成长型思维模式的研究热点及发展趋势分析
Research Hotspots and Development Trends Analysis of Growth Mindset
摘要: 目的：成长型思维是国内外近几年的研究热点，本研究对成长型思维模式的文献进行可视化分析，梳理和概括现有研究成果，讨论未来研究趋势，并提出建议。方法：本研究使用CiteSpace文献可视化软件，对Web of Science核心数据库中有关成长型思维模式的文献进行检索，检索时间从2006年1月1日至2023年9月30日，使用频数、度中心性、中介中心性、聚类分析等方法对国家(地区)、研究机构、作者、关键词，参考文献这5项指标进行可视化分析。结果：1) 成长型思维模式发文量呈现爆发式增长趋势；2) 中美两国对成长型思维模式的研究处于世界领先水平；3) 成长型思维模式的研究趋势朝着心理健康，终身学习等应用方向发展，未来对成长型思模式的研究将会诞生出更加有价值的成果。
Abstract: Objective: Growth mindset has been a research hotspot in recent years both domestically and in-ternationally. This study conducts a visual analysis of the literature on growth mindset, synthesiz-ing and summarizing existing research findings, and discussing future research trends. Methods: CiteSpace software was employed in this study to retrieve literature on the growth mindset from the Web of Science core database. The search period ranged from January 1, 2006, to September 30, 2023. Visualization analysis was conducted using methods such as frequency, degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and clustering analysis for the following five indicators: countries (regions), research institutions, authors, keywords, and references. Results: 1) The volume of posts on the growth mindset has shown explosive growth; 2) The research on growth mindset in China and the United States is at a world leading level; 3) The research trend of growth mindset is developing to-wards applications in areas such as mental health and lifelong learning, suggesting that future re-search on growth mindset will yield more valuable results.
文章引用：王文博, 郑岚, 陶维东 (2024). 成长型思维模式的研究热点及发展趋势分析. 心理学进展, 14(2), 492-506. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.142067

参考文献

[1] 陈悦, 陈超美(2014). 引文空间分析原理与应用: CiteSpace实用指南. 科学出版社.
[2] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等(2015). CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能. 科学学研究, 33(2), 242-253.
[3] 李杰, 陈超美(2022). Citespace: 科技文本挖掘及可视化(第3版). 首都经济贸易大学出版社.
[4] Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence. Journal of Ex-perimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125.[CrossRef] 
[5] Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 139, 655-701.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM Faculty Who Believe Ability Is Fixed Have Larger Racial Achievement Gaps and Inspire Less Student Motivation in Their Classes. Science Advances, 5, eaau4734.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Carroll, J. M., Muller, C., Grodsky, E., & Warren, J. R. (2017). Tracking Health Inequalities from High School to Midlife. Social Forces, 96, 591-628.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Chen, L., Chang, H., Rudoler, J., Arnardottir, E., Zhang, Y., de los Angeles, C., & Menon, V. (2022). Cognitive Training Enhances Growth Mindset in Children through Plasticity of Cortico-Striatal Cir-cuits. npj Science of Learning, 7, Article No. 30.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Claro, S., & Loeb, S. (2019). Students with Growth Mindset Learn More in School: Evidence from California’s CORE School Dis-tricts.
[11] Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth Mindset Tempers the Effects of Poverty on Academic Achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 8664-8668.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An Analysis of Learned Help-lessness: Continuous Changes in Performance, Strategy, and Achievement Cognitions Following Failure. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-462.[CrossRef] 
[13] Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self Theories: Their Roles in Motivation, Per-sonality and Development. Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press.
[14] Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
[15] Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.[CrossRef] 
[16] Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned Helplessness and Reinforcement Responsibility in Children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109-116.[CrossRef] 
[17] Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mind-sets: A View from Two Eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 481-496.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An Approach to Moti-vation and Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.[CrossRef] 
[19] Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving Adolescents’ Standardized Test Performance: An Intervention to Reduce the Effects of Stereotype Threat. Journal of Applied Develop-mental Psychology, 24, 645-662.[CrossRef] 
[20] Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying Achievement Goals and Their Impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit Theories, Attributions, and Coping: A Meaning System Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.[CrossRef] 
[22] Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus Process Praise and Criticism: Implications for Contingent Self-Worth and Coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847.[CrossRef] 
[23] Kanopka, K., Claro, S., & Loeb, S. (2020). Changes in So-cial-Emotional Learning: Examining Student Development over Time.
[24] Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Find-ing “Meaning” in Psychology: A Lay Theories Approach to Self-Regulation, Social Perception, and Social Development. American Psychologist, 61, 192-203.[CrossRef] 
[25] Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.[CrossRef] 
[26] OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. OECD.[CrossRef] 
[27] Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-Set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement. Psychological Science, 26, 784-793.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Seligman, M. E., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to Escape Traumatic Shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1-9.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Me-ta-Analyses. Psychological Science, 29, 549-571.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An Attributional Analysis of Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.[CrossRef] 
[31] Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302-314.[CrossRef] 
[32] Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What Can Be Learned from Growth Mindset Controversies? American Psychologist, 75, 1269-1284.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M. et al. (2019). A National Experiment Reveals Where a Growth Mindset Improves Achievement. Nature, 573, 364-369.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2016a). Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset during the Tran-sition to High School. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374-391.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., Kamentz, D., Ritter, G., Duckworth, A. L., Urstein, R., Gomez, E. M., Markus, H. R., Cohen, G. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2016b). Teaching a Lay Theory before College Narrows Achievement Gaps at Scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E3341-E3348.[CrossRef] [PubMed]