TACE联合靶向治疗药物治疗中晚期肝癌的临床疗效的Meta分析
Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Targeted Therapy in the Treatment of Middle and Advanced Liver Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.141307, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 向 康, 戴鑫杰, 李 丹, 吴登鼎, 杨新宇, 艾 空, 胡 军*:三峡大学第一临床医学院,宜昌市中心人民医院,湖北 宜昌
关键词: 中晚期肝癌经动脉化疗栓塞索拉菲尼不良反应Middle and Advanced Liver Cancer TACE Sorafenib Adverse Reaction
摘要: 分析经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合靶向治疗药物索拉菲尼(Sorafenib)和单独TACE治疗中晚期肝癌的临床疗效及不良反应。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、考克兰图书馆、中国期刊全文数据库及万方数据库,收集TACE和索拉菲尼联合治疗中晚期肝癌相关的随机对照试验(Randomized Controlled Trial, RCT),检索时间跨度均从建库至2023年8月。由2位评价者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,按照Cochrane系统评价方法完成数据提取和文献质量评估。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:在检索分析后有7篇RCT入组,共920例患者,其中观察组为TACE联合sorafenib治疗组有464例,TACE单独治疗组为对照组有456例,这些患者的客观缓解率(ORR)在TACE+索拉菲尼组和TACE组分别为55.8%和44.5%差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0008);而且TACE + 索拉菲尼组比单独TACE治疗组有更高的1年、2年生存率;TACE + 索拉菲尼的并发症中包括厌食症、贫血、脊髓抑制、腹泻腹痛、恶心呕吐、疲惫、发热、手足口症、高血压、体重减轻等,有些学者认为在TACE + 索拉菲尼的治疗方案中,索拉菲尼的使用加重了患者的不良反应,但和TACE单独治疗组相比,在TACE + 索拉菲尼治疗组中出现的更多不良反应如手足口症和腹泻,在对症治疗后患者可以明显改善,而胃肠道反应、发热、乏力等基础不良反应的病例数与对照组并无明显差异。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Sorafenib and TACE alone in the treatment of primary liver cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Journal Full-text Database and Wanfang Database were searched to collect the Randomized Controlled trials (RCTS) related to the combination of TACE and Sorafenib in the treatment of primary liver cancer. The retrieval time span is from database con-struction to August 2023. Two evaluators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Data extraction and literature quality assessment were completed according to the Cochrane systematic evaluation method. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Seven RCTS were included after retrieval analysis, including a total of 920 patients, includ-ing 464 patients in the observation group treated with TACE combined with Sorafenib, and 456 pa-tients in the control group treated with TACE alone. The objective response rate (ORR) of these pa-tients was 55.8% in the TACE + Sorafenib group and 44.5% in the TACE group (P = 0.0008). Moreo-ver, the TACE + Sorafenib group had higher 1-year and 2-year survival rates than the TACE group alone. Complications of TACE + Sorafenib include anorexia, anemia, spinal cord depression, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, fever, hand, foot and mouth disease, hypertension, weight loss, etc. Some scholars believe that in the treatment regimen of TACE + Sorafenib, the use of sorafenib worsens the adverse reactions of patients, and compared with conventional treatment alone group, in the TACE + Sorafenib treatment group, there were more adverse reactions such as hand, foot and mouth disease and diarrhea, which could be significantly improved after sympto-matic treatment, while there was no obvious difference in the number of cases of gastrointestinal reaction, fever, fatigue and other basic adverse reactions from the control group.
文章引用:向康, 戴鑫杰, 李丹, 吴登鼎, 杨新宇, 艾空, 胡军. TACE联合靶向治疗药物治疗中晚期肝癌的临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(1): 2181-2189. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.141307

参考文献

[1] Josep, M.L., Robin, K.K., et al. (2021) Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 7, Article No. 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Raoul, J.L., Alejandro, F., et al. (2019) Updated Use of TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: How and When to Use It Based on Clinical Evidence. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 72, 28-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 徐帅帅. 肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合阿帕替尼治疗中晚期肝细胞性肝癌的疗效及安全性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2022.[CrossRef
[4] 中国研究型医院学会互联网医院分会. 中国肿瘤微创治疗技术指南[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(18): 1838-1855.
