混合学习环境中学习者的动机调节：研究与展望
Learners’ Motivational Regulation in Blended Learning Environments: Research and Prospect
摘要: 动机调节是指学习者有目的地激发、维持、增强他们开始或完成某项学习任务的意愿的过程，是自我调节学习的重要组成部分。研究使用文献综述的方法，分析了混合学习环境中学习者的动机调节与认知、元认知调节，以及学业成绩的关系，并对其影响因素进行了总结。结果发现：1) 在混合学习环境中，动机调节能够预测学习者认知和元认知调节策略的使用，且内部动机调节策略的预测作用更强；2) 动机调节对混合学习效果的影响存在两种不同的观点：一方面动机调节能够提高学业成绩，另一方面动机调节可能会干扰学习过程，不利于提高学业成绩；3) 动机调节的作用会受到年级、尽责性、动机信念等个体因素及学科类型、任务难度、教师特质等环境因素的影响。本研究支持动机调节在混合学习环境中的重要作用，对指导教学实践、培养学习者的自我调节学习能力具有重要意义。
Abstract: Motivational regulation refers to the process that learners purposefully stimulate, maintain and enhance their willingness to start or complete a learning task, and is an important part of self- reg-ulated learning. Using the method of literature review, this paper analyzes the relationship be-tween learners’ motivational regulation, cognition, metacognitive regulation, and academic achievement in blended learning environment, and summarizes the influencing factors. The results show that: 1) In blended learning environment, motivational regulation can predict the use of cog-nitive and meta-cognitive regulation strategies, and the predictive effect of internal motivational regulation strategies is stronger; 2) There are two different views on the effect of motivational reg-ulation on blended learning: on the one hand, motivational regulation can improve academic per-formance; on the other hand, motivational regulation may interfere with the learning process and further hinder academic performance; 3) The role of motivational regulation is affected by individ-ual factors such as grade, conscientiousness, and motivational beliefs, as well as environmental fac-tors such as subject type, task difficulty and teacher characteristics. This study supports the im-portant role of motivational regulation in blended learning environment, which is of great signifi-cance for guiding educational practice and cultivating learners’ self-regulated learning ability.
文章引用：王祯, 马春霞, 王恩国 (2024). 混合学习环境中学习者的动机调节：研究与展望. 心理学进展, 14(3), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.143137

参考文献

[1] 范春霞(2014). 高中生动机调节策略与英语成绩的相关性研究. 硕士学位论文, 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学.
[2] 龚少英, 王祯, 袁新, 范宜平(2017). 混合学习环境中动机信念和动机调节与学习投入关系研究. 开放教育研究, 23(1), 84-92.
[3] 李昆(2011). 动机调控策略对学习策略和英语成绩的影响研究. 外语与外语教学, (2), 28-32.
[4] 李昆(2013). 中学生英语学习动机调控策略研究. 外语教学理论与实践, (1), 86-90.
[5] 刘燕(2014). 大学生英语学习动机调节策略个案调查. 语文学刊(外语教育教学), (7), 123-124.
[6] 沙乐, 刘玉亭(2011). 教师特质在增强学生情境型兴趣中的作用. 新课程研究: 高等教育, (1), 169-169.
[7] 王婷婷, 吴庆麟(2010). 中学生动机信念与动机策略之间关系的研究. 心理科学, 33(2), 467-470.
[8] 王祯, 龚少英, 曹阳, 袁新(2019). 混合学习环境下自我调节学习的机制研究. 教育研究与实验, (6), 92-96.
[9] Akamatsu, D., Nakaya, M., & Koizumi, R. (2019). Effects of Metacognitive Strategies on the Self-Regulated Learning Process: The Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 9, 120-128.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing Online and Blended Learner’s Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32.[CrossRef] 
[11] Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient Sources of Early Ado-lescents’ Self-Efficacy in Two Domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49-61.[CrossRef] 
[12] Chamot, A. U. (1990). Cognitive Instruction in the Second Lan-guage Classroom: The Role of Learning Strategies. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics (pp. 496-513).
[13] Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A School-Based Program to Enhance Self-Regulated and Self-Motivated Cycles of Student Learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537-550.[CrossRef] 
[14] Cooper, C. A., & Corpus, J. H. (2009). Learners’ Developing Knowledge of Strategies for Regulating Motivation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 525-536.[CrossRef] 
[15] Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2012). Major Contributions to the Psychology of Personality. In Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy (pp. 65-74). Routledge.
