退行性腰椎滑脱的微创治疗进展
Progress in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.142496, PDF,   
作者: 梅 玺, 胡友鹏, 樊效鸿*:成都中医药大学临床医学院,四川 成都;四川省中医院骨科,四川 成都
关键词: 退行性腰椎滑脱脊柱微创脊柱内镜手术治疗Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Spinal Endoscopy Surgical Treatment
摘要: 退行性腰椎滑脱是脊柱外科常见病,主要症状表现为长期慢性腰腿痛及麻木。对于症状严重影响患者生活质量的腰椎滑脱应及时选择手术干预。既往以传统开放手术为主,创伤大,出血量大,卧床时间长,恢复时间长等缺点,随着近几年脊柱微创理念提出,脊柱外科医师越来越多选择脊柱微创手术,其具有:切口小,出血量少,术后下地时间早等优势。本文选取了近几年应用脊柱微创治疗退行性腰椎滑脱的文献,综合分析比较各类脊柱微创手术各自优缺点,旨在为脊柱外科医生临床提供参考。
Abstract: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common disease in spinal surgery, characterized by long-term chronic lower back and leg pain and numbness. For lumbar spondylolisthesis with severe symptoms that affect the patient’s quality of life, timely surgical intervention should be chosen. In the past, traditional open surgery was mainly used, which had disadvantages such as large trauma, large bleeding, long bed rest time, and long recovery time. With the introduction of the concept of spinal minimally invasive surgery in recent years, more and more spinal surgeons have chosen spinal minimally invasive surgery, which has advantages such as small incision, low bleeding, and early postoperative landing time. This article selects literature on the application of minimally invasive spinal surgery in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in recent years, comprehensively analyzes and compares the advantages and disadvantages of various minimally invasive spinal surgeries, aiming to provide clinical reference for spinal surgeons.
文章引用:梅玺, 胡友鹏, 樊效鸿. 退行性腰椎滑脱的微创治疗进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(2): 3543-3549. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.142496

参考文献

[1] Sun, W.X., Liu, H.N., Chen, M.T., Lin, Y.P., Wang, H.S. and Chen, B.L. (2022) Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. EFORT Open Review, 7, 663-670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Chan, A.K., Sharma, V., Robinson, L.C. and Mummaneni, P.V. (2019) Summary of Guidelines for the Treatment of Lumbarspondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 30, 353-364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Kang, Y.N., Ho, Y.W., Chu, W., et al. (2022) Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Global Spine Journal, 12, 493-502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 罗志剑, 孙良业, 丁旗, 等. 两种术式治疗退变性腰椎滑脱的疗效比较[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2023, 26(3): 333-337.
[5] Chan, A.K., Bydon, M., Bisson, E.F., et al. (2023) Mini-mally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade Ⅰ Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: 5-Year Follow-Up from the Prospective Multicenter Quality Outcomes Database Registry. Neurosurgical Focus, 54, E2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Foley, K.T., Holly, L.T. and Schwender, J.D. (2003) Mini-mally Invasive Lumbar Fusion. Spine, 28, S26-S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Cui, G.Y., Han, X.G., Wei, Y., Liu, Y.J., He, D., Sun, Y.Q., Liu, B. and Tian, W. (2021) Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 13, 1960-1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Zhou, T., Fan, W., Gu, Y., Che, W., Zhang, L. and Wang, Y. (2023) Per-cutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery Combined with Mini-Incision OLIF and Anterolateral Screws Rod Fix-ation vs. MIS-TLIF for Surgical Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article 1049448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ali, E.M.S., El-Hewala, T.A., Eladawy, A.M. and Sheta, R.A. (2022) Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) Influence Functional Outcomes and Spinopelvic Parameters in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis? Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17, Article No. 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Tang, A.R., Chanbour, H., Steinle, A.M., et al. (2023) Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery, 93, 186-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 顾祖超, 张宇, 李果, 等. 经椎间孔与经后外侧入路椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2017, 15(4): 200-205.
