领导底线心智对员工工作绩效的影响：基于社会认知理论的视角
The Influence of the Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality on Employee Job Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.142103, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 车 丹：西南大学心理学部，重庆；刘梦佳：泸州市职业技术学校语文教研组，四川 泸州
关键词: 领导底线心智；道德推脱；领导煽动辱虐管理；回报预期；Bottom-Line Mentality； Moral Disengagement； Instigated Abusive Supervision； Reward Expectancy
摘要: 领导底线心智对员工及其组织带来的负面影响受到了学者的广泛关注，然而，针对领导底线心智对员工工作绩效的影响机制探讨较为有限，并且现有研究结论未达成一致。有鉴于此，本文从社会认知理论的三元互动视角出发，构建了一个两阶段有调节的中介作用模型，试图解释和厘清领导底线心智对下属工作绩效的影响机制及边界条件。本文采用多水平结构方程建模技术，通过对两个独立的两时间点收集的主管–员工配对样本进行分析，结果表明：1) 领导底线心智会激发员工的道德推脱；2) 领导辱虐管理行为在领导底线心智激发员工道德推脱的过程起到了显著的正向调节作用；3) 在员工的回报预期较低的情形下，员工的道德推脱与其工作绩效呈负相关；4) 当且仅当领导煽动辱虐管理水平较高且员工回报预期水平较低时，领导底线心智通过员工道德推脱对员工工作绩效产生负向的间接影响较为显著。本文为深化领导底线心智的研究和管理实践提供了重要参考。
Abstract: The detrimental effects of leader Bottom-line mentality (BLM) on employees and organizations have received extensive attention from scholars. However, limited research has explored the mecha-nisms through which leader BLM influences employee job performance, and existing conclusions remain inconclusive. In light of this, this paper adopts a three-element interactive perspective from social cognitive theory, constructing a two-stage moderated mediation model to elucidate and clari-fy the mechanisms and boundary conditions of the impact of leader bottom-line mentality on sub-ordinates’ job performance. Employing multi-level structural equation modeling techniques and analyzing supervisor-subordinate dyadic samples collected at two independent time points, the re-sults indicate that: 1) Leader bottom-line mentality triggers employees’ moral disengagement; 2) Abusive supervisory behavior significantly positively moderates the process through which leader bottom-line mentality stimulates employees’ moral disengagement; 3) In situations where em-ployees have lower expectations of rewards, moral disengagement is negatively correlated with job performance; 4) Leader bottom-line mentality exerts a significantly negative indirect impact on employee job performance through employees’ moral disengagement only when both leader insti-gation of abusive management and low employee expectations of rewards are present. This study contributes valuable insights to the deepening of leader bottom-line mentality research and man-agement practices.
文章引用：车丹, 刘梦佳 (2024). 领导底线心智对员工工作绩效的影响：基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学进展, 14(2), 819-827. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.142103

参考文献

[1] 陈默, 梁建(2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学报, 49(1), 94-105.
[2] 崔倩(2022). 辱虐管理消极效应的缓冲机制: 研究现状与未来展望. 东北财经大学学报, (4), 31-40.
[3] 樊景立, 郑伯埙(1997). 华人自评式绩效考核中的自谦偏差: 题意, 谦虚价值及自尊之影响. 中华心理学刊, 39(2), 103-118.
[4] 刘东, 张震, 汪默(2018). 单层与多层被调节的中介和被中介的调节: 理论构建与模型检验(高中华 译). 见 陈晓萍, 沈伟(编), 组织与管理研究的实证方法(第3版, pp. 663-693). 北京大学出版社.
[5] Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[6] Bandura, A. (2002a). Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119.[CrossRef] 
[7] Bandura, A. (2002b). Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context. Applied Psychology, 51, 269-290.[CrossRef] 
[8] Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.[CrossRef] 
[9] Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007). Leader-Member Exchange and Member Performance: A New Look at Individual-Level Negative Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Team-Level Empowerment Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 202-212.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.[CrossRef] 
[11] Farasat, M., & Azam, A. (2020). Supervisor Bottom-Line Men-tality and Subordinates’ Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. Personnel Review, 51, 353-376.[CrossRef] 
[12] Friedman, M. (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to In-crease Its Profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance (pp. 173-178). Springer.[CrossRef] 
[13] Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Eissa, G. (2012). Bot-tom-Line Mentality as an Antecedent of Social Undermining and the Moderating Roles of Core Self-Evaluations and Con-scientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 343-359.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Issues in Multilevel Research: Theory Development, Measurement, and Analysis. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 247-274). Blackwell.[CrossRef] 
[15] Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some Differences Make a Difference: Individual Dissimilarity and Group Heterogeneity as Corre-lates of Recruitment, Promotions, and Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.[CrossRef] 
[16] Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad Apples, Bad Cases, and Bad Barrels: Meta-Analytic Evidence about Sources of Unethical Decisions at Work. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 95, 1-31.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lian, H., Huai, M., Farh, J. L., Huang, J. C., Lee, C., & Chao, M. M. (2022). Leader Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Employee Unethical Conduct: Social Learning of Moral Disengagement as a Behavioral Principle. Journal of Management, 48, 350-379.
[18] Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Johnson, R. E., Liu, W., & Song, Z. (2018). Cleansing My Abuse: A Reparative Response Model of Perpetrating Abusive Supervisor Behavior. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 103, 1039-1056.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive Supervision and Work-place Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159-1168.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Klebe Treviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why Employees Do Bad Things: Moral Disengagement and Unethical Organizational Behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65, 1-48.[CrossRef] 
[21] Valentine, S., Hollingworth, D., & Eidsness, B. (2014). Eth-ics-Related Selection and Reduced Ethical Conflict as Drivers of Positive Work Attitudes: Delivering on Employees’ Expec-tations for an Ethical Workplace. Personnel Review, 43, 692-716.[CrossRef] 
[22] Wolfe, D. M. (1988). Is There Integrity in the Bottom Line: Managing Obstacles to Executive Integrity. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), Executive Integrity: The Search for High Human Values in Organiza-tional Life (pp. 140-171). Jossey-Bass.
[23] Zeng, W., Zhou, Y., & Shen, Z. (2018). Dealing with an Abusive Boss in China: The Moderating Effect of Promotion Focus on Reward Expectancy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Interna-tional Journal of Conflict Management, 29, 500-518.[CrossRef]