义”视角下高频交易监管的法律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2015.
|
|
[7]
|
曹磊, 陈超. 高技术环境下金融信息利用的特点、价值和风险一高频交易启示录[J]. 竞争情报, 2017, 13(1): 11-15.
|
|
[8]
|
邢会强. 证券期货市场高频交易的法律监管框架研究[J]. 中国法学, 2016(5): 156-177.
|
|
[9]
|
鲍晓晔. 幌骗的“罪”与“罚”一美国行政监管与司法实践的借鉴[J]. 证券市场导报, 2017(10): 71-78.
|
|
[10]
|
靳波. A股市场次高频交易可行性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2016.
|
|
[11]
|
熊理思. 美国证券市场高频交易的最新法律监管动向——兼论“光大8∙16事件”的防范[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2014, 16(1): 25-30.
|