低分子肝素预防后路单节段腰椎固定融合术术后下肢血栓形成的回顾性研究
A Retrospective Study of Low Molecular Heparin for the Prevention of Postoperative Lower Extremity Thrombosis after Posterior Single-Segment Lumbar Fixation and Fusion Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.143695, PDF,   
作者: 赵永华, 罗 昊:青岛大学第一临床医学院,山东 青岛;西永明*:青岛大学附属医院脊柱外科,山东 青岛
关键词: 腰椎融合术深静脉血栓低分子肝素术中出血量术后引流量Lumbar Fusion Deep Vein Thrombosis Low Molecular Heparin Intraoperative Bleeding Postoperative Drainage
摘要: 目的:探讨在后路单节段腰椎固定融合术术后预防性应用低分子肝素疗效分析。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月~2022年11月于青岛大学脊柱外科收治并实施后路单节段腰椎椎间融合术(Posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF)手术的腰椎退变性疾病病人171例,根据手术24小时后是否开始应用低分子肝素皮下注射分为实验组90例和对照组81例,术前经双下肢血管彩色多普勒超声检查确认均无血栓形成;实验组均自手术24小时后开始应用低分子肝素5000 IU皮下注射,1次/日,进行抗凝治疗,至下地活动后停用。所有病人均于术后下地活动时复查血凝及部分进行双下肢血管超声评估有无DVT形成。观察两组病人术后DVT的发生率、术后切口引流量、伤口血肿情况及D-二聚体等情况。结果:对照组病人中术后未发生DVT,2例出现下肢肌间静脉血栓,发生率约为2.5% (2/81);实验组病人术后未发生DVT。实验组和对照组病人术后切口引流量分别为358.56 mL和354.32 mL,实验组的术后引流略多于对照组,差异没有统计学意义,应用低分子肝素并不明显增加术后引流量,实验组的D-二聚体的增长幅度为224.44,对照组的D-二聚体的增长幅度为380.99,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),实验组的D-二聚体增长幅度明显小于对照组,均未见椎管内及切口血肿及无术后神经损伤症状。结论:腰椎退变性疾病病人往往手术后存在下肢静脉血栓形成风险,可常规预防性应用低分子肝素,术后未出现切口引流量增多及血肿形成等明显并发症。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the efficacy of postoperative prophylactic application of low molecular heparin in posterior single-segment lumbar interbody fusion. Methods: 171 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who were admitted to the Department of Spine Surgery of Qingdao University and underwent posterior single-segment lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) from January 2021 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 90 cases in the experimental group and 81 cases in the control group according to whether or not they started to apply low-molecular heparin subcutaneously 24 hours after surgery. The experimental group consisted of 90 patients and the control group consisted of 81 patients, all of whom were confirmed to be free of thrombosis by color Doppler ultrasound examination of the blood vessels of both lower limbs before the operation; the experimental group was treated with anticoagulation by subcutaneous injections of 5000 IU of low molecular heparin once a day starting 24 hours after the operation, and then discontinued after going down to the ground for activities. All patients were rechecked for blood coagulation and some of them underwent bilateral lower extremity vascular ultrasound to evaluate the presence of DVT formation at the time of postoperative activities. The incidence of postoperative DVT, postoperative incisional drainage, wound hematoma and D-dimer were observed in both groups. Results: In the control group, no DVT occurred after surgery, but 2 cases of intermuscular vein thrombosis in the lower limbs occurred, and the incidence rate was about 2.5% (2/81); in the experimental group, no DVT occurred after surgery; the postoperative incisional drainage flow of the experimental group and the control group was 358.56 mL and 354.32 mL, respectively, and the postoperative drainage flow of the experimental group was slight-ly more than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant, and the application of low molecular heparin did not significantly increase the postoperative drainage flow, and the application of low molecular heparin did not significantly increase the postoperative drainage flow. The application of low molecular heparin did not significantly increase the postoper-ative drainage flow. The increase of D-dimer in the experimental group was 224.44, and the in-crease of D-dimer in the control group was 380.99, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the increase of D-dimer in the experimental group was significantly smaller than that of the control group, and there were no intradural and incisional hematomas and no symptoms of postoperative neurological injury. Conclusion: Patients with lumbar degenerative diseases are often at risk of lower extremity venous thrombosis after surgery, and low molecular heparin can be ap-plied routinely and prophylactically, and no obvious complications such as increased incisional drainage and hematoma formation were seen after surgery.
