中小微企业跨境争议在线解决机制研究
Study on Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Cross-Border Disputes Involving Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
摘要: 缺乏有效的争端解决机制已经成为数字经济时代下中小微企业从事跨境贸易的最主要挑战之一,对于可支配资源有限、抗风险能力弱的中小微企业而言更是如此。传统的纠纷解决方式难以满足中小微企业对于跨境争议解决服务的个性化需求。随着科技发展和各国的实践探索,在线纠纷解决机制(ODR)凭借其高效、灵活、便捷、低廉的比较优势在跨境争议解决领域表现出蓬勃的发展态势和巨大潜力。同时,ODR也能够较好地与国际上现有的法律框架进行衔接。今后中小微跨境争议在线解决机制的发展可从优化平台建设,贴合中小微企业解纷需求;加强国际合作,促进ODR协作框架;促进多方联动,提高ODR可接近性三方面对该机制进行完善。
Abstract: The lack of effective dispute resolution mechanism has become one of the main challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises engaged in cross-border trade in the digital economy era, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises with limited resources and weak risk resistance. Traditional dispute resolution methods are hart to meet the personalized needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for cross-border dispute resolution. With the development of technology and practical exploration in various countries, online dispute resolution mechanisms (ODR) have shown a thriving development trend and huge potential in the field of cross- border dispute resolution because of their comparative advantages of efficiency, flexibility, convenience, and affordability. At the same time, ODR can also better connect with existing international legal frameworks. In the future, the development of Msmes cross-border online dispute resolution mechanism can be improved from the following three aspects: optimize the platform construction to meet the needs of Msmes to resolve disputes; strengthening international cooperation and promoting the ODR collaboration framework; promoting multi-party interaction and improve the accessibility of ODR.
文章引用:张迎新. 中小微企业跨境争议在线解决机制研究[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(2): 884-892. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.102120

参考文献

[1] WTO (2016) World Trade Report 2016: Levelling the Trading Field for SMEs.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/world_trade_report16_e.pdf
[2] ABAC (November 2018) Realizing the Untapped Potential of MSMEs in APEC—Practical Recommendations for Enhancing Cross-Border Trade.
https://www2.abaconline.org/assets/2018/ABAC_Research/ABAC_IV_Marshall_School_Final_Report_MSMEs_trade_11132018_compressed.pdf
[3] APEC Economic Committee (April 2022) Stocktake of APEC Online Dispute Resolution Technologies.
https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/publications/2022/4/stocktake-of-apec-online-dispute-resolution-technologies/222_ec_stocktake-of-apec-odr-technologies.pdf?sfvrsn=a36c33ff_2
[4] 弗里德里希•K.荣格. 法律选择与涉外司法[M]. 霍政欣, 徐妮娜, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 64.
[5] 霍政欣. 国际私法[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2017: 307-309.
[6] APEC Economic Committee (March 2022) Workshop on Implementing the APEC ODR Collaborative Framework.
https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/publications/2022/3/workshop-on-implementing-the-apec-odr-collaborative-framework/222_ec_workshop-on-implementing-the-apec-odr-collaborative-framework.pdf?sfvrsn=ad0fa23_2
[7] Roberge, J.-F. and Fraser, V. (2019) Access to Commercial Justice: A Roadmap for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) De-sign for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (Smes) Disputes. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 35, 13-14.
[8] IPSOS Australia (2007) Dispute Resolution in Victoria: Small Business Survey.
https://www.consumer.vic.gov.au/library/publications/resources-and-education/research/dispute-resolution-in-victoria-small-business-survey-2007-report.pdf
[9] 罗英. 数字技术风险程序规制的法理重述[J]. 法学评论, 2022, 40(5): 151-160.
[10] 赵杨. 人工智能时代的司法信任及其构建[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021, 24(4): 73-82.