反垄断民事纠纷可仲裁之理论证成

Theoretical Proof of Arbitrability in Antitrust Civil Disputes

摘要: 《反垄断法》兼具公法与私法的性质，不同于普通的方式产生的民事纠纷，且反垄断案件涉及公共政策与公共利益，往往损害多方利益，甚至直接通过转售的方式让消费者承担损失的情况。对于反垄断民事纠纷可否申请仲裁，在学界存在争议。各国对反垄断民事争议的处理方式也有不同，我国需要与国际处理反垄断民事纠纷的方式接轨，以保障我国国民的利益，本文从我国相关法律规定论述反垄断民事纠纷的可仲裁性。

Abstract: Because the antitrust law has the features of public law and private law, it is different from the civil dispute appeared in an ordinary way. And anti-monopoly cases involve in public policies and public benefits and commonly damage the benefits of many sides. There are disputes in the academy about whether anti-monopoly civil disputes can apply for arbitration. The handling of antitrust civil disputes varies among countries, and China needs to align with the international approach to handling antitrust civil disputes to safeguard the interests of its citizens. This article discusses the arbitrability of antitrust civil disputes from the perspective of relevant legal provisions in China.