共同海损制度研究
Study of the General Average Regime
摘要: 共同海损制度是针对海上运输事业所特有的风险而建立起来,对海上运输过程中所发生的特有损失进行补救的相应制度。需要同时具备四个方面的要求,才能够成立。共同海损亦可视作为紧急避险的一种特殊形式,二者极为相近。但在实践运用中却产生分歧,对此应当明确一个前提,即共同海损若是由于航行中某方过失所导致,则直接由该方当事人承担事故损失即可。共同海损作为一项海上货物运输中的重要制度,在现今仍能发挥有效作用,应当完善其相应的制度规定和适用范围,加强相关人员培训工作,使其能够具备熟练辨析及运用共同海损制度的能力,解决后续理算缓慢的问题。
Abstract: The general average system is a system established to compensate for losses unique to maritime transportation in response to risks unique to maritime transportation. It is necessary to have four requirements at the same time before it can be established. General average can also be regarded as a special form of emergency avoidance, and the two are very similar. However, there are differences in practice, and a premise should be clarified in this regard, that is, if the general average is caused by the fault of one party during the voyage, it is sufficient for that party to directly bear the accident loss. As an important system in the transportation of goods by sea, general average can still play an effective role today, and its corresponding system provisions and scope of application should be improved, and the training of relevant personnel should be strengthened, so that they can have the ability to skillfully analyze and use the general average system, and solve the problem of slow follow-up adjustment.
文章引用:刘帅杰. 共同海损制度研究[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(2): 1045-1050. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.102144

参考文献

[1] 司玉琢, 主编. 海商法[M]. 第四版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018.
[2] 谭瑞. 海洋运输中单独海损的判定与赔偿[J]. 现代经济信息, 2014(14): 346-347.
[3] 王依桐. 论共同海损的构成要件[J]. 辽宁经济, 2020(2): 48-50.
[4] 张永坚. 共同海损的成立基础[J]. 地方立法研究, 2018, 3(5): 87-94.
[5] 司玉琢, 吴煦. 论雇佣救助费用和船舶优先权、共同海损之间的关系[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(1): 3-13.
[6] 高秋颖. 海商法中共同海损法律制度研究[J]. 世界航运, 2014, 37(11): 54-57.
[7] 陈刚, 张溪娟. 紧急避险视野下的共同海损制度研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 19(6): 1-11
[8] 徐燕东. 论船方过失对共同海损分摊的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2007.
[9] 荆珍. 坚持完善我国的共同海损制度[J]. 理论探索, 2005(1): 107-108.
[10] 初北平. 海上保险中的共同海损[J]. 中国船检, 2016(5): 22-26.