大学生语体转换与身份研究
A Study on the Stylistic Transformation and Identity of College Students
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2024.122157, PDF,   
作者: 李清泉：上海大学文学院，上海
关键词: 语言身份；语体转换；大学生；Language Identity； Style Conversion； College Student
摘要: 本文阐释语言身份认同概念，梳理大学生多重身份认同种类，通过会话分析的方法分析案例，探讨大学生语体转换与身份认同状况。大学生的多重身份包括三个层面：师生关系中的教师–学生身份，学生关系中的自主–学生身份，共享网络多媒体背景的轻共同体身份，前者对应正式、权威的语体，后两者对应自主、随意的语体。研究结果显示，身份认同是一个不断流动的概念，语体转换可以构建多重的、流动的身份认同；身份认同构建的过程是说话人与受话人之间的呼应过程，说话人通过语体转换发出身份认同的信号，受话人则也转换语体回应该信号。
Abstract: This paper explains the concept of linguistic identity, sorts out the multiple types of college students’ identities, analyzes cases through the method of conversation analysis, and discusses the situation of college students’ stylistic transformation and identity. The multiple identities of college students include three levels: The teacher-student identity in the teacher-student relationship, the autonomous-student identity in the student-student relationship, and the light community identity in the shared network multimedia background. The former corresponds to the formal and authoritative style, while the latter two correspond to the autonomous and casual style. The results show that identity is a constantly flowing concept, and stylistic transformation can construct multiple, fluid identities. The process of identity construction is an echo process between the speaker and the receiver. The speaker sends out the signal of identity through stylistic conversion, and the receiver also converts the stylistic response signal.
文章引用：李清泉. 大学生语体转换与身份研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2024, 12(2): 1178-1186. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2024.122157

参考文献

[1] 祝畹瑾. 新编社会语言学概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.
[2] 李熙宗. 关于语体的定义问题[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2005(3): 176-186+196.
[3] 刘运同. 会话分析学派的研究方法及理论基础[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2002(4): 111-117.
[4] 董洁. “城市新移民”的语言身份认同[J]. 语言战略研究, 2016, 1(1): 50-55.
[5] Eckert, P. (1989) Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identities in the High School. Teachers College Press, New York.
[6] Tabouret, K.A. (1997) Language and Identity. In: Coulmas, F., Ed., The Handbook of Sociolin-guistics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 315-326.
[7] Coupland, N., Coupland, J. and Giles, H. (1989) Telling Age in Later Life: Identity and Face Implications. Text, 9, 129-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Jaffe, A. (2009) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Stance. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Goodwin, M.H. and Alim, H.S. (2010) “What-ever (Neck Roll, Eye Roll, Teeth Suck)”: The Situated Coproduction of Social Categories and Identities through Stance Taking and Transmodal Stylization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20, 179-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 丁金国. 语体风格的发生学研究[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 16(1): 114-119.
[11] 丁金国. 语体风格研究中的核心概念[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 21(1): 115-120.
[12] 丁金国. 语体意识与语言运用[J]. 修辞学习, 2005(3): 11-18.
[13] 李经伟. 语体转换与角色定位[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2003, 26(1): 6-10.
[14] 董洁, 王硕, 小幡佳菜绘, 刘晴. 语言与新媒体研究的视角、方法和趋势[J]. 语言战略研究, 2023, 8(1): 39-49.
[15] Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. CUP, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Blommaert, J. and Dong, J. (2010) Ethno-graphic Fieldwork: A Beginner’s Guide. Multilingual Matters, Bristol. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 袁晖, 李熙宗. 汉语语体概论[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.
[18] Have, P. (1990) Methodological Issues in Conversation Analysis. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, No. 27, 23-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.