TM4SF19——一种新的膀胱尿路上皮癌诊断和预后的生物标志物
TM4SF19—A New Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.142506, PDF,   
作者: 刘蕴博, 李延江*:青岛大学附属医院泌尿外科,山东 青岛
关键词: TM4SF19膀胱尿路上皮癌诊断预后生物标志物TM4SF19 Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis Prognosis Biomarkers
摘要: 近年来科学研究证实四次跨膜L6超家族中的TM4SF19在肿瘤的发生、发展中发挥着重要作用,但TM4SF19在膀胱尿路上皮癌(BLCA)中的预后和免疫侵袭中的作用仍不清楚。本研究探讨TM4SF19在肿瘤组织中的表达及其与免疫侵袭的关系,并确定其在BLCA患者中的预后作用。本研究从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库中获取了患者的表达谱和临床信息。Mann-Whitney U检验(Wilcoxon秩和检验)分析BLCA中TM4SF19的差异表达。通过功能富集分析以探索所涉及的潜在信号通路和生物学功能。使用单样本基因集富集分析评估免疫细胞浸润。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析来确定TM4SF19的预后价值。构建列线图来预测癌症诊断后1年、5年和10年的总生存(OS)率。结果:TM4SF19在BLCA中过度表达。TM4SF19高表达组中多条途径被显著富集,其中不乏多条肿瘤相关途径及免疫相关途径。TM4SF19表达与巨噬细胞、Th1细胞和其他免疫细胞呈正相关,但与NKCD56bright细胞和肥大细胞呈负相关。TM4SF19的表达水平与T分期、N分期、年龄显着相关。TM4SF19过度表达会导致总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存率显着下降。多变量Cox分析将TM4SF19确定为OS的独立危险因素。使用校准图分析了列线图的准确性,显示1年、5年和10年的实际OS值与预测OS值之间具有良好的一致性。结果表明,TM4SF19的上调与疾病的进展和不良预后相关。TM4SF19有望作为BLCA患者诊断和预后的生物标志物。
Abstract: In recent years, scientific research has confirmed that TM4SF19 in the four-transmembrane L6 su-perfamily plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. However, the role of TM4SF19 in the prognosis and immune invasion of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) remains unclear. This study explores the expression of TM4SF19 in tumor tissues and its relationship with immune invasion and determines its prognostic role in BLCA patients. This study obtained patients’ expression profiles and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Mann- Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank sum test) analyzed the differential expression of TM4SF19 in BLCA. Functional enrichment analysis was performed to explore the potential signaling pathways and bio-logical functions involved. Immune cell infiltration was assessed using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the prognostic value of TM4SF19. Nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 5, and 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Results: TM4SF19 is overexpressed in BLCA. Multiple pathways were significantly enriched in the TM4SF19 high-expression group, including many tumor-related pathways and immune-related pathways. TM4SF19 expression was positively correlated with macrophages, Th1 cells, and other immune cells, but negatively correlated with NKCD56 bright cells and mast cells. The expression level of TM4SF19 was significantly related to the T stage, N stage, and age. Overexpression of TM4SF19 results in a significant decrease in overall sur-vival (OS) and disease-specific survival. Multivariate Cox analysis identified TM4SF19 as an inde-pendent risk factor for OS. The accuracy of the nomogram was analyzed using calibration plots, showing good agreement between actual and predicted OS values at 1, 5, and 10 years. The results showed that upregulation of TM4SF19 was associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. TM4SF19 is expected to serve as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of BLCA patients.
