国际商事仲裁内部选择性上诉制度探析
An Analysis of the Internal Selective Appeal System in International Commercial Arbitration
摘要: 仲裁的优势之一是它的一裁终局性,但随着国际交易规模和金额的日益扩大,许多境外仲裁机构由此衍生出内部选择性上诉制度,深圳国际仲裁院借鉴知名境外仲裁机构引进此制度。但其中的许多规定与我国仲裁法以及民事诉讼法的规定存在冲突,并且可能导致当事人滥诉以及裁决在我国的承认与执行还存在问题。上述限制了复裁在我国的适用范围,在现行制度下,只能采取措施避免复裁制度与《仲裁法》的诸多规定相冲突。但随着国际贸易的发展,我国的《仲裁法》有必要作出调整,采取在部分地区尤其是高新技术产区进行试点以及制定符合仲裁制度特点的监督机制的方式来完善仲裁制度的发展。
Abstract:
One of the advantages of arbitration is its finality, but with the increasing scale and amount of international transactions, many overseas arbitration institutions have derived an internal optional appellate system, and the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration has introduced this system by drawing on well-known overseas arbitration institutions. However, many of these provisions conflict with the provisions of China’s Arbitration Law and Civil Procedure Law, and may lead to abusive litigation by the parties and problems in the recognition and enforcement of awards in China. The above limits the scope of application of the review in China, and under the current system, measures can only be taken to avoid conflicts between the review system and many provisions of the Arbitration Law. However, with the development of international trade, it is necessary to adjust China’s Arbitration Law, and improve the development of the arbitration system by carrying out pilot projects in some areas, especially in high-tech production areas, and formulating supervision mechanisms that are in line with the characteristics of the arbitration system.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
石现明. 国际商事仲裁当事人权利救济制度研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2011: 53.
|
|
[2]
|
刘晓红.仲裁“一裁终局”制度之困境及本位回归[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 39.
|
|
[3]
|
宋肇屹. 告别“一裁终局”?——中国大陆商事仲裁实体上诉机制研究[J]. 北京仲裁, 2017(4): 105-131.
|
|
[4]
|
陈安. 英、美、德、法等国涉外仲裁监督机制辨析——与肖永平先生商榷[J]. 法学评论, 1998(5): 25-39.
|
|
[5]
|
肖永平. 也谈我国法院对仲裁的监督范围——与陈安先生商榷[J]. 法学评论, 1998(1): 42-49.
|
|
[6]
|
邹东俊. 我国涉外仲裁司法监督制度的反思与完善[J]. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2007(4): 123-126+131.
|
|
[7]
|
石现明. 国际商事仲裁价值取向之检讨——以当事人的价值追求为视角[J]. 学术论坛, 2007(9): 133-139.
|
|
[8]
|
GAFTA (2024). http://www.gafta.com.cn/
|
|
[9]
|
罗楚湘. 英国仲裁法研究[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012: 52.
|
|
[10]
|
美国仲裁协会(AAA) [Z]. https://www.adr.org/, 2024-01-25.
|
|
[11]
|
伦敦国际仲裁院(LCIA) [Z]. https://www.lcia.org/, 2024-01-25.
|
|
[12]
|
汪祖兴, 郑夏. 自治与干预——国际商事仲裁当事人合意问题研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 65.
|