|
[1]
|
甘烨彤, 方圣杰, 韩尚锋, 王秀娟, 刘燊, 杨亚平, 张林(2021). 社会层级的内隐刻板印象: 权力与地位的不同作用. 心理科学, 44(1), 118-125.[CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
管健, 程婕婷(2011). 刻板印象内容模型的确认、测量及卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(2), 184-188.
|
|
[3]
|
姜新华, 杨峰, 李秀丽, 王美芳(2016). 8-13岁儿童关于能力与热情的内隐性别刻板印象. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 613-617.[CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
马芳, 梁宁建(2006). 内隐数学-性别刻板印象的SEB研究. 心理科学, 29(5), 1116-1118.[CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
马芳, 梁宁建(2008). 数学性别刻板印象的内隐联想测验研究. 心理科学, 31(1), 35-39.[CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
王沛(1999). 刻板印象的社会认知研究述论. 心理科学, 22(4), 342-345.[CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
韦庆旺, 李木子, 陈晓晨(2018). 社会阶层与社会知觉: 热情和能力哪个更重要? 心理学报, 50(2), 243-252.[CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
杨亚平, 徐强, 朱婷婷, 郑旭涛, 董晓晔, 陈庆伟(2019). 不同热情-能力社会群体刻板印象激活效应的行为模式: 基于刻板印象内容模型. 心理学报, 51(10), 1143-1156.[CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
叶浩生(1992). 论班图拉观察学习理论的历史意义. 心理科学, 4(10), 43-45.[CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤(2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理学报, 38(4), 1019-1023.[CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
佐斌, 戴月娥, 温芳芳, 高佳, 谢志杰, 何赛飞(2021). 人如其食: 食物性别刻板印象及对人物评价的影响. 心理学报, 53(2), 1-14.[CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
佐斌, 刘晅(2006). 基于IAT和SEB的内隐性别刻板印象研究. 心理发展与教育, 22(4), 57-63.[CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
佐斌, 温芳芳, 吴漾, 代涛涛(2018). 群际评价中热情与能力关系的情境演变: 评价意图与结果的作用. 心理学报, 50(10), 1180-1196.[CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
佐斌, 张阳阳, 赵菊, 王娟(2006). 刻板印象内容模型: 理论假设及研究. 心理科学进展, 14(1), 138-145.[CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and Com-munion from the Perspective of Self versus Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[16]
|
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and Agentic Con-tent in Social Cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255.[CrossRef]
|
|
[17]
|
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming Impression of Personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[18]
|
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender Stereotypes about Intel-lectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests. Science, 355, 389-391.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[19]
|
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018a). Evidence of Bias against Girls and women in Contexts That Emphasize Intellectual Ability. American Psychologist, 73, 1139-1153.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[20]
|
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018b). Messages about Brilliance Undermine Women’s Interest in Educational and Professional Opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 404-420.[CrossRef]
|
|
[21]
|
Cambon, L., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2018). Two Routes toward Compensa-tion: An Investigation into the Mechanisms of Compensation for High- and Low-Status Groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 24-35.[CrossRef]
|
|
[22]
|
Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Baier Manwell, L., Byars-Winston, A., Fi-ne, E., Ford, C. E. et al. (2015). The Effect of An Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution: A Cluster Randomized, Controlled Trial. Academic Medicine, 90, 221-230.[CrossRef]
|
|
[23]
|
Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2015). Response to Comment on “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines”. Science, 349, 391.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[24]
|
Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2017). The Brilliance Trap: How A Mis-placed Emphasis on Genius Subtly Discourages Women and African-Americans from Certain Academic Fields. Scientific American, 317, 60-65.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[25]
|
Colom, R., & Garcia-Lopez, O. (2002). Sex Differences in Fluid Intelligence among High School Graduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 445-451.[CrossRef]
|
|
[26]
|
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P. et al. (2009). Stereotype Content Model across Cultures: Towards Universal Similarities and Some Differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.[CrossRef]
|
|
[27]
|
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Cox, W., Kaatz, A., Sheridan, J., & Carnes, M. (2017). A Gender Bias Habit-Breaking Intervention Led to Increased Hiring of Female Faculty in STEMM De-partments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 211-215.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[28]
|
Drake, C. E., Primeaux, S., & Thomas, J. (2018). Comparing Implicit Gender Stereotypes between Women and Men with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Gender Issues, 35, 3-20.[CrossRef]
|
|
[29]
|