文章引用:刘蕴博, 李延江. TM4SF19——一种新的膀胱尿路上皮癌诊断和预后的生物标志物[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(2): 3616-3632. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.142506

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Martinez Rodriguez, R.H., Buisan Rueda, O. and Ibarz, L. (2017) Bladder Cancer: Present and Future. Medicina Clínica (Barc), 149, 449-455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Hurst, C.D., et al. (2017) Genomic Subtypes of Non-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Distinct Metabolic Profile and Female Gender Bias in KDM6A Mutation Frequency. Cancer Cell, 32, 701-715.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Smolensky, D., Rathore, K. and Cekanova, M. (2016) Molecular Targets in Urothelial Cancer: Detection, Treatment, and Animal Models of Bladder Cancer. Drug Design, Develop-ment and Therapy, 10, 3305-3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kojima, T., et al. (2017) Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Bladder Cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 207-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Lin, T.Y., et al. (2016) Novel Theranostic Nanoporphyrins for Photodynamic Diagnosis and Trimodal Therapy for Bladder Cancer. Biomaterials, 104, 339-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Zhou, J., et al. (2022) An Oncogenic JMJD6-DGAT1 Axis Tunes the Epigenetic Regulation of Lipid Droplet Formation in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Molecular Cell, 82, 3030-3044.E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wright, M.D., Ni, J. and Rudy, G.B. (2000) The L6 Membrane Proteins—A New Four-Transmembrane Superfamily. Protein Science, 9, 1594-1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Tang, Q., et al. (2020) TM4SF1 Promotes EMT and Cancer Stemness via the Wnt/beta-Catenin/SOX2 Pathway in Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 39, Article No. 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Rahim, N.S., et al. (2023) Three Members of Transmembrane-4-Superfamily, TM4SF1, TM4SF4, and TM4SF5, as Emerging Anticancer Molecular Targets against Cancer Phenotypes and Chemoresistance. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 16, Article 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Jung, J.W., et al. (2020) Amino Acid Transporters as Tetraspanin TM4SF5 Binding Partners. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 52, 7-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hou, S., et al. (2022) TM4SF1 Promotes Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metastasis by Interacting with Integrin α6. Cell Death & Disease, 13, Article No. 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Huang, Y.K., Fan, X.G. and Qiu, F. (2016) TM4SF1 Promotes Proliferation, Invasion, and Metastasis in Human Liver Cancer Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17, Article 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Gao, C., et al. (2019) TM4SF1 Is a Potential Target for Anti-Invasion and Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer. BMC Cancer, 19, Article No. 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jung, K., et al. (2021) TM4SF4 and LRRK2 Are Potential Therapeutic Targets in Lung and Breast Cancers through Outlier Analysis. Cancer Research and Treatment, 53, 9-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Zhang, F., et al. (2022) TYMS-TM4SF4 Axis Promotes the Progression of Colorectal Cancer by EMT and Upregulating Stem Cell Marker. American Journal of Cancer Research, 12, 1009-1026.
[17] Jung, O., et al. (2012) Tetraspan TM4SF5-Dependent Direct Activation of FAK and Metastatic Po-tential of Hepatocarcinoma Cells. Journal of Cell Science, 125, 5960-5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lee, S.A., et al. (2008) Tetraspanin TM4SF5 Mediates Loss of Contact Inhibition through Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Hepatocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118, 1354-1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Qin, X., et al. (2022) Immune-Related Gene TM4SF18 Could Promote the Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Cells and Predict the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients. Molecular Oncology, 16, 4043-4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Singhal, M., et al. (2019) TM4SF18 Is Aberrantly Expressed in Pancreatic Cancer and Regulates Cell Growth. PLOS ONE, 14, e0211711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Luo, M., et al. (2022) TM4SF19-AS1 Facilitates the Prolifer-ation of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Recruiting WDR5 to Mediate TM4SF19. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 65, Article 101849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 张蕊. 基于生物信息学分析TM4SF19在肺鳞状细胞癌中的表达及意义[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2023.
[23] 俞思薇, 王红霞. 四次跨膜蛋白超家族成员与肿瘤的研究进展[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2022, 44(4): 672-681.
[24] 王坤. TM4SF1在甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移中的作用及机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2023.
[25] 李昆, 等. 乳腺癌患者血清CEACAM1、TM4SF1水平变化及其临床意义[J]. 山东医药, 2022, 62(16): 14-18.
[26] 李昌安, 等. TM4SF1水平与胃癌病理特征的相关性[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2021, 36(10): 1614-1616+1643.
[27] 霍宏志, 梁金, 柴尔青. TM4SF1与脑胶质瘤病理分级及预后的相关性[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2022, 27(6): 447-451.
[28] 胡效林, 等. SLC1A5协同TM4SF1通过mTOR信号通路调控食管鳞癌细胞迁移[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(14): 33-39+45.
[29] 盖欣欣, 等. TM4SF1对结直肠癌细胞增殖、迁移及凋亡的影响[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2023, 44(3): 1-4+13.