[5] 张倩. 原发性肝癌微创介入治疗的临床对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 张家口: 河北北方学院, 2022.[CrossRef
[6] 植彪, 陈勇. TACE联合微波消融加索拉菲尼治疗中晚期原发性肝癌的临床疗效分析[J]. 四川医学, 2020, 41(10): 1058-1062.
[7] Lin, Z.H. and Jiang, J.R. (2021) Prognostic Value of Serum HIF-1α Change following Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 21, 109-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 王保江, 丛鹏. 经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合仑伐替尼治疗中晚期原发性肝癌的有效性与安全性: meta分析[J/OL].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 1-9. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1505.R.20231122.1710.018.html, 2023-12-11.
[9] 周仁贵, 周锡建, 李相勇, 等. 索拉非尼联合化疗栓塞治疗晚期原发性肝癌的疗效分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2014, 14(13): 2494-2496.
[10] 刘俊, 李灼日. 索拉菲尼联合TACE治疗肝癌术后复发的临床疗效分析[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2017, 46(12): 25-27.
[11] 谢佳杭, 王久惠. 索拉菲尼联合TACE治疗进展期原发性肝癌疗效及并发症分析[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2015, 28(3): 152-154.
[12] 潘静洁, 刘堂营. 肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合索拉菲尼及复方黄连素片治疗中晚期肝癌的临床观察[J]. 中医肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 1(3): 38-44.
[13] Kudo, M., Ueshima, K., Ikeda, M., et al. (2020) Randomised, Multicentre Prospective Trial of Transarterial Che-moembolisation (TACE) plus Sorafenib as Compared with TACE Alone in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: TACTICS Trial. Gut, 69, 1492-1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Tim, M., Richard, F., et al. (2017) Sorafenib in Combination with Transarterial Chemoembolisation in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TACE 2): A Randomised Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2, 565-575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wang, E.X., Xia, D.D., et al. (2019) Tumor Hypervascularity and Hand-Foot-Skin Reaction Predict Better Outcomes in Combination Treatment of TACE and Sorafenib for Intermediate Hepato-cellular Carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 19, Article No. 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 殷曰帅. TACE联合CT引导下经皮微波消融治疗肝细胞肝癌的临床研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2020.[CrossRef
[17] 姜香玉. 伽玛刀联合肝动脉栓塞化疗治疗原发性肝癌的疗效观察[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2023, 29(16): 75-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王盼. 经肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合仑伐替尼治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效及安全性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 泸州: 西南医科大学, 2023.[CrossRef
[19] 尹宏祥. 术前C反应蛋白联合纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值评分系统在肝细胞癌患者预后中的价值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 蚌埠医学院, 2023.[CrossRef
[20] 杨旭丽. 肝细胞癌并门静脉癌栓预后因素分析及寡糖链检测诊断价值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023.[CrossRef
[21] 中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会. 中国肿瘤整合诊治指南(CACA)-肝癌部分[J]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志, 2022, 8(3): 31-63.
[22] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版) [J]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志, 2022, 8(2): 16-53.
[23] 钱旋律. NLR等炎性标志物对HBV相关不可切除原发性肝癌患者TACE治疗效果的预测价值分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2022.[CrossRef
[24] 冀志祥. 西藏地区MDT下中晚期HCC患者HAIC与TACE的疗效与安全性对比[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 拉萨: 西藏大学, 2023.[CrossRef
[25] 咸晓梦. 体外模拟肿瘤微环境下索拉非尼和纳武单抗对肝癌的药效学研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2023.[CrossRef
[26] 李泰平. 介入联合靶向及免疫治疗对比单独介入治疗在不可切除肝癌中的疗效分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023.[CrossRef
[27] 陈大红, 李琴. 长链非编码RNA与肝细胞癌索拉非尼耐药: 分子机制与治疗靶点新进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2023, 31(24): 4633-4639.
[28] 陈新辉. 基于生物信息学分析构建铜死亡相关索拉非尼耐药基因的HCC预后评分模型[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2023.[CrossRef