基于AMESim的不同充电方式下磷酸铁锂电池老化仿真分析
Simulation Analysis of Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Aging under Different Charging Modes Based on AMESim
摘要: 随着全球碳减排行动深入,交通领域电气化驱动新能源汽车数量高增,动力电池作为新能源汽车的主要动力来源,其老化过程直接影响汽车的高续航里程与使用年限。通过AMESim仿真建模软件,建立了针对动力电池老化问题的充电策略评估模型,对比在四种不同充电策略下电池的老化程度。仿真结果显示,在“早晨上班前充电”策略下电池老化仿真结果最佳,容量损失为3.59%;而在“有空就充”策略下,电池老化仿真结果最差,产生了7.54%的容量损失。
Abstract:
As the global carbon emission reduction action is deepening, the electrification of the transport sector drives the high increase in the number of new energy vehicles, the aging process of the power battery, as the main power source of new energy vehicles, directly affects the high range and service life of the vehicle. Through AMESim simulation modeling software, a charging strategy evaluation model for the power battery aging problem was established to compare the aging degree of the battery under five different charging strategies. The simulation results show that the “charge in the morning before going to work” strategy has the best battery aging simulation results, with a capac-ity loss of 3.58%, while the “charge when free” strategy has the worst battery aging simulation re-sults, with a capacity loss of 7.54%.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
田晟, 吕清. 基于电化学机理的动力电池老化模型研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2020(4): 22-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
吴赟, 蒋新华, 解晶莹. 锂离子电池循环寿命快速衰减的原因[J]. 电池, 2009, 39(4): 206-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
朱晓鹏. 车用磷酸铁锂动力电池状态估计研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 山西: 太原理工大学, 2021.
|
|
[4]
|
Gao, Y., Jiang, J., Zhang, C., et al. (2017) Lithium-Ion Battery Aging Mecha-nisms and Life Model under Different Charging Stresses. Journal of Power Sources, 356, 103-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
汪红辉, 刘一凡, 储德韧. 不同荷电状态钛酸锂电池高温日历老化研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(8): 2606-2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
刘汉雨. 锂离子电池充电方法及寿命预测研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2015.
|
|
[7]
|
刘卓然, 吕培召, 霍宇涛, 等. 三元富镍锂离子电池不同充放电策略下的老化特性研究[J]. 能源研究与利用, 2021(5): 22-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|