大学生新冠病毒感染认知现状及防护行为现状及影响因素研究

Study on the Cognitive Status and Protective Behaviors of College Students with COVID-19 Infection and Its Influencing Factors

摘要: 目的：了解南充两所高校在校大学生对新冠病毒感染的认知和防护行为情况，对比医学院与非医学院学生对新冠病毒感染认知水平差异，为开展健康教育提供依据。方法：采用随机抽样并利用问卷星平台在南充川北医学院和西华师范大学两所高校发放电子问卷进行问卷调查分析。结果：共收回有效问卷305份，有效率97.44%，调查对象以女性(71.1%)、年龄以 > 20岁(61.3%)、年级以大四及以上(44.6%)、已在实习(69.5%)、川北医学院(73.1%)为主；南充两所高校大学生新冠病毒感染相关基础知识和防护知识平均得分分别为(4.69 ± 1.46)分和(6.57 ± 1.74)分，基础知识认知方面不同年龄组、年级和是否实习得分差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)；防护知识认知方面不同性别和答题所用时间和得分差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)；多因素logistic 二元回归分析发现，是否实习与学生防护行为频率有关(P < 0.05)，而答题时间、性别、就读学校与学生防护行为频率无关(P > 0.05)，川北医学院实习生更易采取高频率防护行为，但西华师范大学实习生与防护行为频率关系相关性无统计学意义(P > 0.05)；调查对象主要通过新媒体或传统广电媒体渠道获取信息(82.0%)。结论：大学生对新冠病毒感染的了解不够全面，认知水平仍有待进一步提高，应继续加强相关知识的健康宣教并促进健康行为的采纳。

Abstract: Objective: To understand the cognition and protective behavior of college students on COVID-19 in-fection in two colleges and universities in Nanchong, and to compare the difference between medi-cal college students and non-medical college students on the cognition of COVID-19 infection, so as to provide basis for health education. The method used random sampling and distributed electronic questionnaires on the Question Star platform to Nanchong Chuanbei Medical College and Xihua Normal University for questionnaire survey analysis. A total of 305 valid questionnaires were col-lected, with an effective rate of 97.44%. The survey subjects were mainly females (71.1%), those over 20 years old (61.3%), those in their senior year or above (44.6%), those who were already in-terning (69.5%), and those from North Sichuan Medical College (73.1%); The average scores of basic knowledge and protection knowledge related to COVID-19 infection of college students in Nanchong were (4.69 ± 1.46) points and (6.57 ± 1.74) points, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the scores of different age groups, grades and whether to practice in basic knowledge cognition (P < 0.05); There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the cognitive as-pects of protective knowledge among different genders, as well as in the time and score required to answer questions; Multivariate logistic binary regression analysis found that internship was related to the frequency of student protective behavior (P < 0.05), while answering time, gender, and school of study were not related to the frequency of student protective behavior (P > 0.05). Interns from North Sichuan Medical College were more likely to adopt high-frequency protective behavior, but there was no statistically significant correlation between interns from West China Normal Universi-ty and the frequency of protective behavior (P > 0.05); The survey subjects mainly obtained infor-mation through new media or traditional radio and television media channels (82.0%). Conclusion: College students' understanding of COVID-19 infection is not comprehensive enough, and their cog-nitive level still needs to be further improved. They should continue to strengthen health education on relevant knowledge and promote the adoption of health behaviors.