全髋关节置换术假体稳定性的研究进展
Research Progress on the Stability of Prostheses in Total Hip Arthroplasty
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.141254, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 刘贵昂:暨南大学第二临床医学院,广东 深圳;岱文锋:深圳市福永人民医院骨科,广东 深圳;余洋溢, 李广恒*:深圳市人民医院(暨南大学第二临床医学院,南方科技大学第一附属医院)骨关节外科,广东 深圳
关键词: 髋关节置换脱位假体稳定性Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Prosthetic Stability
摘要: 随着人口老龄化的加剧和对高品质生活的渴望,对全髋关节置换术(THA)的需求逐年增加。脱位仍然是THA术后的常见并发症。尽管利用3D建模或导航系统能帮助医生较为准确的评估假体安放位置,但是术中稳定性检查仍是最可靠的评估手段。目前临床医师对于假体稳定性检查方法的认知还有一定不足,本文章结合文献报道内容,对THA假体稳定性的研究现状进行分析,主要目的在于为手术医生提供参考,现作如下综述。
Abstract: With the intensification of aging population and the desire for high-quality life, the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing year by year. Dislocation continues to be a common complica-tion following THA. Although the use of 3D modeling or navigation systems can assist doctors in more accurately assessing the placement of prosthetics, intraoperative stability test remains the most reliable means of evaluation. Currently, there is still some lack of awareness among clinical physicians regarding methods for assessing prosthetic stability intraoperatively. This article, in conjunction with the reported literature, analyzes the current research status of prosthetic stability in THA. The primary objective is to provide insights and recommendations based on the existing knowledge for orthopedic surgeons, and the following review is hereby made.
文章引用:刘贵昂, 岱文锋, 余洋溢, 李广恒. 全髋关节置换术假体稳定性的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(1): 1789-1795. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.141254

参考文献

[1] Heckmann, N.D., Sivasundaram, L., Stefl, M.D., et al. (2018) Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Trends in the United States from 2007 to 2014: The Rise of Ceramic on Polyethylene. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33, 1757-1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ferguson, R.J., Palmer, A.J., Taylor, A., et al. (2018) Hip Re-placement. The Lancet, 392, 1662-1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Soliman, M.M., Islam, M.T., Chowdhury, M.E.H., et al. (2023) Advancement in Total Hip Implant: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanics and Performance Parameters across Diverse Novelties. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 11, 10507-10537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Parvizi, J., Picinic, E. and Sharkey, P.F. (2008) Revision Total Hip Ar-throplasty for Instability: Surgical Techniques and Principles. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 90, 1134-1142.
[5] Bozic, K.J., Kurtz, S.M., Lau, E., et al. (2009) The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthro-plasty in the United States. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 91, 128-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ganz, R., Parvizi, J., Beck, M., et al. (2003) Femoroacetabular Im-pingement: A Cause for Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 417, 112-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Tanino, H., Ito, H., Harman, M.K., et al. (2008) An in Vivo Model for Intraoperative Assessment of Impingement and Dislocation in Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 23, 714-720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Malik, A., Maheshwari, A. and Dorr, L.D. (2007) Impingement with Total Hip Replacement: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 89, 1832-1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chandler, D.R., Glousman, R., Hull, D., et al. (1982) Prosthetic Hip Range of Motion and Impingement. The Effects of Head and Neck Geometry. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Re-search, 166, 284-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Lewinnek, G.E., Lewis, J.L., Tarr, R., et al. (1978) Dis-locations after Total Hip-Replacement Arthroplasties. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 60, 217-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Callanan, M.C., Jarrett, B., Bragdon, C.R., et al. (2011) The John Charnley Award: Risk Factors for Cup Malpositioning: Quality Improvement through a Joint Registry at a Ter-tiary Hospital. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 469, 319-329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Reina, N., Putman, S., Desmarchelier, R., et al. (2017) Can a Tar-get Zone Safer than Lewinnek’s Safe Zone Be Defined to Prevent Instability of Total Hip Arthroplasties? Case-Control Study of 56 Dislocated THA and 93 Matched Controls. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 103, 657-661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Seagrave, K.G., Troelsen, A., Malchau, H., et al. (2017) Acetabular Cup Position and Risk of Dislocation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica, 88, 10-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] DelSole, E.M., Vigdorchik, J.M., Schwarzkopf, R., et al. (2017) Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Spinal Deformity Population: Does Degree of Sagittal Deformity Affect Rates of Safe Zone Placement, Instability, or Revision? