论我国行政法法典化的模式选择
On the Mode Choice of the Codification of Administrative Law in China
摘要: 《中华人民共和国民法典》的颁布,掀起了学界对行政法典化的讨论热潮,为行政法法典的发展打开了学习的大门。通过对域外行政法法典化的观察来看,行政法典的法典化模式主要有三种。我国行政法法典化的路径选择主要分为“行政法全部法典化”、“行政程序法典化”与“行政法总则法典化”。在对三种法典化模式进行思考对比后,可以得出行政法总则法典化的模式是我国行政法法典化路径的最优选择。行政法总则法典化既具有体系化功能与可行性,且能够满足法典化下维护法的稳定性与保持法律体系动态性的需求。
Abstract:
The promulgation of the “Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China” has set off an upsurge of discussion on the codification of administrative law in academic circles, which has opened the door of learning for the development of administrative law code. Through the observation of the codification of administrative law outside the territory, there are three modes of codification of administrative code. The path selection of the codification of administrative law in China is mainly divided into “codification of all administrative laws”, “codification of administrative procedures” and “codification of general rules of administrative law”. After considering and comparing the three codification modes, it can be concluded that the codification mode of the general provisions of administrative law is the best choice for the codification path of our country’s administrative law. Codification of the general provisions of administrative law not only has the function and feasibility of systematization, but also can meet the needs of maintaining the stability of law and maintaining the dynamic nature of legal system under codification.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马怀德. 中国行政法典的时代需求与制度供给[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(4): 845-864.
|
|
[2]
|
王世涛. 行政法的法典化: 法学教义与规范模式[J]. 行政法学研究, 2022(5): 43-56.
|
|
[3]
|
严益州. 德国《联邦行政程序法》的源起、论争与形成[J]. 环球法律评论, 2018, 40(6): 153-173.
|
|
[4]
|
关保英. 行政法典总则的法理学分析[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(1): 42-56.
|
|
[5]
|
应松年. 中国行政程序法立法展望[J]. 中国法学, 2010(2): 5-26.
|
|
[6]
|
关保英. 行政法典总则制定的正当性研究[J]. 法治社会, 2022(1): 1-20.
|
|
[7]
|
杨登峰. 从《民法典》的编纂看行政法典的编纂——对“单行法先行”模式的一种考察与展望[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021(3): 3-13.
|