行政协议的法律适用问题研究
Research on Legal Application of Administrative Agreement
DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.122172, PDF,   
作者: 潘佳康:西安工程大学人文社会科学学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 行政协议法律适用行政诉讼Administrative Agreement Application of Law Administrative Litigation
摘要: 《行政诉讼法》的颁布,标志着我国行政协议正式进入行政诉讼范围。《最高人民法院关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》全面实施,但是仍然存在诸多的现实问题,对行政协议法律适用问题进一步研讨,有助于理清行政协议的法律适用规则,能理顺政府与市场的关系,同时也能明晰国家治理与私人自治的边界。本文主要讨论行政协议的法律适用问题,了解行政协议的基础概念,分析行政协议的特点,探讨行政协议的法律适用问题研究意义,查阅文献及资料,明确国内行政协议相关的研究现状,总结与本课题研究的相关问题;对比域外有关的法律制度,分析已有法律适用模式并从中得出启示,结合已经总结出的行政协议适用相关问题,对国内行政协议的法律适用问题进行探讨分析,行政协议因其特殊性,应该针对不同的情形,采取适用单一行政法或者行政法和民法相结合的方式。
Abstract: The promulgation of Administrative Procedure Law marks the formal entry of administrative agreement into the scope of administrative litigation. The Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases have been fully implemented, but there are still many practical problems. Further research on law in administrative agreements will help law application rule of some administrative agreements. It can straighten out the relationship between the government and the market, and at the same time clarify the boundary between state governance and private autonomy. This paper mainly discusses the legal application of administrative agreement, understands the basic concept of administrative agreement, analyzes the characteristics of administrative agreement, discusses the significance of the research on the legal application of administrative agreement, consults literature and materials, clarifies the research status of domestic administrative agreement, and summarizes the related issues of this topic. By comparing the relevant foreign legal systems, this paper analyzes the existing legal application models and draws inspiration from them, and discusses and analyzes the legal application of domestic administrative agreements in combination with the summarized application of administrative agreements. Due to its particularity, administrative agreements should be applied in a single administrative law or a combination of administrative law and civil law in different situations.
文章引用:潘佳康. 行政协议的法律适用问题研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(2): 1180-1186. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2024.122172

参考文献

[1] 熊勇先. 论行政机关变更、解除权的行使规则——基于司法裁判立场的考察[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(12): 84-94.
[2] 郑少泽. 行政协议中行政相对人的信赖利益保护[J]. 法制与社会, 2020(8): 123-124.
[3] 林劲标. 特许经营权重复许可的效力认定及归责[J]. 人民司法, 2020(8): 95-98.
[4] 杨芳. 行政协议案件的司法审查[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2019.
[5] 王楠. 行政合同基本理论问题探析——基于《德国行政法》比较视角[J]. 新经济, 2019(10): 43-47.
[6] 王敬波. 司法认定无效行政协议的标准[J]. 中国法学, 2019(3): 64-83.
[7] 黄学贤. 行政协议司法审查的理论研究与实践发展[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2018, 33(5): 102-116.
[8] 王逸仙. 论行政协议的司法认定标准[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2018.
[9] 李滕. 行政协议优益权规制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2018.
[10] 杨尚波. 行政协议诉讼举证责任分配研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2018.
[11] 沈福俊. 司法解释中行政协议定义论析——以改造“法定职责范围内”的表述为中心[J]. 法学, 2017(10): 90-99.
[12] 赵东旭. 论行政合同司法救济的完善[J]. 梧州学院学报, 2017, 27(5): 32-35.
[13] 于立深. 行政协议司法判断的核心标准: 公权力的作用[J]. 行政法学研究, 2017(2): 36-53.
[14] Frenzen, D. (1968) The Administrative Contact in the United States. The George Washington Law Review, 37, 270-292.
[15] 梁凤云. 行政协议案件适用合同法的问题[J]. 中国法律评论, 2017(1): 51-55.
[16] 牛佩伟. 审理行政协议案件对民事法律规范的适用问题探讨[J]. 法制与社会, 2016(18): 121-122.
[17] 曾哲, 韩锦霞. 我国行政合同司法审查的实践梳理及完善路径[J]. 江西社会科学, 2016, 36(6): 172-178.
[18] 吴宇龙. 论规范性文件审查的相对独立性[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2016(10): 99-103.
[19] 陈军. 冲击与发展: 契约行政与依法行政关系之检视——透过公私合作视角考察[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(2): 62-68.
[20] 韩津和, 杨西虎. 行政合同的法律适用之模式选择[J]. 法律适用, 2014(3): 85-90.
[21] HeinOnline (2013) Contracts as Public Law at the Intersection of Globalization and Privatization: A Vulnerability and the Human Condition Initiative Workshop. Emory University, Atlanta.
[22] 来利明. 行政法基本原则之法理学分析[J]. 群文天地, 2011(18): 243-244.
[23] 张素华. 论行政不作为侵权的责任承担——以三鹿奶粉事件为中心的研究[J]. 法学评论, 2010, 28(2): 141-146.
[24] 余凌云. 论对行政契约的司法审查[J]. 浙江学刊, 2006(1): 139-144.