3D打印辅助下跗骨窦切口治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折
Treatment of Sanders II and III Calcaneal Fractures with 3D Printing Assisted Incision of Tarsal Sinus
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.143659, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李 飞*#, 李 超:新疆医科大学第六附属医院骨病矫形(足踝)外科,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 跟骨骨折微创3D打印跗骨窦Calcaneal Fracture Minimally Invasive 3D Printing Tarsal Sinus
摘要: 目的:观察3D打印辅助下采用跗骨窦切口微创治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的临床疗效;方法:前瞻性选取2017年1月至2022年12月在新疆医科大学第六附属医院就诊的Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折30例,所有患者均为闭合性骨折,术前采用薄层CT扫描,采用数字化软件Mimics 21.0进行三维重建骨折模型,3D打印机打印出骨折模型,根据骨折形态及类型选用和预制个体化锁定钢板进行虚拟固定。所有患者采用跗骨窦切口行手术治疗,术后定期随访跟骨宽度、跟骨高度、跟骨Böhler角、跟骨Gissane角及足踝协会踝–后足评分(AOFAS)。结果:30例均获得随访,随访时间平均15.2 (1224)个月。随访期间所有患者未出现骨折不愈合,内固定松动、骨折畸形愈合等并发症,1例患者切口愈合不良,换药后愈合良好。1例患者出现腓肠神经症状,术后1年取出内固定后恢复正常。末次随访时踝与后足功能AOFAS评分:优25例,良3例,可2例,优良率93.3%。结论:通过3D打印技术辅助下经跗骨窦微创切口手术入路治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折具有切口小,手术时间短,临床疗效满意。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical effect of minimally invasive treatment of Sanders II and III calca-neal fractures with the assistance of 3D printing and tarsal sinus incision. Method: Thirty cases of Sanders II and III calcaneal fractures admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022 were prospectively selected. All patients had closed fractures. Thin-slice CT scan was performed before surgery, 3D fracture model was recon-structed by digital software Mimics21.0, and fracture model was printed by 3D printer. According to the shape and type of fracture, prefabricated and personalized locking plates were selected for vir-tual fixation. All patients were treated with tarsal sinus incision. Calcaneal width, calcaneal height, calcaneal Bohler Angle, calcaneal Gissane Angle, and foot ankle-posterior foot score (AOFAS) were followed up regularly after surgery. Results: All 30 cases were followed up for an average of 15.2 (12~24) months. During the follow-up period, there were no complications such as fracture nonun-ion, loose internal fixation, and malunion of fractures, etc. 1 patient had poor incision healing, and the healing was good after dressing change. One patient developed sural nerve symptoms, which returned to normal 1 year after removal of internal fixation. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS scores of ankle and hind foot function were excellent in 25 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 93.3%. Conclusion: With the assistance of 3D printing technology, the minimally invasive surgical approach through tarsal sinus for the treatment of Sanders II and III calcaneal fractures has small incision, short operation time and satisfactory clinical efficacy.
文章引用:李飞, 李超. 3D打印辅助下跗骨窦切口治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 15-19. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.143659

参考文献

[1] Cotton, F.J. and Henderson, F.F. (1916) Results of Fracture of the Oscalcis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2, 290-298.
[2] Palmer, I. (1948) The Mechanism and Treatment of Fractures of the Calcaneus. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 30, 2-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Meng, Q., Wang, Q., Wu, X., Peng, A. and Yan, J.J.M. (2018) Clinical Application of the Sinus Tarsi Approach in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture. Medicine, 97, e0175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Essex-Lopresti, P. (1952) The Mechanism, Reduction Technique, and Results in Fractures of the OS Calcis. British Journal of Surgery, 39, 395-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 于健, 施玲玲, 申屠刚, 等. 跗骨窦切口海马钢板微创内固定治疗后关节面塌陷跟骨骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2022, 37(2): 213-215.
[6] 段晓东, 王保云, 蔡长马. 跗骨窦切口空心钉与外侧L形切口钢板内固定治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2021, 36(6): 639-641.
[7] 范鑫斌, 张波, 吴亮, 等. 微创跗骨窦切口联合经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗Sanders II和III型跟骨骨折的临床疗效[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2021, 42(4): 252-257.
[8] 赵永杰, 关国锋, 尹刚, 等. 跗骨窦切口微创锁定接骨板治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2023, 25(7): 635-639.
[9] Day, M.A., Ho, M., Dibbern, K., et al. (2020) Correlation of 3D Joint Space Width from Weightbearing CT with Outcomes after Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture. Foot & Ankle International, 41, 1106-1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] N. A. Giovinco, S. P. Dunn, L. Dowling et al. (2012) A Novel Combination of Printed 3-Dimensional Anatomic Templates and Computer-Assisted Surgical Simulation for Virtual Preoperative Planning in Charcot Foot Reconstruction. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 51, 387-393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wang, Z., Wang, X.H., Li, S.L., et al. (2016) Navigated 2-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A 5-cm-Incision Procedure. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11, Article No. 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Illert, T., Rammelt, S., Drewes, T., Grass, R. and Zwipp, H. (2011) Stability of Locking and Non-Locking Plates in an Osteoporotic Calcaneal Fracture Model. Foot & Ankle International, 32, 307-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Du, H., Li, S., Tu, S., Wang, K. and Fang, Z. (2022) The Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Tarsal Sinus Approach and L-Type Incision Approach Combined with 3D Printing Technology in Calcaneal Fracture. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, Article ID: 5706341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] El-Desouky, I.I. and Senna, W.A.J.I. (2017) The Outcome of Supercu-taneous Locked Plate Fixation with Percutaneous Reduction of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures. Injury, 48, 525-530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Kostretzis, L., Zigras, F., Bampis, I., et al., (2022) Radial Neck Fracture Nonunion: A Case Report and Novel Fixation Technique. Orthopedic Reviews, 14, 32375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 林永培, 廖乐明, 刘群铧, 等. 3D打印辅助下跗骨窦微创切口治疗跟骨骨折疗效[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2021, 26(1): 106-107.