债券虚假陈述揭露日的判断标准分析
Criteria Analysis for Determining the Disclosure Date of Bond False Statements
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2024.102119, PDF,   
作者: 朱文菁:华东政法大学经济法学院,上海
关键词: 债券虚假陈述揭露日媒体揭露日 Bond False Statements Disclosure Date Media Disclosure Date
摘要: 对于债券虚假陈述揭露日的确定,可以沿用判断股票虚假陈述揭露日的核心,但从揭露信息发出端和接收端分析,具体标准上应有所区别。应当兼顾债券市场机构投资者为主导的特性以及专业媒体的监督力度,关注专业投资者的信息获取能力与信息传导属性,综合评估揭露信息在债券市场的传播范围和传播效果。在传播范围上,债券市场的信息分布更为集中,应关注有影响力的媒体报道对于发行人偿债能力变化揭露产生的影响;在传播效果上,除注重债券价量的明显变化外,如遇债券停牌的情况,可以将媒体反应作为市场化证据纳入考虑。
Abstract: In determining the disclosure date of bond false statements, the core criteria for judging the disclosure date of false statements in stocks can be applied, but there should be specific differences in the analysis from the perspective of information dissemination and reception. It is necessary to take into account the characteristics of the bond market dominated by institutional investors and the supervisory intensity of professional media. Attention should be given to the information acquisition ability and information transmis-sion attributes of professional investors, and a comprehensive assessment of the scope and effects of information disclosure in the bond market should be conducted. In terms of dissemination scope, the information distribution in the bond market is more concentrated, and the impact of influential media reports on the issuer's debt repayment capacity should be considered. Regarding the effects of dissemination, in addition to focusing on significant changes in bond prices and volumes, in cases where bond trading is suspended, media reactions can be considered as market evidence.
文章引用:朱文菁. 债券虚假陈述揭露日的判断标准分析[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(2): 876-883. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.102119

参考文献

[1] 左永刚. 证监会59个问答柔性解读公司债 市场化与风险意识成关键词[N]. 证券日报, 2016-11-17(A01).
[2] 邢会强. 银行间债券市场虚假陈述民事责任纠纷的法律适用[J]. 多层次资本市场研究, 2022(2): 168-178.
[3] 李虹含. 东京机构债券市场的发展与启示[J]. 清华金融评论, 2020(9): 101-104.
[4] 朱锦清. 证券法学[M]. 第五版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2022: 11.
[5] 缪因知. 债券虚假陈述之作用力与赔偿责任[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 165-180.
[6] 宋华健. 一个被忽视的命题: 虚假陈述讨论中的股债差异及其修正[J]. 金融发展研究, 2023(5): 54-60.
[7] Hartzmark, M., Schipani, C.A. and Nejat Seyhun, H. (2011) Fraud on the Market: Analysis of the Efficiency of the Corporate Bond Market. Columbia Business Law Review, 2011, 654-716.
[8] 朱松. 债券市场参与者关注会计信息质量吗[J]. 南开管理评论论, 2013, 16(3): 16-25.
[9] 陈洁. 证券民事赔偿诉讼取消前置程序的司法应对——以虚假陈述民事赔偿为视角[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(5): 63-70+78.
[10] 张欣然. “胜通债”虚假陈述案一审宣判 揭露日认定引发热议[N]. 上海证券报, 2023-03-20(004).
[11] 李有星, 潘政. 证券市场虚假陈述揭露日的再认识[J]. 投资者, 2018(2): 110-128.
[12] 陈洁. 虚假陈述民事赔偿制度的新发展理念及其规范实现[J]. 法律适用, 2022(3): 48-60.
[13] 樊健. 我国证券虚假陈述被揭露规定的反思: 以公告证监会立案调查通知书为中心[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2022(3): 99-114.
[14] 樊健. 欺诈市场理论在公司债券虚假陈述纠纷中的适用[J]. 财经法学, 2020(2): 3-19.
[15] 杨旭, 何积华. 证券虚假陈述民事案件裁判规则研究[M]. 北京大学出版社, 2018: 168.
[16] 曹明哲. 立案调查通知公告之日作为虚假陈述揭露日的正当性解释[J]. 证券法苑, 2019, 26(1): 341-358.