33例超声引导ERAT治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎临床分析
Clinical Analysis of 33 Cases of Ultrasound-Guided Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在探讨超声引导内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:选取2022年09月至2023年05月大理大学第二附属医院接受超声引导内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术的33例急性非复杂性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,分析患者临床特点、手术疗效及预后情况。结果:纳入研究的33例患者中,男性18例(54.5%),女性15例(45.5%),年龄为46 (30, 61)岁;术前阑尾直径为1.03 ± 0.34 cm;33例患者均插管成功,插管成功率为100% (33/33),手术时长为45 (30, 62) min、术中出血量为(0.42 ± 1.03) ml;术后腹痛完全缓解时间为2 (1, 3) d,压痛完全缓解时间3 (1, 3) d,反跳痛完全缓解时间1.5 (1, 3) d,麦氏点压痛缓解时间3 (2, 3.75) d。术后3天复查阑尾直径为0.85 ± 0.28 cm。所有患者术后均未出现并发症;共随访33例,随访中阑尾炎复发率为3.0% (1/33)。结论:超声引导内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的一种安全有效的方法。
Abstract: Objective: The objective of this research was to examine the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound- guided endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy in managing cases of acute uncomplicated ap-pendicitis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 33 patients of acute uncomplicated appendicitis who underwent ultrasound-guided endoscopic retrograde ap-pendicitis therapy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dali University from September 2022 to May 2023. The patients’ clinical characteristics, surgical efficacy, and prognosis were analyzed. Results: Among the 33 patients included in the study, there were 18 males (54.5%) and 15 females (45.5%), with a median age of 46 (30, 61) years. The preoperative appendix diameter was 1.03 ± 0.34 cm. All patients were successfully intubated in appendiceal lumen with an intubation success rate of 100% (33/33). Operative duration was 45 (30, 62) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (0.42 ± 1.03) ml. The postoperative complete relief time of abdominal pain was 2 (1, 3) days, tenderness com-plete relief time was 3 (1, 3) days, rebound tenderness complete relief time was 1.5 (1, 3) days, and McBurney’s point tenderness relief time was 3 (2, 3.75) days. Three days after the surgery, the ap-pendix diameter was 0.85 ± 0.28 cm. There was no complications occurred. A total of 33 patients were followed up, and the recurrence rate of appendicitis during the follow-up was 3.0% (1/33). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy is a safe and effective method for treating acute uncomplicated appendicitis. It has the advantages of minimal invasive-ness, quick recovery, and fewer complications.
文章引用:李泗云, 刘中建, 刘界宇, 黄继华, 吉玉屏, 张帆. 33例超声引导ERAT治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎临床分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(1): 1216-1223. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.141176

参考文献

[1] Liu, B.R., Song, J.T., Han, F.Y., et al. (2012) Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy: A Pilot Minimally Invasive Technique (with Videos). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 76, 862-866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 李庆群. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的临床价值评价[J]. 中国实用医药, 2022(15): 21-24.
[3] Yang, B., Kong, L., Ullah, S., et al. (2022) Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy versus Laparo-scopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis. Endoscopy, 54, 747-754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 刘冰熔. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗技术介绍[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2012, 1(2): 37.
[5] Salminen, P., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., et al. (2015) Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 313, 2340-2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 纪孝国. 腹腔镜下阑尾切除手术与开放手术治疗急性阑尾炎患者的价值分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2023(1): 104-106.
[7] Minutolo, V., Licciardello, A., Di Stefano, B., et al. (2014) Outcomes and Cost Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: 4-Years Experience in a District Hospital. BMC Surgery, 14, Article No. 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Girard-Madoux, M.J.H., Gomez de Agüero, M., Ganal-Vonarburg, S.C., et al. (2018) The Immunological Functions of the Appendix: An Example of Redundancy? Seminars in Immunolo-gy, 36, 31-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kooij, I.A., Sahami, S., Meijer, S.L., et al. (2016) The Immunol-ogy of the Vermiform Appendix: A Review of the Literature. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 186, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Viennet, M., Tapia, S., Cottenet, J., et al. (2023) Increased Risk of Colon Cancer after Acute Appendicitis: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study. eClinicalMedicine, 63, Article 102196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Sahami, S., Kooij, I.A., Meijer, S.L., et al. (2016) The Link be-tween the Appendix and Ulcerative Colitis: Clinical Relevance and Potential Immunological Mechanisms. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 111, 163-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Nakahara, K., Nakane, S., Ishii, K., et al. (2023) Gut Microbiota of Par-kinson’s Disease in an Appendectomy Cohort: A Preliminary Study. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Im, G.Y., Modayil, R.J., Lin, C.T., et al. (2011) The Appendix May Protect against Clostridium difficile Recurrence. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 9, 1072-1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Dinc, B., Oskay, A., Dinc, S.E., et al. (2015) New Parameter in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Platelet Distribution Width. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 21, 1821-1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Dhindsa, B., Naga, Y., Praus, A., et al. (2022) Endoscopic Retro-grade Appendicitis Therapy for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endoscopy International Open, 10, E1014-E1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 严晓南, 王东, 李兆申. 新经自然腔道内镜手术技术培训及操作平台的发展现状[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017, 34(11): 827-830.
[17] 王子恺, 杨云生, 李闻, 孙刚, 彭丽华, 王向东. 急性阑尾炎消化内镜治疗现状及展望[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2021, 38(12): 976-979.
[18] Chen, Y.T., Wang, X., Zhao, L.L., et al. (2019) Endoscopic Intervention for Acute Appendicitis—Retrospective Study of 101 Cases. Gastroin-testinal Endoscopy, 89, AB511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 吴以龙, 江志俊, 林卫星, 等. 内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术的临床应用[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2019(5): 517-519.
[20] 石明亮, 王晓磊, 李江琳, 等. 内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术在治疗急性阑尾炎中的应用效果比较[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2022, 38(5): 819-822.
[21] 黄志良, 霍中华, 束一鸣. 内镜下逆行阑尾治疗术在急性阑尾炎治疗中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020(11): 1028-1031.
[22] 刘冰熔, 王宏光, 孙相钊, 等. 内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术应用多中心回顾性分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016, 33(8): 514-518.
[23] 周玮红, 余飞跃, 伍小琼, 等. 内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎35例报告[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2021, 18(3): 113-116.
[24] 冯佳, 冯子坛, 孙蓉, 等. 超声监视肠镜下阑尾腔内冲洗术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2015, 2(2): 17-20.
[25] 黎新. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术疗效及安全性评估[J]. 临床普外科电子杂志, 2021, 9(1): 31-34+42.
[26] 李冉. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的疗效观察及安全性评估[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2020, 33(19): 3222-3223.
[27] 黄国政. 内镜下逆行阑尾炎治疗术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的疗效分析[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2019, 32(2): 227-228.
[28] Liu, B.R., Kong, L.J., Ullah, S., et al. (2022) Endoscopic Retro-grade Appendicitis Therapy (ERAT) vs Appendectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Prospective Multicen-ter Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 23, 636-641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]