电商代运营公司为网店虚造交易记录行为定性研究
A Qualitative Study on the Behavior of Fake Transaction Records for Online Shops
摘要: 随着电子商务领域的快速发展,电商代运营行业应运而生,其为网店虚造交易记录行为逐渐发展成为一种具有产业性的新型违法行为,该行为以不正当的方式提高网店的销量、好评度以及信誉度,不仅让传统的诚信经营理念受到冲击,也阻碍了电商的持续良性发展,同时还可能涉及违法犯罪。电子商务交易虽然与传统交易有所差别,但二者本质上是一致的,对于电商代运营公司为网店虚造交易记录的行为适用非法经营罪,但在认定后的具体规制方式上可以根据罪量选择行政手段或刑法手段进行规制。
Abstract:
With the rapid development of e-commerce, the e-commerce agent operation industry came into being. The act of falsification of transaction records for online stores has gradually developed into a new type of industrial illegal behavior, which improperly improves the sales, praise and reputation of online stores, which not only shocks the traditional business philosophy of integrity, but also hinders the sustainable and healthy development of e-commerce. It may also involve criminal offences. Although e-commerce transactions are different from traditional transactions, they are essentially the same. The crime of illegal business is applicable to the act of the e-commerce agent operating company falsifying transaction records for the online shop. However, the specific regulation methods after identification can be regulated by administrative means or criminal means according to the amount of the crime.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
高艳东. 信息时代非法经营罪的重生——组织刷单案评析[J]. 中国法律评论, 2018(2): 146-153.
|
|
[2]
|
方镇飞. 网络刷单炒信行为的法律定性[J]. 人民司法, 2022(14): 104-106.
|
|
[3]
|
王华伟. 刷单炒信的刑法适用与解释理念[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2018, 6(6): 95-111.
|
|
[4]
|
叶良芳. 刷单炒信行为的规范分析及其治理路径[J]. 法学, 2018(3): 177-191.
|
|
[5]
|
武良军. 非法经营罪堵截条款之异化[J]. 环球法律评论, 2014(5): 33-48.
|
|
[6]
|
周光权. 刑法软性解释的限制与增设妨害业务罪[J]. 中外法学, 2019, 31(4): 16.
|
|
[7]
|
国家知识产权网. 参见《最高人民法院发布2021年中国法院10大知识产权案件和50件典型知识产权案例》[EB/OL]. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2022/4/22/art_2863_174920.html, 2024-01-15.
|