应试教育背景下“双减”政策的家校社应对路径
Response Path of the Family, School and Society to the “Double Reduction” Policy in the Context of Test-Oriented Education
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2024.143338, PDF,   
作者: 周润聪:河南理工大学外国语学院,河南 焦作
关键词: 应试教育“双减”政策家校社Test-Oriented Education “Double Reduction” Policy Families Schools and Society
摘要: 本文基于应试教育的基本内涵和主要特征,分析了应试教育存在的弊端,基于此背景,探究家校社对“双减”政策的应对路径。本文指出了应试教育的社会根源和现实因素,即分数至上的评价标准、以考定教的教学活动、家庭教育的内卷意识和未能真正理解素质教育的内涵。“双减”政策大背景下,需要统筹家庭、学校、社会三方面的力量,从而为青少年的健康发展提供方向。
Abstract: Based on the basic connotation and main characteristics of test-oriented education, this paper analyzes its shortcomings. And based on this background, it explores the response path of the families, schools and society to the “double reduction” policy. This paper points out the social roots and practical factors of test-oriented education; these are: the evaluation standard that puts scores above everything else, the teaching activities that are based on examinations, the sense of inward scrolling in family education and the failure to truly understand the connotation of quality education. In the context of the “double reduction” policy, it is necessary to integrate the strengths of families, schools and society, so as to provide a direction for the healthy development of young people.
文章引用:周润聪. 应试教育背景下“双减”政策的家校社应对路径[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(3): 113-117. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2024.143338

参考文献

[1] 中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2021(10): 6.
[2] 毛亚庆. 愉快教育理论与实践的误区[J]. 教育科学研究, 1995(1): 1-3+16.
[3] 国家教委《中国新一代》杂志社. 素质教育理论丛书之应试教育与素质教育[M]. 北京: 时事出版社, 1996: 1.
[4] 王道俊, 郭文安. 教育学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2009: 105.
[5] 边玉芳, 张馨宇. “双减”背景下如何做好家庭教育指导[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(5): 10-11.
[6] 鞠佳雯, 李妍. 促进家长参与家校合作的国际经验及启示[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(5): 33-38, 62.