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2019). Gender Stereotypes Have Changed: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of U. S. Public Opinion Polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75, 301-315.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[30]
|
Elena, C. A., Rosa, R. B., Bruce, M., & Juan, L. E. (2012). Social Categorie as a Context for the Allocation of Attentional Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 934-943.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[31]
|
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Meth-ods, 39, 175-191.[CrossRef]
|
|
[32]
|
Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 67-73.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[33]
|
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cogni-tive Sciences, 11, 77-83.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[34]
|
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[35]
|
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)Respecting versus (Dis)Liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.[CrossRef]
|
|
[36]
|
Flore, P. C., Mulder, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018). The Influence of Gende Stereotype Threat on Mathematics Test Scores of Dutch High School Students: A Registered Report. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3, 140-174.[CrossRef]
|
|
[37]
|
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). Mouse Tracker: Soft-ware for Studying Real-Time Mental Processing Using a Computer Mouse-Tracking Method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226-241.[CrossRef]
|
|
[38]
|
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.[CrossRef]
|
|
[39]
|
Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K. (1986). Stereotypes and Stereotyp-ing: An Overview of the Cognitive Approach. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, 15, 127-163.
|
|
[40]
|
Hewstone, M., & Hamberger, J. (2000). Perceived Variability and Stereotype Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 103-124.[CrossRef]
|
|
[41]
|
Jaxon, J., Lei, R. F., Shachnai, R., Chestnut, E. K., & Cimpian, A. (2019). The Acquisition of Gender Stereotypes about Intellectual Ability: Intersections with Race. Journal of Social Is-sues, 75, 1192-2015.[CrossRef]
|
|
[42]
|
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the Social Role Theory of Stereotype Content: Observations of Groups’ Roles Shape Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 371-392.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[43]
|
Lauer, J. E., Yhang, E., & Lourenco, S. F. (2019). The Development of Gender Differences in Spatial Reasoning: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 537-565.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[44]
|
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Ex-pectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines. Science, 347, 262-265.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[45]
|
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. MacMillan Co.
|
|
[46]
|
Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Social Cognition: Categorical Person Perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239-255.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[47]
|
Meyer, M., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2015). Women Are Underrepresented in Fields Where Success Is Believed to Require Brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 235.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[48]
|
Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s Represen-tation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence from 66 Nations. Journal of Educational Psychol-ogy, 107, 631-644.[CrossRef]
|
|
[49]
|
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 16474-16479.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[50]
|
Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-Go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.[CrossRef]
|
|
[51]
|
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ≠ Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[52]
|
Okahana, H., & Zhou, E. (2018). Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2007 to 2017. Council of Graduate Schools.
|
|
[53]
|
Rivera, L. A., & Tilcsik, A. (2019). Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation. American Sociological Review, 84, 248-274.[CrossRef]
|
|
[54]
|
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A Multi-dimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[55]
|
Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and Explicit Atti-tudes toward Female Authority. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.[CrossRef]
|
|
[56]
|
Storage, D., Charlesworth, T. E. S., Banaji, M. R., & Cimpian, A. (2020). Adults and Children Implicitly Associate Brilliance with Men More than Women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, Article 104020.[CrossRef]
|
|
[57]
|
Wu, S. J., Bai, X., & Fiske, S. T. (2018). Admired Rich Or Resented Rich? How Two Cultures Vary in Envy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 1114-1143.[CrossRef]
|