不同尺寸双J管在输尿管软镜术后对净石率和双J管综合征的影响
The Effect of Different Size of Double J Tubes on Stone Free Rate and Double J Tube Syndrome after Flexible Ureteroscopy Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.142349, PDF,   
作者: 麦麦提图尔荪·库尔班:新疆医科大学研究生院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;阿不力孜·司马义*:新疆医科大学研究生院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 ;新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院泌尿中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 双J管输尿管镜输尿管软镜净石率Double J Tube Ureteroscopic Flexible Ureteroscopic Stone Free Rate
摘要: 双J管已经成为临床治疗泌尿系统疾病常用的置入性器械之一,其基本原理为建立人工通道,避开尿路的梗阻部位,缓解输尿管阻塞;同时,对于输尿管镜及输尿管软镜碎石术后患者,置入双J管可促进结石碎片的排出,提高净石率,从而起保护肾功能的作用。可在双J管的应用过程中,与支架留置相关的不良反应也为患者带来了不少的痛苦。因此可见,双J管的置入和支架相关症状之间的相关性是显而易见的。先前关于双J管的相关研究主要集中在支架设计、材料、位置和药物管理方面,但支架尺寸相关研究较少。目前,支架尺寸对双J管相关并发症和净石率的影响尚不清楚。有鉴于此,以比较不同尺寸的双J管引起的支架相关症状及对尿路结石的疗效作一综述。
Abstract: Double J tube has become one of the commonly used implantable instruments in clinical treatment of urinary diseases. Its basic principle is to establish artificial channels to avoid the obstruction of urinary tract and relieve ureteral obstruction. At the same time, for patients after ureteroscopic and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, the placement of double J tube can promote the excretion of stone fragments, improve the stone free rate, and thus protect renal function. But in the application of double J tube, the adverse reactions related to stent retention also brought a lot of pain to pa-tients. Therefore, the correlation between double J tube implantation and stent-related symptoms is obvious. Previous studies on double J tubes are mainly focused on stent design, material, location and drug management, but there are few studies on stent size. At present, the effect of stent size on double J tube related complications and stone free rate is not clear. In view of this, the stent-related symptoms caused by double J tubes of different sizes and the curative effect on urinary calculi were reviewed.
文章引用:麦麦提图尔荪·库尔班, 阿不力孜·司马义. 不同尺寸双J管在输尿管软镜术后对净石率和双J管综合征的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(2): 2490-2495. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.142349

参考文献

[1] 张琪, 陈杨, 卓栋. 输尿管支架的研究进展及临床应用前景[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2021, 41(4): 740-743.
[2] Cubuk, A., Yanaral, F., Ozgor, F., et al. (2018) Comparison of 4.8 Fr and 6 Fr Ureteral Stents on Stent Related Symptoms Following Ureterorenoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 34, 695-699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Wu, G., Sun, F., Sun, K., et al. (2021) Impact of Differential Ureteral Stent Diameters on Clinical Outcomes after Ureteroscopy Intracorporeal Lithotrip-sy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Urology, 28, 992-999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 祝昌明, 冯小迪, 陈长宜, 等. 输尿管留置双J管患者生活质量调查及输尿管支架症状评分表的应用[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2022, 42(2): 272-274.
[5] Reddy, S.J., Reddy, B.S., Chaw-la, A., et al. (2022) Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm. Journal of Clinical Medi-cine, 11, Article No. 7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Diatmika, A., Djojodimedjo, T., Kloping, Y.P., et al. (2022) Comparison of Ureteral Stent Diameters on Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Turkish Journal of Urology, 48, 30-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Joshi, H.B., Newns, N., Stainthorpe, A., et al. (2003) Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Quality of Life Measure. Journal of Urolo-gy, 169, 1060-1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ramachandra, M., Mosayyebi, A., Carugo, D., et al. (2020) Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ure-teric Stents. Research and Reports in Urology, 12, 303-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lopes, N.A. (2019) Forgotten Double-J Ureteral Stent. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 45, 1087-1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Taguchi, K. (2021) Editorial Comment to Impact of Dif-ferential Ureteral Stent Diameters on Clinical Outcomes after Ureteroscopy Intracorporeal Lithotripsy: A Systematic Re-view and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Urology, 28, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Ehsanullah, S.A., Bruce, A., Juman, C., et al. (2022) Stent Diameter and Stent-Related Symptoms, Does Size Matter? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology Annals, 14, 295-302.
