顺序信息在SNARC效应中的优势效应
The Advantage Effect of Order Information in SNARC Effect
摘要: SNARC效应表现为左手对小数字的反应速度更快，右手对大数字的反应速度更快。关于SNARC效应的成因，通过分析以往研究的结果，发现数字的顺序信息相较于数量信息在SNARC效应中存在一定优势。本文从具身认知理论、工作记忆理论、脑功能偏侧化理论三个方面试图解释其中的可能成因，同时提出一种可能的顺序信息加工机制。
Abstract: The SNARC effect shows that the left hand reacts faster to small numbers and the right hand reacts faster to large numbers. As for the cause of SNARC effect, through analyzing the results of previous studies, it is found that the sequence information of numbers has some advantages compared with the quantity information in SNARC effect. This paper tries to explain the possible causes from three aspects: embodied cognition theory, working memory theory and brain function lateralization the-ory, and proposes a possible sequential information processing mechanism.
文章引用：黄珂, 杨宇涵, 严格, 尹月阳 (2024). 顺序信息在SNARC效应中的优势效应. 心理学进展, 14(2), 538-545. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.142071

参考文献

[1] 陈运飞(2019). 身体表征与空间表征对SNARC效应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 郑州: 郑州大学.
[2] 戴隆农, 潘运(2021). 数字-空间联结的内在机制: 基于工作记忆的视角. 心理科学, 44(4), 793-799.
[3] 韩明, 卢忠凤(2016). 顺序信息对SNARC效应的影响: 基于官职等级数的研究. 成都师范学院学报, 32(1), 45-48.
[4] 胡林成, 熊哲宏(2016). 符号数量和非符号数量的空间表征: 5岁儿童的SNARC效应和距离效应. 心理科学, 39(2), 364-370.
[5] 金桂春, 王强强, 王有智, 吴彦文(2016). 数字SNARC效应中大小和顺序信息的分离. 心理与行为研究, 14(2), 228-233, 246.
[6] 路浩, 周新林(2012). 数学认知与学习的脑科学研究进展及其教育启示. 教育学报, (4), 62-69.
[7] 潘运, 沈德立, 王杰(2009). 不同注意提示线索条件下汉字数字加工的SNARC效应. 心理与行为研究, 7(1), 21-26.
[8] 王淑恒(2019). 新习得数量信息和顺序信息在空间数字一致性效应中的作用. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[9] 王潇, 吴国榕, 吴欣然, 邱江, 陈红(2020). 语言功能偏侧化及其与利手、功能连接的关系. 心理科学进展, 28(5), 778-789.
[10] 叶浩生(2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
[11] 张玥, 赵光, 何蔚祺, 胡中华(2022). 视觉空间伪忽视与表征伪忽视神经机制的异同. 心理科学, 45(6), 1500-1507.
[12] 周玉(2013). 顺序及数量特性对SNARC效应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
[13] Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brug-ger, P. (1998). Stimulus-Response Compatibility in Representational Space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731-735.[CrossRef] 
[14] Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2010). Creating Number Semantics through Finger Movement Perception. Cognition, 115, 46-53.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Badets, A., Bouquet, C. A., François, R., & Mauro, P. (2012). Number Generation Bias after Action Observation. Experimental Brain Research, 221, 43-49.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The Mental Represen-tation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 122, 371-396.[CrossRef] 
[17] Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is Numerical Com-parison Digital? Analogical and Symbolic Effects in Two-Digit Number Comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Felisatti, A., Laubrock, J., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). A Biological Foundation for Spatial-Numerical Associations: The Brain’s Asymmetric Frequency Tuning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1477, 44-53.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant Digits Affect Feature-Based Attention Depending on the Overlap of Neural Circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423.[CrossRef] 
[20] Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger Counting Habits Modulate Spa-tial-Numerical Associations. Cortex, 44, 386-392.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Galton, F. (1880). Visualised Numerals. Nature, 21, 252-256.[CrossRef] 
[22] Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences Is Spatially Organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95.[CrossRef] 
[23] Ginsburg, V., Van Dijck, J. P., Previtali, P., Fias, W., & Gevers, W. (2014). The Impact of Verbal Working Memory on Number-Space Associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 976-986.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Galfano, G., Elena, R., & Carlo, U. (2006). Number Magnitude Orients Atten-tion, But Not against One’s Will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869-874.[CrossRef] 
[25] Hans-Christoph, N., Guilherme, W., & Willmes, K. (2005). The Universal SNARC Effect: The Association between Number Magnitude and Space Is Amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Marc, O., Julio, S., Ziv, I., & Shai, G. (2010). Is the Future the Right Time? Experimental Psychology, 57, 308-314.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Orly, F., & Lera, B. (2010). Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence from an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430-1451.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Ruiz, F. S., Rahona, J. J., Hervás, G., Vázquez, C., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Number Magnitude Determines Gaze Direction: Spatial—Numerical Association in a Free-Choice Task. Cortex, 47, 617-620.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Shaki, S., & Fisher, M. H. (2012). Multiple Spatial Mappings in Numerical Cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 804-809.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Prpic, V., Antonia, F., Tommaso Matteo, D., Riccardo, L., Mauro, M., & Tiziano, A. (2016). Separate Mechanisms for Magnitude and Order Processing in the Spatial-Numerical Association of Re-sponse Codes (SNARC) Effect: The Strange Case of Musical Note Values. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1241-1251.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A Working Memory Account for Spatial Numerical Associations. Cognition, 119, 114-119.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Ginsburg, V., & Gevers, W. (2015). Spatial Coding of Ordinal Information in Short- and Long-Term Memory. Frontiers in Human Neu-roscience, 9, Article 111389.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Wim, F., & van Dijck, J. P. (2016). The Temporary Nature of Number-Space Interactions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale, 70, 33-40.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Wim, G., Tom, V., Bert, R., Bernie, C., & Wim, F. (2006). Numbers and Space: A Computational Model of the SNARC Effect. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32-44.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Zhao, H., Chen, C., Zhang, H., Zhou, X., & Mei, L. (2012). Is Order the Defining Feature of Magnitude Representation? An ERP Study on Learning Numerical Magnitude and Spatial Order of Artificial Symbols. PLOS ONE, 11, e49565.[CrossRef] [PubMed]