[30] Vivian, J., et al. (2017) Toil Enables Reproducible, Open Source, Big Biomedical Data Analyses. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 314-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ritchie, M.E., et al. (2015) limma Powers Differential Expression Analyses for RNA-Sequencing and Microarray Studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Love, M.I., Huber, W. and Anders, S. (2014) Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15, Article No. 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Yu, G., et al. (2012) clusterProfiler: An R Package for Com-paring Biological Themes among Gene Clusters. OMICS, 16, 284-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Subramanian, A., et al. (2005) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis: A Knowledge-Based Approach for Interpreting Genome-Wide Expression Profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 15545-15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R. and Guinney, J. (2013) GSVA: Gene Set Variation Analysis for Microarray and RNA-Seq Data. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, Article No. 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Bindea, G., et al. (2013) Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Intratumoral Immune Cells Reveal the Immune Landscape in Human Cancer. Immunity, 39, 782-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Gu, Z., et al. (2014) circlize Implements and Enhances Cir-cular Visualization in R. Bioinformatics, 30, 2811-2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Liu, J., et al. (2018) An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clin-ical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics. Cell, 173, 400-416.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Takan, I., et al. (2023) “In the Light of Evolution”: Keratins as Exceptional Tumor Biomarkers. PeerJ, 11, e15099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Karsch, S., et al. (2020) An Intact Keratin Network Is Crucial for Me-chanical Integrity and Barrier Function in Keratinocyte Cell Sheets. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 77, 4397-4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Zhang, N., et al. (2017) Keratin 23 Promotes Te-lomerase Reverse Transcriptase Expression and Human Colorectal Cancer Growth. Cell Death & Disease, 8, e2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Bilandzic, M., et al. (2019) Keratin-14 (KRT14) Positive Leader Cells Mediate Mesothelial Clearance and Invasion by Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel), 11, Article 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Zhao, H., et al. (2021) Inflammation and Tumor Progression: Signaling Pathways and Targeted Intervention. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 6, Article No. 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Paluch, E.K., Aspalter, I.M. and Sixt, M. (2016) Focal Adhe-sion-Independent Cell Migration. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 32, 469-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Eke, I. and Cordes, N. (2015) Focal Adhesion Sig-naling and Therapy Resistance in Cancer. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 31, 65-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Banyard, J. and Bielenberg, D.R. (2015) The Role of EMT and MET in Cancer Dissemination. Connective Tissue Research, 56, 403-413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Castaño, Z., et al. (2018) IL-1β Inflammatory Response Driven by Primary Breast Cancer Prevents Metastasis-Initiating Cell Colonization. Nature Cell Biology, 20, 1084-1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] 范彦鹏. 基于单细胞RNA测序分析膀胱癌组织肿瘤微环境的转录异质性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
[49] 叶峻江, 等. 肿瘤相关成纤维细胞在膀胱癌发生发展中的研究进展[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 38(10): 796-802.
[50] 张建军, 等. 膀胱肿瘤微环境细胞亚群分布及与复发的关系[J]. 临床医药实践, 2023, 32(8): 570-573.
[51] 张庆磊, 等. 肿瘤微环境中CD4+T细胞浸润、MFAP5与膀胱癌患者预后关系的临床研究[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2023, 39(8): 1719-1723.
[52] Schreiber, R.D., Old, L.J. and Smyth, M.J. (2011) Cancer Immunoediting: Integrating Immunity’s Roles in Cancer Suppression and Promotion. Science, 331, 1565-1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Cassetta, L. and Pollard, J.W. (2018) Targeting Macrophages: Therapeutic Approaches in Cancer. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17, 887-904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] DeNardo, D.G. and Ruffell, B. (2019) Macrophages as Regulators of Tumour Immunity and Immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology, 19, 369-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Lorvik, K.B., et al. (2016) Adoptive Transfer of Tumor-Specific Th2 Cells Eradicates Tumors by Triggering an in Situ Inflammatory Immune Response. Cancer Research, 76, 6864-6876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[56] Dai, M., et al. (2018) Tumor Regression and Cure Depends on Sustained Th1 Responses. Journal of Immunotherapy, 41, 369-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] DeNardo, D.G., et al. (2009) CD4(+) T Cells Regulate Pul-monary Metastasis of Mammary Carcinomas by Enhancing Protumor Properties of Macrophages. Cancer Cell, 16, 91-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Espinoza, J.A., et al. (2016) Cytokine Profiling of Tumor Interstitial Fluid of the Breast and Its Relationship with Lymphocyte Infiltration and Clinicopathological Character-istics. Oncoimmunology, 5, e1248015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[59] Feng, Q., et al. (2012) Th2 Type Inflammation Promotes the Gradual Progression of HPV-Infected Cervical Cells to Cervical Carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology, 127, 412-419.