[16] Efklides, A. (2019). Gifted Students and Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model and Its Implications for SRL. High Ability Studies, 30, 79-102.[CrossRef] 
[17] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.[CrossRef] 
[18] Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016). Effects of Using Motivational Regulation Strategies on Students’ Academic Procrastination, Academic Performance, and Well-Being. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 162-170.[CrossRef] 
[19] Koskinen, A., McMullen, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Ninaus, M., & Kiili, K. (2023). The Strength and Direction of the Difficulty Adaptation Affect Situational Interest in Game-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 194, Article 104694.[CrossRef] 
[20] Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Grunschel, C., & Leutner, D. (2022). Self-Efficacy for Motivational Regulation and Satisfaction with Academic Studies in STEM Undergraduates: The Mediating Role of Study Motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, Article 102096.[CrossRef] 
[21] Kwok, M. L. J., Kwong, R., & Wong, M. (2022). How to Facilitate Motivational Regulation Strategies: Perspectives on Teacher Humility and Teacher-Student Relationship. Computers & Ed-ucation, 191, Article 104645.[CrossRef] 
[22] Ljubin-Golub, T., Petričević, E., & Rovan, D. (2019). The Role of Personality in Motivational Regulation and Academic Procrastination. Educational Psychology, 39, 550-568.[CrossRef] 
[23] Malmberg, L. E., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Processes of Students’ Effort Exertion, Competence Beliefs and Motivation: Cyclic and Dynamic Effects of Learning Experiences within School Days and School Subjects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 299-309.[CrossRef] 
[24] Prabha, M., Punniyamoorthy, M., & Nivethitha, S. (2021). Ex-amining the Bi-Directional Relationship between Motivation and Satisfaction: Based on the Impact of Psychological Em-powerment. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11, 431-453.[CrossRef] 
[25] Sansone, C., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & MacNamara, A. (2012). Regulating Interest When Learning Online: Potential Motivation and Performance Trade-Offs. The Internet and Higher Ed-ucation, 15, 141-149.[CrossRef] 
[26] Schwinger, M., & Otterpohl, N. (2017). Which One Works Best? Considering the Relative Importance of Motivational Regulation Strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 122-132.[CrossRef] 
[27] Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not All Roads Lead to Rome—Comparing Different Types of Motivational Regulation Profiles. Learning and Individual Dif-ferences, 22, 269-279.[CrossRef] 
[28] Shunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). In-fluencing Children’s Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 7-25.[CrossRef] 
[29] Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A Ques-tionnaire-Based Validation of Multidimensional Models of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 674-701.[CrossRef] 
[30] Umemoto, T., Ito, T., & Tanaka, K. (2016). Relation-ships between Regulation Strategies, Emotional and Behavioral Engagement, and Academic Achievement. Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 87, 334-342.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.[CrossRef] 
[32] Winne, P. H. (1996). A Metacognitive View of Individual Differ-ences in Self-Regulated Learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327-353.[CrossRef] 
[33] Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-Regulated Learning and College Students’ Regulation of Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235.[CrossRef] 
[34] Wolters, C. A. (1999). The Relation between High School Students’ Motivational Regulation and Their Use of Learning Strategies, Effort, and Classroom Performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281-299.[CrossRef] 
[35] Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205.[CrossRef] 
[36] Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of Motivation: Contextual and Social Aspects. Teachers College Record, 113, 265-283.[CrossRef] 
[37] Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2005). Origin, Direction and Impact of Emotions in Social Online Learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 449-464.[CrossRef] 
[38] Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Liew, J., Zhou, X., & Kogut, A. (2023). Synthesizing Research Evidence on Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement in Online and Blended Learning Environments: A Scoping Review. Educational Research Review, 39, Article 100510.[CrossRef] 
[39] Yun, H., & Park, S. (2020). Building a Structural Model of Moti-vational Regulation and Learning Engagement for Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 271-285.[CrossRef] 
[40] Yun, H., Park, S., Kim, D., Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2020). The Influence of Academic Level and Course Delivery Mode on the Use of Motivational Regulation Strategies and Learning En-gagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 89-103.[CrossRef] 
[41] Zheng, W., Yu, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2022). Social Media on Blended Learning: The Effect of Rapport and Motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41, 1941-1951.[CrossRef]