PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对接受手术、放疗或化疗后晚期食管癌患者的疗效和安全性的Meta分析
Meta Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer after Surgery, Radiotherapy, or Chemotherapy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.141267, PDF,   
作者: 张伊莎:山东省荣军总医院消化内科,山东 济南;李晓雅, 单晓宇*:山东省康复医院内科,山东 济南
关键词: 食管癌PD-1PD-L1随机对照试验(RCT)Meta分析Esophageal Cancer PD-1 PD-L1 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Meta-Analysis
摘要: 目的:系统评价PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对接受手术、放疗或化疗后食管癌患者的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机对PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、Clinical Trials等多个数据库进行了搜索与筛选工作,以寻找关于手术、放疗或化疗后晚期食管癌患者免疫治疗的相关研究(2018年1月~2022年12月),应用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。纳入标准为临床II期或III期的双盲随机对照试验(Randomized controlled trials, RCTs)。结果:共纳入9项研究,共5558例晚期食管癌患者。通过数据分析研究发现,免疫抑制剂组和对照组12个月的总体生存率(overall survival, OS) (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00~1.73, P ≤ 0.05;异质性:I2 = 76%,P < 0.01)、无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS) (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15~2.28, P < 0.01;异质性:I2 = 76%,P < 0.01)、客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR) (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.69~2.32, P < 0.01;异质性:I2 = 18%,P = 0.28)和毒副反应发生率(OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24~0.54, P < 0.01;异质性:I2 = 91%,P < 0.01)具有统计学意义。结论:应用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对接受手术、放化疗的晚期食管癌患者能有效提高食管癌患者的总体生存水平,且安全性高。
Abstract: Object: Systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with esophageal cancer after surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Method: The computer searched and screened multiple databases such as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, etc. to search for relevant research on immunotherapy for advanced esophageal can-cer patients after surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy (January 2018 to December 2022), ap-plying RevMan5.3 software for meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were double blind randomized controlled trials for clinical phase II or III (Randomized controlled trials, RCTs). Results: A total of 9 studies were included, with a total of 5558 patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Through data analysis, it was found that the overall survival rates of the immunosuppressive group and the con-trol group at 12 months (overall survival, OS) (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00~1.73, P ≤ 0.05; heterogene-ity: I2 = 76%, P < 0.01), progression-free survival (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15~2.28, P < 0.01; hetero-geneity: I2 = 76%, P < 0.01), objective response rate (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.69~2.32, P < 0.01; het-erogeneity: I2 = 18%, P = 0.28) and the incidence of toxic side effects (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24~0.54, P < 0.01; heterogeneity: I2 = 91%, P < 0.01) have statistically significant. Conclusion: The applica-tion of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can effectively improve the overall survival level of advanced esopha-geal cancer patients undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, with high safety.
