论环保NGO在海洋环境公益诉讼中的地位
On the Status of Environmental Protection NGOs in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation
摘要: 在司法实践之中,环保NGO在海洋环境公益诉讼中作为原告起诉频频受阻。这样看来环保NGO似乎被排除在了海洋环境公益诉讼之外,环保NGO在海洋环境公益诉讼中的角色与定位也蒙上了一层阴影。根据现有的海洋环境公益诉讼的程序设计,环保NGO能作为提起海洋环境公益诉讼的原告、环境行政机关和检察院起诉的支持者、海洋生态环境修复的监督者。
Abstract:
In judicial practice, environmental NGOs have been frequently obstructed from suing as plaintiffs in marine environmental public interest litigation. It seems that environmental NGOs have been excluded from marine environmental public interest litigation, and their role and positioning in marine environmental public interest litigation have also been cast a shadow. According to the existing program design of marine environmental public interest litigation, environmental NGOs can serve as plaintiffs, supporters of environmental administrative agencies and procuratorates in filing marine environmental public interest litigation, and supervisors of marine ecological environment restoration.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
解永照, 余晓龙. 海洋环境公益诉讼的制度定位及体系完善[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(1): 168-176.
|
|
[2]
|
张晓萍, 郑鹏. 海洋环境民事公益诉讼适格原告的确定[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 39(1): 122-128.
|
|
[3]
|
陈惠珍, 白续辉. 海洋环境民事公益诉讼中的适格原告确定: 困境及其解决路径[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(2): 162-169.
|
|
[4]
|
马超. 行政公益诉讼诉前磋商机制[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 67-76.
|
|
[5]
|
李京梅, 刘娟. 海洋生态修复: 概念、类型与实施路径选择[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(4): 1241-1251.
|
|
[6]
|
胡静, 崔梦钰. 二元诉讼模式下生态环境修复责任履行的可行性研究[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(6): 13-28.
|