基于CiteSpace的国内外企业绩效研究比较分析
Comparative Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Enterprise Performance Research Based on CiteSpace
DOI: 10.12677/ECL.2024.131050, PDF,   
作者: 常 昕:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 企业绩效CiteSpace文献计量可视化知识图谱Business Performance CiteSpace Bibliometrics Visualization Knowledge Graph
摘要: 分别对于web of science与中国知网SSCI与CSSCI数据库内的国内外关于企业绩效研究的文献,对 2000~2013年国内外企业绩效研究运用CiteSpace进行可视化分析,并从研究方法、研究内容等方面对国内外研究的异同点进行分析。研究表明:对于企业绩效的研究,文献数量与发展速度上,国内外关于企业绩效研究的文献总体上均是呈现逐年递增的趋势,且国外在研究数量与增速方面相对来说是高于国内的;研究内容上,国内企业绩效研究更注重企业绩效与社会责任、企业规模、产权性质与政府关联等主题;国外则更关注供应链及发展中国家(中国)、社会责任履行、战略与可持续发展等主题;社会责任与环境保护等方面是国内外在企业绩效研究方面共同关注的热点主题。分析得出:国内对企业绩效的研究应该在实证研究的基础上,积极探索出具有中国特色的企业绩效研究道路,努力开拓多学科、全方面的绩效研究理论。
Abstract: Based on the domestic and foreign literature on enterprise performance research in the SSCI and CSSCI databases of web of science and CNKI respectively, this paper visually analyzes domestic and foreign enterprise performance research from 2000 to 2013 by using CiteSpace. The similarities and differences of domestic and foreign researches are analyzed from the aspects of research methods and contents. The results show that: In terms of the number and development speed of the research on enterprise performance, the literature on enterprise performance at home and abroad generally shows an increasing trend year by year, and the research quantity and growth rate in foreign countries are relatively higher than that in China. In terms of research content, domestic enterprise performance research pays more attention to the themes of enterprise performance and social responsibility, enterprise scale, property right nature and government correlation. Foreign countries pay more attention to supply chain and developing countries (China), social responsibility implementation, strategy and sustainable development; Social responsibility and environmental protection are hot topics in corporate performance research at home and abroad. It is concluded that the domestic research on enterprise performance should actively explore the way of enterprise performance research with Chinese characteristics on the basis of empirical research, and strive to develop a multi-disciplinary and all-round performance research theory.
文章引用:常昕. 基于CiteSpace的国内外企业绩效研究比较分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(1): 411-421. https://doi.org/10.12677/ECL.2024.131050

参考文献

[1] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[2] 谢学锋, 邓春英. 基于CiteSpace的企业绩效管理研究热点及趋势分析[J]. 商场现代化, 2022(18): 70-73.
[3] 张晶. 企业研发支出对企业绩效的影响研究文献综述[J]. 吉林省经济管理干部学院学报, 2016, 30(1): 44-46.
[4] 张继德, 刘洁, 黄思良, 等. 数字化转型与企业绩效: 综述和展望[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(14): 3-9, 44.
[5] 王飞, 吕莎莎. 绿色战略与企业绩效关系研究评述[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2015, 40(4): 138-139.
[6] 李高泰, 王尔大. 企业社会责任对企业绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2015, 29(9): 59-62.
[7] Maldonado-Erazo, C.P., Alvarez-García, J., de la Cruz del Río-Rama, M. and Correa-Quezada, R. (2020) Corporate Social Responsibility and Performance in SMEs: Scientific Coverage. Sustainability, 12, Article 2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 雷方超. 探究开放式创新策略与企业绩效之间的关系[J]. 中小企业管理与科技(上旬刊), 2020(28): 154-155.
[9] Wang, S., Ahmad, F., Li, Y., et al. (2022) The Impact of Industrial Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Compa-nies. Sustainability, 14, Article 4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 柏培文. 社会资本、公司治理与企业绩效[J]. 社会科学战线, 2018(11): 78-90.
[11] Ngoc, H.T. and Nguyen, T.T.H. (2021) Factors Impacting on Social and Corporate Governance and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Vietnamese Enterprises. Journal of Asian Finance, Econom-ics and Business, 8, 41-49.
[12] 张文锋, 谷方杰, 刘磊. 国有企业高管薪酬激励对企业绩效的影响效应研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2021(10): 122-129.
[13] 许佩佩. 研发投入与企业绩效的相关性研究——基于创业板制造企业数据的检验[J]. 创新科技, 2016(12): 26-28.
[14] Yang, Y., Zheng, Y., Xie, G. and Tian, Y. (2022) The Influence Mechanism of Strategic Partnership on Enterprise Performance: Exploring the Chain Mediating Role of Information Sharing and Supply Chain Flexibility. Sustainability, 14, Article 4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Cao, J., Wu, C., Tetteh, S., et al. (2021) Symmetric Modeling of Diversi-fication Strategy and Organizational Structure on Financial Performance: Evidence from China. Symmetry, 13, Article 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 万里霜. 上市公司股权激励、代理成本与企业绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 预测, 2021, 40(2): 76-82.
[17] 陈文强, 贾生华. 股权激励、代理成本与企业绩效——基于双重委托代理问题的分析框架[J]. 当代经济科学, 2015, 37(2): 106-113, 128.
[18] Lu, W., Chau, K.W., Wang, H. and Pan, W. (2014) A Decade’s Debate on the Nexus between Corporate Social and Corporate Financial Performance: A Critical Re-view of Empirical Studies 2002-2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 张雪, 韦鸿. 企业社会责任、技术创新与企业绩效[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(5): 157-161.
[20] Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Valdez-Juárez, L.E. and Castuera-Díaz, A.M. (2019) Cor-porate Social Responsibility as an Antecedent of Innovation, Reputation, Performance, and Competitive Success: A Mul-tiple Mediation Analysis. Sustainability, 11, Article 5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 陈旭, 江瑶, 熊焰. 数字化转型对企业绩效的影响机制和路径研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2023(2): 112-120.