论中国“双碳”目标的司法保障
Discussion on Judicial Safeguards for China’s “Dual Carbon” Goal
摘要: 中国“双碳”目标的实现任重而道远,仅凭现有的围绕“双碳”目标的政策体系是远远不够的,仍需要借助司法力量来助推“双碳”目标。目前面向气候变化领域以及涉碳领域的司法保障尚有空缺和不足,具体表现为司法能动与预防的价值理念不足,以及面向气候变化及涉碳领域的专门性立法存在空白。应通过落实司法能动理念、健全司法预防价值及推进相关领域立法,完善面向“双碳”目标的法治保障,推动“双碳”目标在法治的轨道上行稳致远。
Abstract: China has a long way to go to achieve the “dual carbon” goal. The existing policy system around the “dual carbon” goal is far from enough. It is still necessary to rely on the judicial power to promote the “double carbon” goal. At present, there are still gaps and deficiencies in judicial safeguards in the field of climate change and carbon-related fields. Specifically, there is a lack of judicial initiative and the value concept of prevention, as well as a gap in specific legislation for climate change and carbon-related fields. It is necessary to improve the legal guarantee for the “dual carbon” goal by implementing the concept of judicial initiative, improving the value of judicial prevention, and promoting legislation in relevant fields, so as to promote the steady and far-reaching development of the “dual carbon” goal on the track of the rule of law.
文章引用:齐小娜. 论中国“双碳”目标的司法保障[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(2): 1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.102148

参考文献

[1] 于文轩, 胡泽弘. “双碳”目标下的法律政策协同与法制因应——基于法政策学的视角[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2022, 32(4): 57-65.
[2] 李丽华. “双碳”目标下我国气候变化的司法治理[J]. 时代报告, 2022(8): 4-6.
[3] 中国环境网. 深圳生态环境: 首发!深圳发布《夜间光环境区域限值》标准[EB/OL].
https://www.cenews.com.cn/media-article.html?aid=16297&mediaID=156, 2024-01-21.
[4] 苏力. 关于能动司法与大调解[J]. 中国法学, 2010(1): 5-16.
[5] 邓禾, 李旭东. 论实现碳达峰、碳中和的司法保障[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 37-49.
[6] 周珂. 适度能动司法推进双碳达标——基于实然与应然研究[J]. 政法论丛, 2021(4): 13-22.
[7] 吕忠梅. “生态环境损害赔偿”的法律辨析[J]. 法学论坛, 2017, 32(3): 5-13.
[8] 刘志仁. 论“双碳”背景下中国碳排放管理的法治化路径[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2022, 40(3): 94-104.
[9] 刘超. “双碳”目标下碳汇交易司法机制创新的逻辑与进路[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2023(2): 98-110.
[10] 薛莉萍, 陈静. 环境公益诉讼风险预防理念提倡[J]. 中国检察官, 2022(19): 61-64.
[11] 李丹. 国家治理体系中预防性环境公益诉讼的规范构造[J]. 法学评论, 2023, 41(2): 177-186.