文章引用:张伊莎, 李晓雅, 单晓宇. PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对接受手术、放疗或化疗后晚期食管癌患者的疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(1): 1888-1897. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.141267

参考文献

[1] Cai, Z. and Liu, Q. (2021) Understanding the Global Cancer Statistics 2018: Implications for Cancer Control. Science China Life Sciences, 64, 1017-1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Hoefnagel, S., Boonstra, J.J., Russchen, M., et al. (2021) Towards Personalized Treatment Strategies for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; A Review on the Molecular Characterization of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Current Research Efforts on Individualized Curative Treatment Regimens. Cancers, 13, Article 4881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Li, Q., Liu, T. and Ding, Z. (2022) Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Review. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, Article 1051841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Han, D., Li, B., Zhao, Q., et al. (2022) The Key Clinical Ques-tions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer-A Review. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Arti-cle ID: 890688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Yan, Y., Feng, X., Li, C., et al. (2022) Treatments for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: From Traditional Systemic Therapy to Immunotherapy. Chinese Medical Journal, 135, 2143-2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Wang, Z., Shao, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Surgically Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 104, Article ID: 106767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Fang, P., Zhou, J., Liang, Z., et al. (2022) Immunotherapy Re-sistance in Esophageal Cancer: Possible Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, Article 975986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Waters, J.K. and Reznik, S.I. (2022) Update on Man-agement of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer. Current Oncology Reports, 24, 375-385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Olivo, S.A., Macedo, L.G., Gadotti, I.C., et al. (2008) Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review. Physical Therapy, 88, 156-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Sun, J.M., Shen, L., Shah, M.A., et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Oesophageal Cancer (KEYNOTE-590): A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study. Lancet, 398, 759-771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Kato, K., Cho, B.C., Takahashi, M., et al. (2019) Nivolumab versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Pre-vious Chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 20, 1506-1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kojima, T., Shah, M.A., Muro, K., et al. (2020) Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38, 4138-4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wang, Z.X., Cui, C., Yao, J., et al. (2022) Toripalimab plus Chemo-therapy in Treatment-Naive, Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (JUPITER-06): A Multi-Center Phase 3 Trial. Cancer Cell, 40, 277-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Huang, J., Xu, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2020) Camrelizumab versus In-vestigator’s Choice of Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCORT): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study. The Lancet Oncology, 21, 832-842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Luo, H., Lu, J., Bai, Y., et al. (2021) Effect of Camrelizumab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 326, 916-925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Xu, J., Li, Y., Fan, Q., et al. (2022) Clinical and Biomarker Analyses of Sintilimab versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Car-cinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase 2 Study (ORIENT-2). Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Janjigian, Y.Y., Shitara, K., Moehler, M., et al. (2021) First-Line Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Gastric, Gastro-Oesophageal Junction, and Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet, 398, 27-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Doki, Y., Ajani, J.A., Kato, K., et al. (2022) Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, 386, 449-462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Cao, W., Chen, H.D., Yu, Y.W., et al. (2020) Changing Profiles of Cancer Burden Worldwide and in China: A Secondary Analysis of the Global Cancer Statistics. Chinese Medical Journal, 134, 783-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Attia, H. and Smyth, E. (2021) Evolving Therapies in Ad-vanced Oesophago-Gastric Cancers and the Increasing Role of Immunotherapy. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 21, 535-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Freeman, G.J., Long, A.J., Iwai, Y., et al. (2000) Engage-ment of the PD-1 Immunoinhibitory Receptor by A Novel B7 Family Member Leads to Negative Regulation of Lym-phocyte Activation. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 192, 1027-1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Cao, S., Li, J., Lu, J., et al. (2019) Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Anti-gens Repress Th1 Immune Response Suppression and Promotes Lung Cancer Metastasis through PD-1/PDl-1 Signaling Pathway. Cell Death & Disease, 10, Article No. 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Suzuki, K., Tajima, M., Tokumaru, Y., et al. (2023) Anti-PD-1 Antibodies Recognizing the Membrane-Proximal Region Are PD-1 Agonists That Can Down-Regulate Inflammatory Diseases. Science Immunology, 8, eadd4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Tan, Z., Chiu, M.S., Yang, X., et al. (2023) Isoformic PD-1-Mediated Immunosuppression Underlies Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients. Gut, 72, 1568-1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rousseau, B., Bieche, I., Pasmant, E., et al. (2022) PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon. Cancer Discovery, 12, 1435-1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Kanie, K., Iguchi, G., Bando, H., et al. (2021) Mechanistic Insights into Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Hypophysitis: A Form of Paraneoplastic Syndrome. Cancer Immu-nology, Immunotherapy, 70, 3669-3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Makker, V., Colombo, N., Casado, H.A., et al. (2023) Len-vatinib plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Updated Efficacy and Safety from the Randomized Phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41, 2904-2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Wang, B.C., Zhang, Z.J., Fu, C., et al. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Agents vs Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine, 98, e18054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Yang, L., Dong, X.Z., Xing, X.X., et al. (2020) Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1/Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Therapy in Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 12, 1346-1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]