认知语言学视角下的多义词教学研究
Research on Polysemy Teaching from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics
摘要: 语言中普遍存在着一词多义现象，从一词一义到一词多义经历了复杂的词义延伸和拓展历程。从认知语言学角度，认知语言学基于语义的中心地位，强调了语言的理据性，指明一词多义是人类思维方式和认知手段在语言层面上的具体体现。本文基于原型范畴化、概念隐喻和转喻理论，探讨了一词多义现象产生的认知理据。词义发展的认知理据性也进而为多义词教学提供了有益启示，指出多义词教学活动的开展要依据词义延伸的认知理据性，以期实现词汇教学的效率化。
Abstract: Polysemy is a commonplace phenomenon in language. The transition from monosemy to polysemy is inherently a complex process of semantic extension as well as expansion. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, semantics assumes a central position and semantic change in language is predicated on cognitive rationality, namely, the phenomenon of polysemy is in essence the concrete embodiment of human thinking mode and cognitive means at the linguistic level. On the basis of the theories of prototype categorization, conceptual metaphor and metonymy, this paper probes into the cognitive rationality of polysemy. The cognitive rationality of semantic change is expected to provide beneficial revelations for polysemy teaching. That is, polysemy teaching should touch upon cognitive rationality so as to enhance the efficiency of vocabulary teaching.
文章引用：李维勇. 认知语言学视角下的多义词教学研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2024, 12(3): 54-59. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2024.123171

参考文献

[1] Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H.J. (2013) An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Routledge, London. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] 刘正光. 认知语言学的语言观与外语教学的基本原则[J]. 外语研究, 2010(1): 8-14.
[3] Rosch, E. and Mervis, C.B. (1975) Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Lakoff, G. (2008) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[5] Langacker, R.W. (2017) Ten Lectures on the Basics of Cognitive Grammar. Brill, Leiden. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Taylor, J.R. (2003) Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[8] 刘志成. 英汉人体词一词多义认知对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2014.
[9] Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (2009) More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[10] Langacker, R.W. (2000) Grammar and Conceptualization. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 董成如. 转喻的认知解释[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2004(2): 6-9.
[12] Apresjan, J.D. (1974) Regular Polysemy. Linguistics, 12, 5-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Radden, G. and Kövecses, Z. (1999) Towards a Theory of Me-tonymy. Metonymy in Language and Thought, 4, 17-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 魏在江. 语法构式的转喻认知理据——以“动宾 + 宾语”构式为例[J]. 中国外语, 2021, 18(3): 24-30.
[15] 龚玉苗. 隐喻意识与外语词汇教学[J]. 外语界, 2006(1): 40-45.
[16] Sweetser, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Barcroft, J. (2002) Semantic and Struc-tural Elaboration in L2 Lexical Acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Boers, F. and Lindstromberg, S. (2006) Cognitive Linguistic Appli-cations in Second or Foreign Language Instruction: Rationale, Proposals, and Evaluation. In: Gitte, K., Michel, A., René, D. and Francisco, J., Eds., Cognitive Linguistics, Ruiz De Mendoza Ibáñez, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, 305-358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]