内外向人格特质与容器隐喻的关系探究
Exploration of the Relationship between Introverted and Extroverted Personality Traits and Container Metaphor
摘要: 隐喻是具身认知领域研究的重要课题之一，其中容器隐喻是隐喻概念中重要的研究领域之一。通过梳理内外向人格特质与容器隐喻的相关研究，发现仅局限于道德、亲属关系等概念上探讨容器隐喻是如何表征抽象概念的，而内外向人格特质概念在语义上便是通过容器内与外的形式进行表征的，但尚未有相关研究对其进行探讨。因此，在认知视角下探讨容器隐喻与内外向人格特质之间是否存在隐喻联结，且是否存在映射关系具有重要意义。
Abstract: Metaphor is one of the important research topics in the field of embodied cognition, among which container metaphor is one of the important research areas in the concept of metaphor. By reviewing the research on the relationship between introverted and extroverted personality traits and con-tainer metaphors, it was found that the exploration of container metaphors is limited to concepts such as morality and kinship relationships, while the concept of introverted and extroverted per-sonality traits is semantically expressed in the form of containers both inside and outside. However, no relevant research has explored this topic. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore whether there is a metaphorical connection and mapping relationship between container metaphor and in-troverted and extroverted personality traits from a cognitive perspective.
文章引用：杨帆, 史宏森, 于璐 (2024). 内外向人格特质与容器隐喻的关系探究. 心理学进展, 14(2), 828-835. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.142104

参考文献

[1] 曹瑛(2013). 汉语容器隐喻与情感概念. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 31(4), 77-80.
[2] 丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊(2017). 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 666-674.
[3] 丁汝楠(2018). 道德概念的重量隐喻研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江大学.
[4] 郭人豪(2021). 容器隐喻的发展与中华民族共同体意识. 中国民族教育, (2), 24-25.[CrossRef] 
[5] 李思承(2021). 容器隐喻对大学生中华民族共同体联想词效价表征的影响. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学.
[6] 李瑛(2004). 容器图式和容器隐喻. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 25(5), 448-451.
[7] 刘敏, 杜巧荣, 王禹辰, 等(2020). 抑郁症患者人格、应对方式和抑郁严重程度的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 8(6), 801-805.
[8] 鲁忠义, 郭少鹏, 蒋泽亮(2017). 道德概念大小隐喻的心理现实性及映射关系. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (2), 70-78.
[9] 孟乐, 叶灿, 王佳佳, 张积家(2022). 内藏班高中生对国内外民族的容器隐喻、群际态度和助人倾向. 心理学报, 54(11), 1366-1380.
[10] 谭健烽, 禹玉兰, 杨杰霖, 等(2013). 内外向人格倾向者沙盘作品特征比较. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(3), 414-416+413.
[11] 汤江南, 谢蕾蕾, 周玮(2010). 高职生内外向人格特征对自我和谐及心理健康的影响. 宜春学院学报, 32(11), 156-157+191.
[12] 唐佩佩, 叶浩生, 杜建政(2015). 权力概念与空间大小: 具身隐喻的视角. 心理学报, 47(4), 514-521.
[13] 汪新筱, 江珊, 张积家(2018). 空间语言标记影响亲属关系的容器隐喻. 心理学报, 50(9), 953-964.
[14] 王丛兴, 杨玉琴, 熊猛, 叶一舵(2021). 特征整合与加工深度对道德概念容器隐喻联结的影响. 心理学报, 53(2), 139-154.
[15] 王国锋, 彭小虎(2011). 内外向人格特质的关联性负变电位研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 753-755.
[16] 王继瑛, 叶浩生, 苏得权(2018). 身体动作与语义加工: 具身隐喻的视角. 心理学探新, 38(1), 15-19.
[17] 夏金凤(2009). 冷暖色调与内外向人格特质的内隐研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[18] 徐云轩, 吴大兴, 徐远超, 等(2011). 内外向与神经质在大学生乐观-悲观倾向与抑郁关系的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(1), 116-118.
[19] 许丹阳, 杨智辉(2017). 大学生社会支持在内外向与孤独间的中介作用研究. 中国全科医学, 20(28), 3558-3562.
[20] 杨惠兰, 何先友, 赵雪汝, 等(2015). 权力的概念隐喻表征: 来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据. 心理学报, 47(7), 939-949.
[21] 叶浩生(2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
[22] 叶浩生(2017). 具身认知——原理与应用. 商务印书馆.
[23] 易洁美, 张湘一, 刘邦春, 等(2012). 社会认知: 具身的视角. 教师, (29), 126-128.
[24] 殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生(2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 220-234.
[25] 张梦瑶(2016). 时间压力、内外向和神经质人格类型对风险决策及框架效应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学.
[26] 张姝(2021). 社会地位概念的重量隐喻研究. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学.
[27] 赵秀杰, 曹忠芹(2008). 论容器隐喻的功能及映射. 西昌学院学报(社会科学版), 20(2), 6-8+12.
[28] 周玉庭(2023). 知觉加工深度对大学生同辈关系容器隐喻联结的影响. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学.
[29] 周志民, 张江乐, 熊义萍(2014). 内外倾人格特质如何影响在线品牌社群中的知识分享行为——网络中心性与互惠规范的中介作用. 南开管理评论, 17(3), 19-29.
[30] Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Holt.
[31] Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Bio-logical Dimensions of Personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 244-276). The Guilford Press.
[32] Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). Personality Structure and Measurement (Psychology Revivals). Routledge.
[33] Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders’ Power are Interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30-44.[CrossRef] 
[34] Jami, A. (2019). Having Control over and above Situations: The In-fluence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking. Journal of Marketing Research, 56, 230-244.[CrossRef] 
[35] Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.[CrossRef] 
[36] Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an Embodiment of Importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Jung, C. G. (1940). The Integration of Personality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13, 568.[CrossRef] 
[38] Kirton, M. J., & Ciantis, S. D. (1986). Cognitive Style and Personality: The Kirton Adaption-Innovation and Cattell’s Sixteen Personality Factor Inventories. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 141-146.[CrossRef] 
[39] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Uni-versity of Chicago.
[40] Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A. et al. (2000). Cross-Cultural Evidence for the Fundamental Features of Extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452-468.[CrossRef] 
[41] Ludlow, R. (1991). Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure by Eva Kittay. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 324-330.[CrossRef] 
[42] McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Pilar, G. D., et al. (1998). Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Per-sonality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171-188.[CrossRef] 
[43] Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the Sunny Side Is Up: Associations between Affect and Vertical Position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Montoro, P. R., Contreras, M. J., Elosúa, M. R., & Marmole-jo-Ramos, F. (2015). Cross-Modal Metaphorical Map of Spoken Emotion Words onto Vertical Space. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 6, Article 1205.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your Highness: Ver-tical Positions as Perceptual Symbols of Power. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89, 1-21.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Smith, L., & Gasser M. (2005). The Development of Embodied Cogni-tion: Six Lessons from Babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13-29.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The Scaffolded Mind: Higher Mental Processes Are Grounded in Early Experience of the Physical World. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1257-1267.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Zanolie, K., Dantzig, S. V., Boot, I. et al. (2011). Mighty Metaphors: Behavioral and ERP Evidence That Power Shifts Attention on a Vertical Dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78, 50-58.[CrossRef] [PubMed]