文章引用:赵永华, 罗昊, 西永明. 低分子肝素预防后路单节段腰椎固定融合术术后下肢血栓形成的回顾性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 264-270. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.143695

参考文献

[1] Sakaura, H., Ikegami, D., Fujimori, T., Sugiura, T., Mukai, Y., Hosono, N. and Fuji, T. (2019) Early Cephalad Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study between Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Traditional Trajectory Screw Fixation. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 32, 155-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Lian, X.F., Hou, T.S., Xu, J.G., Zeng, B.F., Zhao, J., Liu, X.K., Yang, E.Z. and Zhao, C. (2014) Single Segment of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Isthmic Spondylolis-thesis: Reduction or Fusion in Situ. European Spine Journal, 23, 172-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Shillingford, J.N., Laratta, J.L., Lombardi, J.M., et al. (2018) Complications Following Single-Level Interbody Fusion Procedures: An ACS-NSQIP Study. Journal of Spine Surgery, 4, 17-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Bouyer, B., Rudnichi, A., Dray-Spira, R., Zureik, M. and Coste, J. (2018) Thromboembolic Risk after Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Cohort Study on 325 000 French Patients. Jour-nal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 16, 1537-1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zuckerman, S.L., Berven, S., Streiff, M.B., et al. (2023) Management of Anticoagulation/Antiplatelet Medication and Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elective Spine Surgery: Concise Clinical Recommendations Based on a Modified Delphi Process. Spine, 48, 301-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Streiff, M.B. and Haut, E.R. (2009) The CMS Ruling on Venous Thromboembolism after Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: Weighing Risks and Benefits. JAMA, 301, 1063-1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Zhou, L.B., Wang, C.C., Zhang, L.T., Wu, T. and Zhang, G.Q. (2023) Effectiveness of Different Antithrombotic Agents in Combination with Tranexamic Acid for Venous Thrombo-embolism Prophylaxis and Blood Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24, Article No. 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Shiqing, W., Shengzhong, M., Cheng, Z., Guangqing, C. and Chunzheng, G. (2019) Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Spinal Trauma Patients after Part Concentrated Screw Surgery and Its Influence on Blood Parameters and the Incidence of Deep Venous Thrombosis. Medical Hypoth-eses, 132, Article ID: 109330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Brambilla, S., Ruosi, C., La Maida, G.A. and Caserta, S. (2004) Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Spinal Surgery. European Spine Journal, 13, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Watson, N. (1968) Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Spinal Cord Injury. Paraplegia, 6, 113-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Jameson, S.S., James, P., Howcroft, D.W., Serrano-Pedraza, I., Rangan, A., Reed, M.R. and Candal-Couto, J. (2011) Venous Thromboembolic Events Are Rare after Shoulder Surgery: Analysis of A National Database. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 20, 764-770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Bawa, H., Weick, J.W., Dirschl, D.R. and Luu, H.H. (2018) Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis and Deep Vein Thrombosis Rates after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 26, 698-705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Durand, W.M., Goodman, A.D., Johnson, J.P. and Daniels, A.H. (2018) Assessment of 30-Day Mortality and Complication Rates Associated with Extended Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis Following Hip Fracture Surgery. Injury, 49, 1141-1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Unay, K., Akan, K., Sener, N., Cakir, M. and Poyanli, O. (2009) Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Deep-Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis Protocol in Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15, 668-674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Olinger, C.R. and Gardocki, R.J. (2020) Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of 2 Cases in 315 Procedures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 51, 423-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kim, Y.H., Ha, K.Y. and Kim, S.I. (2017) Spinal Cord Injury and Related Clinical Trials. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 9, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zlatev, D.V., Shem, K. and Elliott, C.S. (2016) How Many Spinal Cord Injury Patients Can Catheterize Their Own Bladder? The Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Function as It Affects Bladder Management. Spinal Cord, 54, 287-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Sansone, J.M., Del Rio, A.M. and Anderson, P.A. (2010) The Prevalence of and Specific Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolic Disease Following Elective Spine Surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 92, 304-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Leon, L., Rodriguez, H., Tawk, R.G., Ondra, S.L., Labropoulos, N. and Morasch, M.D. (2005) The Prophylactic Use of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Spinal Surgery. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 19, 442-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Strom, R.G. and Frempong-Boadu, A.K. (2013) Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis 24 to 36 Hours after Degenerative Spine Surgery: Risk of Hemorrhage and Venous Thromboembolism. Spine, 38, E1498-E1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Gerlach, R., Raabe, A., Beck, J., Woszczyk, A. and Seifert, V. (2004) Postoperative Nadroparin Administration for Prophylaxis of Thromboembolic Events Is Not Associated with an Increased Risk of Hemorrhage after Spinal Surgery. European Spine Journal, 13, 9-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]