公开盗窃论中入罪问题的思考
Reflection on the Issue of Criminalization in the Theory of Public Theft
摘要: 在盗窃罪中增加公开盗窃作为入罪情形,否认秘密要素作为入罪条件是近年来不少学者所支持的理论,为此学者们提出了盗窃罪与抢夺罪在坚持秘密要素下会导致的入罪问题,本文将探讨这些入罪问题是否在中国的法律体系中确实存在,公开盗窃论是否确有必要。
Abstract:
In recent years, many scholars have supported the theory of adding public theft as a criminal offense and denying the use of secret elements as a condition for criminal offense in theft. Therefore, scholars have proposed the problems of criminal offense caused by adhering to secret elements in theft and robbery. This article will explore whether these criminal issues do exist in China’s legal system and whether the theory of public theft is indeed necessary.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张明楷. 刑法分则的解释原理(上) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 296.
|
|
[2]
|
张明楷. 盗窃与抢夺的界限[J]. 法学家, 2006(2): 119-131.
|
|
[3]
|
阮齐林. 论盗窃与抢夺界分的实益、倾向和标准[J]. 当代法学, 2013, 27(1): 76-82.
|
|
[4]
|
高国其. 公开盗窃理论构建的认识论与方法论质评[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 20(3): 120-128.
|
|
[5]
|
张明楷. 论表面的构成要件要素[J]. 中国法学, 2009(2): 92-103.
|
|
[6]
|
徐光华. “公开盗窃说”质疑[J]. 法商研究, 2015, 32(3): 94-102.
|