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 1910-1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Perfetti, D.C., Schwarzkopf, R., Buckland, A.J., et al. (2017) Pros-thetic Dislocation and Revision after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 1635-1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gausden, E.B., Parhar, H.S., Popper, J.E., et al. (2018) Risk Fac-tors for Early Dislocation Following Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33, 1567-1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Phan, D., Bederman, S.S. and Schwarzkopf, R. (2015) The Influence of Sagittal Spinal Deformity on Anteversion of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B, 1017-1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Scifert, C.F., Brown, T.D., Pedersen, D.R., et al. (1998) A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 355, 152-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Domb, B.G., El, Bitar, Y.F., Sadik, A.Y., et al. (2014) Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Placement in THA: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 472, 329-336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Migliorini, F., Cuozzo, F., Oliva, F., et al. (2023) CT-Based Navigation for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Medical Research, 28, Article No. 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Jang, S.J., Jones, C., Shanaghan, K., et al. (2023) The Impact of Varying Femoral Head Length on Hip External Rotation during Posterior-Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today, 19, Article ID: 101072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Ando, W., Takao, M., Hamada, H., et al. (2021) Comparison of the Accuracy of the Cup Position and Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip between the Mako Robotic Arm-Assisted System and Computed Tomography-Based Navigation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 45, 1719-1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Bunn, A., Colwell, C.W. and D’lima, D.D. (2014) Effect of Head Diameter on Passive and Active Dynamic Hip Dislocation: Passive and Active Hip Dislocation. Journal of Ortho-paedic Research, 32, 1525-1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Robinson, R.P., Simonian, P.T., Gradisar, I.M., et al. (1997) Joint Motion and Surface Contact Area Related to Component Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Sur-gery. British Volume, 79, 140-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Bourne, R.B. and Rorabeck, C.H. (2002) Soft Tissue Bal-ancing: The Hip. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 17, 17-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Nadzadi, M.E., Pedersen, D.R., Yack, H.J., et al. (2003) Kinematics, Kinetics, and Finite Element Analysis of Commonplace Maneuvers at Risk for Total Hip Dislocation. Journal of Biome-chanics, 36, 577-591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Woolson, S.T. and Rahimtoola, Z.O. (1999) Risk Factors for Dislocation during the First 3 Months after Primary Total Hip Replacement. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 14, 662-668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Harris, W.H. (1980) Advances in Surgical Technique for Total Hip Replacement: Without and with Osteotomy of the Greater Trochanter. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Re-search, 146, 188-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Yoshimine, F. (2005) The Influence of the Oscillation Angle and the Neck Anteversion of the Prosthesis on the Cup Safe-Zone That Fulfills the Criteria for Range of Motion in Total Hip Replacements. The Required Oscillation Angle for an Acceptable Cup Safe-Zone. Journal of Biomechanics, 38, 125-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Sierra, R.J., Raposo, J.M., Trousdale, R.T., et al. (2005) Dis-location of Primary THA Done through a Posterolateral Approach in the Elderly: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Re-search, 441, 262-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ponzio, D.Y., Poultsides, L.A., Salvatore, A., et al. (2018) In-Hospital Morbidity and Postoperative Revisions after Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33, 1421-1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Miller, L.E., Gondusky, J.S., Kamath, A.F., et al. (2018) Influence of Surgical Approach on Complication Risk in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica, 89, 289-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Horne, P.H. and Olson, S.A. (2011) Direct Anterior Ap-proach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Fracture Table. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 4, 139-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Connolly, K.P. and Kamath, A.F. (2016) Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Literature Review of Variations in Surgical Technique. World Journal of Orthopedics, 7, 38-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Fritz, J.K., Waddell, B.S., Kitziger, K.J., et al. (2021) Is Dislocation Risk Due to Posterior Pelvic Tilt Reduced with Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty? The Journal of Arthroplas-ty, 36, 3692-3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Charles, M.N., Bourne, R.B., Davey, J.R., et al. (2004) Soft-Tissue Balancing of the Hip: The Role of Femoral Offset Restoration. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 86, 1078-1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef