基于Fiducial推断的Kriging模型选择
Model Selection of Kriging Model Based on Fiducial Inference
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2024.132066, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 张淑芹, 李新民:青岛大学数学与统计学院,山东 青岛;李 涵:乌鲁木齐八一中学,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: Kriging模型Fiducial推断模型选择Kriging Model Fiducial Inference Model Selection
摘要: 计算机试验异军突起,并因其经济性而越来越普遍地取代物理实验。Kriging模型作为计算机试验的元模型之一,因其使用简单、灵活被广泛地应用于各大领域。本文给出了基于Fiducial推断的Kriging模型选择方法,并与Lasso和Elastic Net惩罚下的选择方法相比较。数值模拟和实例分析表明Elastic Net惩罚下的选择方法优于Lasso,基于Fiducial推断的模型选择方法相较于Lasso和Elastic Net具有更高的拟合准确性和预测精度。
Abstract: Computer experiments are becoming increasingly popular and surrogate for physical experiments because of their economy. Kriging model, as one of the meta models of computer experiments, is widely used in various fields because of its simplicity and flexibility. This paper studies a model se-lection method based on Fiducial inference for Kriging model, and compares with the selection methods under Lasso and Elastic Net penalties. Numerical simulation and case analysis show that the selection method based on Elastic Net penalty is superior to Lasso, and the model selection method based on Fiducial inference has higher fitting accuracy and prediction accuracy compared to Lasso and Elastic Net.
文章引用:张淑芹, 李涵, 李新民. 基于Fiducial推断的Kriging模型选择[J]. 应用数学进展, 2024, 13(2): 684-691. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2024.132066

参考文献

[1] Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P. (1989) Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science, 4, 409-423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Welch, W.J., Buck, R.J. and Sacks, J. (1992) Screening, Predicting, and Computer Experiments. Technometrics, 34, 15-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Li, R. and Sudjianto, A. (2005) Analysis of Computer Experiments Using Penalized Likelihood in Gaussian Kriging Models. Technometrics, 47, 111-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Linkletter, C., Bingham, D. and Hengartner, N. (2006) Varia-ble Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments. Technometrics, 48, 478-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Zhang, C.H. (2010) Nearly Unbiased Variable Selection under Minimax Concave Penalty. The Annals of Statistics, 38, 894-942. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25662264 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hung, Y. (2011) Penalized Blind Kriging in Computer Experiments. Sta-tistica Sinica, 21, 1171-1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Santner, T.J., Williams, B.J. and Notz, W.I. (2003) The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer, New York. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Fisher, R.A. (1922) On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 222, 309-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Hannig, J., Iyer, H., Lai, R.C.S., et al. (2016) Generalized Fiducial Inference: A Review and New Results. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 1346-1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hannig, J. and Lee, T.C.M. (2009) Generalized Fiducial In-ference for Wavelet Regression. Biometrika, 96, 847-860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 李涵, 赵建昕, 王晓, 李新民. 计算机试验下Kriging模型选择的比较[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(3): 694-700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 赵勇超, 梁华, 李新民. 高维回归模型的Fiducial变量选择[J]. 中国科学: 数学, 2023, 53(6): 839-858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Worley, B.A. (1987) Deterministic Uncertainty Analysis. Oak Ridge National Lab, TN, USA.
[14] Huang, H., Lin, D.K.J., Liu, M.Q. and Zhang, Q. (2019) Variable Selection for Kriging in Computer Experiments. Journal of Quality Technology, 52, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef