论国际商事仲裁虚拟化对当事人意思自治的冲击
The Impact of Virtual Hearings in International Commercial Arbitration on the Party Autonomy Doctrine
摘要: 后疫情时代,以虚拟听证为代表的虚拟现实技术在国际商事仲裁领域的广泛引用,对原本以当事人意思自治主义为核心的国际商事仲裁传统制度造成了冲击,形成了仲裁机构权力相对扩大的现象。一方面,其体现为在当事人的意思自治与仲裁庭权力发生分歧,并诉诸法院解决纠纷之时,法院在事实上驳回了当事人的诉请、支持了仲裁庭的诉求;另一方面,则体现为虚拟听证作为国际商事仲裁领域提高仲裁效率的关键切入点,在一定程度上和当事人追求的公平之间出现碰撞。因此,为了缓解仲裁当事人和仲裁机构的矛盾、平衡公平和效率的冲突,应当从实质上规范仲裁机构的行为、从形式上增加仲裁机构的公信力,在制度层面和技术层面对仲裁庭权力进行有效制约。
Abstract: In the post-epidemic era, the extensive use of virtual reality technology in the field of international commercial arbitration, represented by virtual hearings, has impacted the traditional system of international commercial arbitration centered on party autonomy, resulting in the relative expansion of the power of arbitral institutions. On the one hand, it is reflected in the party’s autonomy and arbitral tribunal power disagreement, and resort to the court to resolve disputes, the court in fact rejected the party’s claim, support the arbitral tribunal’s claim; on the other hand, it is reflected in the virtual hearing as the international commercial arbitration field to improve the efficiency of arbitration key entry point, to a certain extent, and the parties to the pursuit of fairness of the collision between. Therefore, in order to alleviate the contradiction between the parties to arbitration and the arbitration institution, and to balance the conflict between fairness and efficiency, it is necessary to regulate the behavior of the arbitration institution in terms of substance, to increase the credibility of the arbitration institution in terms of form, and to impose effective constraints on the power of the arbitration tribunal at the institutional level and at the technical level.
文章引用:李宁悦. 论国际商事仲裁虚拟化对当事人意思自治的冲击[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(2): 1138-1146. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.102156

参考文献

[1] 冯硕. 大变局时代的国际仲裁——2021年《国际仲裁调查报告》述评[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2021(4): 142-160.
[2] Bateson, D. (2020) Virtual Arbitration: The Impact of COVID-19. Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 9, 159-161.
[3] Abraham, C. (2001) Cyber Arbitration. In: Arbitration (2001-2002), The Chartered Institute of Arbitra-tors Malaysia Branch, Kuala Lumpur, p. 71.
[4] Klang, M. (1998) Improving Arbitration with Information Technology. Proceedings of the 21th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Saeby, Denmark, 8-11 August 1998.
[5] 卢云华, 沈四宝, Lawless Naill. 在线仲裁研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008: 30.
[6] Bonnet, V., Boudaoud, K., Gagnebin, M., Harms, J. and Schultz, T. (2004) Online Dispute Resolution Systems as Web Services. ICFAI Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 3.
[7] Arsic, J. (1997) International Commercial Arbitration on the Internet-has the Future Come Too Early? Journal of International Arbitration, 14, 209-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王彦志, 范冰仪. 意思自治原则在国际商事法庭中的运用[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 116-124+133.
[9] [英]施米托夫. 国际贸易法文选[M]. 赵秀文, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1993: 674.
[10] 孙建丽. 国际商事仲裁中当事人意思自治问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2020: 22.
[11] Rovine, A.W. (2014) Contemporary Is Sues International Arbitration and Mediation. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, 2-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 林一. 国际商事仲裁中的意思自治原则——基于现代商业社会的考察[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018: 65.
[13] 李贤森. 国际商事仲裁意思自治的保障与限制问题——兼评《仲裁法》的修改[J]. 法学, 2022(4): 179-192.
[14] 杜焕芳, 李贤森. 国际商事仲裁当事人程序自治边界冲突与平衡[J]. 法学评论, 2020, 38(2): 167-174.
[15] Scherer, M. (2020) Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Ana-lytical Framework. Journal of International Arbitration, 38, 407-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会, 主编. 中国国际商事仲裁年度报告[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 83.
[17] 刘晓红. 国际商事仲裁协议的法理与实证[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005: 338.
[18] 刘晓红, 冯硕. 改革开放40年来中国涉外仲裁法律制度发展的历程、理念与方向[J]. 国际法研究, 2019(6): 103-126.
[19] 刘晓红, 冯硕. 论国际商事仲裁中机构管理权与意思自治的冲突与协调[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2018, 33(5): 1-13.
[20] 严红. 国际商事仲裁软法探究[J]. 社会科学战线, 2016(10): 200-207.
[21] 沈四宝, 蒋琪. 浅论仲裁员的自由裁量权[J]. 河北法学, 2017, 35(3): 15-24.
[22] 杨立民. 中国涉外法律服务准入机制的争议、现状与比较[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2018, 25(3): 15-18.
[23] 王晓. 民事诉权保障论纲[J]. 法学论坛, 2016(6): 58-67.
[24] 田雨酥. 人工智能影响下的国际商事仲裁[J]. 仲裁与法律, 2022(1): 35-47.