[12] Taguchi, M., Yoshida, K., Sugi, M., et al. (2019) Effect of Ureteral Stent Diameter on Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, 11, 195-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Giannarini, G., Keeley, F.J., Valent, F., et al. (2011) Predictors of Morbid-ity in Patients with Indwelling Ureteric Stents: Results of a Prospective Study Using the Validated Ureteric Stent Symp-toms Questionnaire. BJU International, 107, 648-654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kim, B.S., Choi, J.Y. and Jung, W. (2020) Does a Ureteral Stent with a Smaller Diameter Reduce Stent-Related Bladder Irrita-tion? A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study. Journal of Endourology, 34, 368-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Vogt, B., Desfemmes, F.N., Desgrippes, A., et al. (2016) MiniJFil®: A New Safe and Effective Stent for Well-Tolerated Repeated Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy or Ureteroscopy for Medium-to-Large Kidney Stones? Nephro-Urology Monthly, 8, e40788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Nestler, S., Witte, B., Schilchegger, L., et al. (2020) Size Does Mat-ter: Ureteral Stents with a Smaller Diameter Show Advantages Regarding Urinary Symptoms, Pain Levels and General Health. World Journal of Urology, 38, 1059-1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kinn, A.C. and Lykkeskov-Andersen, H. (2002) Impact on Ure-teral Peristalsis in a Stented Ureter. An Experimental Study in the Pig. Urological Research, 30, 213-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Modai, J., Shilo, Y., Leibovici, D., et al. (2022) Drainage of In-fected Kidneys with Ureteral Stents: Does Size Matter? World Journal of Urology, 40, 2041-2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Hubert, K.C. and Palmer, J.S. (2005) Passive Dilation by Ure-teral Stenting before Ureteroscopy: Eliminating the Need for Active Dilation. Journal of Urology, 174, 1079-1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kokov, D., Manka, L., Beck, A., et al. (2019) Only Size Matters in Stone Patients: Computed Tomography Controlled Stone-Free Rates after Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urologia Internationalis, 103, 166-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Dessyn, J.F., Balssa, L., Chabannes, E., et al. (2016) Flexible Urete-rorenoscopy for Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stone in Patients with Previous Ureteral Stenting: Impact on Stone-Free Rate and Morbidity. Journal of Endourology, 30, 1084-1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Bach, P., Reicherz, A., Teichman, J., et al. (2018) Short-Term External Ureter Stenting Shows Significant Benefit in Comparison to Routine Double-J Stent Placement after Ureterorenoscopic Stone Extraction: A Prospective Randomized Trial—The Fast Track Stent Study (FaST). International Journal of Urology, 25, 717-722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Turk, C., Petrik, A., Sarica, K., et al. (2016) EAU Guidelines on Interven-tional Treatment for Urolithiasis. European Urology, 69, 475-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Polat, S., Danacioglu, Y.O., Soytas, M., et al. (2021) External Validation of the T.O.HO. Score and Derivation of the Modified T.O.HO. Score for Predicting Stone-Free Status after Flexible Ureteroscopy in Ureteral and Renal Stones. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75, e14653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Tabei, T., Ito, H., Kobayashi, K., et al. (2018) Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. BioMed Research Interna-tional, 2018, Article ID: 4526721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lumma, P.P., Schneider, P., Strauss, A., et al. (2013) Impact of Ureter-al Stenting Prior to Ureterorenoscopy on Stone- Free Rates and Complications. World Journal of Urology, 31, 855-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Wagenius, M., Oddason, K., Utter, M., et al. (2022) Factors In-fluencing Stone-Free Rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a Cohort Study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 56, 237-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Chu, L., Farris, C.A., Corcoran, A.T., et al. (2011) Preoper-ative Stent Placement Decreases Cost of Ureteroscopy. Urology, 78, 309-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Bai, P.D., Wang, T., Huang, H.C., et al. (2021) Effect of Pre-operative Double-J Ureteral Stenting before Flexible Ureterorenoscopy on Stone-Free Rates and Complications. Current Medical Science, 41, 140-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Cetti, R.J., Biers, S. and Keoghane, S.R. (2011) The Difficult Ureter: What Is the Incidence of Pre-Stenting? The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 93, 31-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Mogilevkin, Y., Sofer, M., Margel, D., et al. (2014) Predicting an Effective Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion: A Bicenter Prospective Study. Journal of Endourology, 28, 1414-1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Shields, J.M., Bird, V.G., Graves, R., et al. (2009) Impact of Preoperative Ureteral Stenting on Outcome of Ureteroscopic Treatment for Urinary Lithiasis. Journal of Urology, 182, 2768-2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Netsch, C., Knipper, S., Bach, T., et al. (2012) Impact of Preoperative Ureteral Stenting on Stone-Free Rates of Ureteroscopy for Nephroureterolithiasis: A Matched-Paired Analysis of 286 Patients. Urology, 80, 1214-1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]