[12] He, W., He, D. and Tian, W. (2020) Evaluation of Lumbar Fusion Using the Anterior to Psoas Approach for the Treatment of L5/S1 Spondylolisthesis. Medicine, 99, e20014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Xu, D.S., Walker, C.T., Godzik, J., et al. (2018) Minimally Invasive Anterior, Lateral, and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review. Annals of Translational Medicine, 6, Article 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Aspalter, S., Stefanits, H., Maier, C.J., Radl, C., Wagner, H., Her-mann, P., Aichholzer, M., Stroh, N., Gruber, A. and Senker, W. (2023) Reduction of Spondylolisthesis and Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF). BMC Surgery, 23, Article No. 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jesse, C.M., Schwarzenbach, O., Ulrich, C.T., Häni, L., Raabe, A. and Schär, R.T. (2022) Safety and Efficacy of Stand- Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Low-Grade L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Brain Spine, 2, Article ID: 100861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Fleege, C., Arabmotlagh, M., Rother, W., Rauschmann, M. and Rickert, M. (2016) [ALIF and PLIF Interposition in Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis L5/S1: LongtermComparison of Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF-PLIF)]. Der Orthopäde, 45, 760-769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Sato, J., Ohtori, S., Orita, S., et al. (2017) Radiographic Evalua-tion of Indirect Decompression of Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerated Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. European Spine Journal, 26, 671-678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lv, H., Yang, Y.S., Zhou, J.H., Guo, Y., Chen, H., Luo, F., Xu, J.Z., Zhang, Z.R. and Zhang, Z.H. (2023) Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis. Neurospine, 20, 824-834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Nikaido, T. and Konno, S.I. (2022) Usefulness of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review. Medicina, 58, Article 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Zheng, B., Leary, O.P., Liu, D.D., Nuss, S., Barrios-Anderson, A., Darveau, S., Syed, S., Gokaslan, Z.L., Telfeian, A.E., Fridley, J.S. and Oyelese, A.A. (2022) Radiographic Analysis of Neuroforaminal and Central Canal Decompression Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. North American Spine Society Journal, 10, Article ID: 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 李振宙, 侯树勋. 腰椎退行性疾病微创外科治疗概况及展望[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2022, 11(9): 641-647.
[22] Han, X.G., Tang, G.Q., Han, X., Xing, Y.G., Zhang, Q., He, D. and Tian, W. (2021) Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Orthopaedic Sur-gery, 13, 2093-2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Li, R., Shao, X., Li, X., Liu, Y. and Jiang, W. (2021) Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Spino-Pelvic Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). Medicine, 100, e23783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Zhao, W., Zhou, C., Zhang, H., Guo, J., Han, J., Lin, A., Wang, Y. and Ma, X. (2023) Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Stand-Alone and OLIF with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24, Article No. 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Wu, J., Ao, J., Xu, Z., Li, G., Ge, T., Wang, Y., Tao, X., Tian, W. and Sun, Y. (2023) Comparisons of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Cohort Study with A 2-Year Follow-Up. Frontiers in Surgery, 10, Article 1115823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] He, D., He, W., Tian, W., Liu, B., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Xing, Y., Lang, Z., Wang, Y., Ma, T. and Liu, M. (2023) Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 Grade-1 De-generative Spondylolisthesis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 15, 1477-1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 张斌, 孔清泉, 戎利民. 经皮内镜辅助腰椎椎间融合术的技术利弊分析及趋势展望[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(6): 653-659.
[28] Van Isseldyk, F., Liu, Y., Kim, J.H., et al. (2023) Full-Endoscopic Foraminotomy in Low-Grade Degenerative and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Patient-Specific Tailored Approach. European Spine Journal, 32, 2828-2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Song, Z., Zhu, W., Zheng, J., Wu, G., Li, T., Huang, A., Bian, J., Chen, C. and Li, H. (2022) Comparison of Short- Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF in the Treatment of Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Diseases. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article 922930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Chen, H., Zheng, G., Bian, Z., Hou, C., Li, M., Zhang, Z., Zhu, L. and Wang, X. (2023) Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Observational Study. Journal of Or-thopaedic Surgery and Research, 18, Article No. 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Son, S., Yoo, B.R., Lee, S.G., Kim, W.K. and Jung, J.M. (2022) Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 65, 539-548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Zhu, L., Cai, T., Shan, Y., et al. (2021) Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician, 24, 441-452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Jacquot, F. and Gastambide, D. (2013) Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is It Worth It? International Orthopaedics, 37, 1507-1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] 余可谊. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术的发展简史、全球现状与中国使命[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(10): 1181-1185.
[35] Heo, D.H., Son, S.K., Eum, J.H., et al. (2017) Fully Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Percutaneous Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Results. Neurosurgical Focus, 43, E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] 余洋, 王永涛, 谢一舟, 等. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜与3D显微镜辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的中期疗效比较[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2023, 37(1): 52-58.
[37] Guo, W., Li, T., Feng, C., Yu, Y., Hu, Y. and Fan, X. (2023) Clinical Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Verse 3D Microscope-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Segment Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study with 24-Month Follow-Up. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18, Article No. 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] 宋鑫, 镐英杰, 任志楠, 等. 单侧双通道内镜腰椎融合术治疗Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱的初步研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 22(10): 814-819.
[39] 郭文龙, 李统, 余洋, 等. 单侧双通道内镜下腰椎融合术后隐性失血的危险因素分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2023, 33(6): 497-504.
[40] Bui, A.T., Trinh, G.M., Wu, M.H., et al. (2023) Indications for and Outcomes of Three Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Ap-proaches for the Decompression of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics, 13, Article 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Kim, J.E., Choi, D.J. and Park, E.J. (2020) Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Asian Spine Journal, 14, 790-800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]