认罪认罚从宽制度的反思与重塑
Reflection and Development of Leniency System of Guilty Plea in Practice
摘要: 案件数量的庞大与司法资源的相对有限,是司法实践中长期面临的现实问题。司法不断改革,试图达到在合理限度内实现司法资源的有效利用,即在司法公正的基础上,实现司法资源的最大化。在两高三部指导下,颁布了《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》中,可见刑事司法改革的决心。中央政法委工作会议曾明确提到“要在借鉴辩诉交易等制度的合理元素的基础上,抓紧研究提出完善认罪认罚从宽制度的试点方案”。而该制度经过几年的发展,其实践问题也日益突出,如今解决中国实践问题、有效借鉴外国相似制度便是当今之计。本文以本国认罪认罚从宽制度为核心展开论述,重点探讨该制度所存在的实践问题并结合域外相似制度进行分析、借鉴,以更好重塑本土制度。
Abstract: The large number of cases and the relatively limited judicial resources are long-term practical problems faced by judicial practice. Judicial reform continues, trying to achieve the effective use of judicial resources within a reasonable limit, that is, on the basis of judicial justice, to achieve the maximum of judicial resources. The determination of criminal justice reform can be seen in the guiding Opinions on the Application of leniency system of Guilty plea issued under the guidance of the two and three ministries. At the working meeting of the Central Political and Legal Commission, it was clearly mentioned that “we should study and put forward a pilot scheme to improve the leni-ency system of guilty plea on the basis of learning from reasonable elements of the system such as plea bargaining.” After several years of development, the practical problems of this system have become increasingly prominent. Now it is the best way to solve China’s practical problems and learn from similar foreign systems effectively. This paper focuses on the domestic leniency system of guilty plea, focuses on the practical problems of the system, and analyzes and draws lessons from similar systems outside the country, so as to better reshape the local system.
文章引用:王涵颖. 认罪认罚从宽制度的反思与重塑[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(1): 408-415. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2024.121059

参考文献

[1] 熊秋红. 比较法视野下的认罪认罚从宽制度——兼论刑事诉讼“第四范式” [J]. 比较法研究, 2019(5): 80-101.
[2] 潘豫皖. 认罪认罚从宽制度下被告人上诉的应对路径[M]//施伟东. 《上海法学研究》集刊(2020年第19卷总第43卷)——东南大学文集. 2020.
[3] 王敏远, 杨帆. 认罪认罚从宽制度的新发展——《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》解析[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020, 28(3): 55-73.
[4] 廖清顺. 浅谈认罪认罚从宽制度的四个维度——认罪认罚从宽制度问题反思[J]. 法律适用, 2020(5): 101-111.
[5] 蔡鹏程. 认罪认罚从宽制度中刑事辩护的困境与出路[J]. 实事求是, 2021(2): 72-78.
[6] 韩红. 认罪认罚从宽制度的内涵与边界——兼与刑事速裁程序比较[J]. 学术交流, 2017(8): 117-123.
[7] 刘晨琦. 认罪认罚从宽制度 在国家治理体系中的定位[EB/OL]. 中国社会科学网. https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202208/t20220803_5463807.shtml, 2023-10-07.
[8] 丛程. 认罪认罚从宽制度审前防控机制的构建——以程序建议权为视角[J]. 法制博览, 2018(18): 89-90.
[9] 周维明. 德国刑事协商制度的最新发展与启示[J]. 法律适用, 2018(13): 101-112.
[10] 牟治伟. 美国与德国认罪协商制度之比较[N]. 人民法院报, 2021-10-15(008).
[11] 马勇. 对认罪认罚从宽制度适用的思考[J]. 法制与经济, 2017(9): 178-179+183.
[12] 王又丹. 认罪认罚案件量刑建议应把握四个原则[J]. 人民检察, 2020(6): 79.
[13] 张可. 辩诉交易之本土适用: 一场未完成的变革[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 57(3): 71-78.
[14] 许健. 检察提前介入职务犯罪调查中认罪认罚的一体化探讨[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2021, 28(3): 73-87.
[15] 郭烁. 认罪认罚背景下屈从型自愿的防范——以确立供述失权规则为例[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(6): 127-138.